Speculation: 2013 Offseason Thread Part IV: SCF, end. Trades, begin.

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
And yet that "very overrated" PP player was tied for 4th in the NHL in PP goals last season, and tied for 8th the year before despite missing 22 games.
He was a good PP player on bad PP teams. I think Nash acquisition makes it somewhat redundant. Nash can't really work the half-wall well and is better suited in front of the net IMO. Callahan also occupies that role, so it's sort of a problem. Both Jagr and Iginla's bread and butter are working the half-wall on the right side.

Edit: I remember when Darcy Tucker and Glen Metropolit had an absurd amount of PP goals with tap-ins in front of the net.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
sign Lapierre Raymond
sign Fristic Lovejoy
trade one of Staal or Del Zotto for 1st round pick in the 5-12 range if possible




Rangers lines


Kreider Stepan Nash
Raymond Brassard Callahan
Hagelin Miller/Lindberg Zuccarello
Haley Lapierre Dorsett/Asham

McDonagh Girardi
Staal or Del Zotto Stralman
Moore Fristic
Lovejoy as 7th dman
 
Everyone talks about getting A RHD who is a trigger man. Iginla can shoot just as hard as any RHD could I bet and he could help in other facets as well. Would he sign here for a year or two (max) though
 
Everyone talks about getting A RHD who is a trigger man. Iginla can shoot just as hard as any RHD could I bet and he could help in other facets as well. Would he sign here for a year or two (max) though

Is he okay getting 3rd line minutes? Maybe 10-12 minutes a night? Nash and Callahan are going to be ahead of him.
 
Is he okay getting 3rd line minutes? Maybe 10-12 minutes a night? Nash and Callahan are going to be ahead of him.

I strongly doubt Iginla would be getting 10-12 minutes on the Rangers. Maybe the Penguins or Blackhawks, but certainly not the Rangers. He would easily be top 3 winger on this team.
 
I strongly doubt Iginla would be getting 10-12 minutes on the Rangers. Maybe the Penguins or Blackhawks, but certainly not the Rangers. He would easily be top 3 winger on this team.

Same position Gaborik was in. Except Gaborik is the better goal scorer. How did that work out?
 
Same position Gaborik was in. Except Gaborik is the better goal scorer. How did that work out?

Gaborik struggled because he was put on his off wing along with a low sh%. Even he didn't average 10-12 mins a night, those minutes are for 4th line players. Iginla will average more around 16-18 on any given night, as will Callahan's ice time will dip to those numbers.
 
Hossa is great, very smart player and one of the best two-way wingers in the league. I wanted the Rangers to sign him in 2008 to replace Jagr, and I would have liked him in 2009 if the Rangers hadn't signed Gaborik.

Doubt he'll get bought out this year as he can probably contribute to another cup run for Chicago but maybe next summer.
 
Is he okay getting 3rd line minutes? Maybe 10-12 minutes a night? Nash and Callahan are going to be ahead of him.

Cally on the shut down line with hags and the 3c. Iginla playing with 2 playmakers in Zucc and brass? Though that's kind of a soft line
 
Hossa is great, very smart player and one of the best two-way wingers in the league. I wanted the Rangers to sign him in 2008 to replace Jagr, and I would have liked him in 2009 if the Rangers hadn't signed Gaborik.

Doubt he'll get bought out this year as he can probably contribute to another cup run for Chicago but maybe next summer.

I'm glad we got Gaborik instead.
 
He was a good PP player on bad PP teams. I think Nash acquisition makes it somewhat redundant. Nash can't really work the half-wall well and is better suited in front of the net IMO. Callahan also occupies that role, so it's sort of a problem. Both Jagr and Iginla's bread and butter are working the half-wall on the right side.

Edit: I remember when Darcy Tucker and Glen Metropolit had an absurd amount of PP goals with tap-ins in front of the net.

It's only a problem because you're trying to create the problem. You're moving two guys out of their natural PP position just so you can try and justify adding Jagr or Iginla to reduce Callahan's PP and ES time. It makes no sense whatsoever.

Callahan is a very effective net-front presence. His production is evidence of that. The "good on a bad PP" excuse is just fluff that has no real meaning. He tied for 4th in the NHL in PP goals because our PP was bad? How do you even begin to conjure up such backwards logic?

I remember statistical anomalies too, but that doesn't mean they're remotely relevant to the point at hand.
 
Then where does MZA play?

LWer-Stepan-Nash
Kreider-Brassard-Iginla
Hagelin-Lindberg-Callahan
Pyatt-Boyle-Dorsett
MZA?

Honestly, who cares? I'd be thrilled is Sather could build a team that pushes MZA out of the lineup. Not because I dont like MZA, but because I know the Rangers would be a better team.
 
Logic dictates that with Nash's mammoth frame and silky hands he'd be a front of the net guy on the powerplay, but he's really never played there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad