effen
Registered User
- Jun 27, 2003
- 12,756
- 10,975
I think that because his metrics are so bad, there's a very vocal group which polarizes opinions a little more.
Personally, I think his upside is comparable to ADA's, and that he has a similar amount of development to go in order to reach it; but I find myself criticizing Pionk more often because of the opposing opinions that he is already this established top4 NHLer.
And I disagree with that assertion; he has just as far to go as ADA does, it's just that his weaknesses aren't as apparent.
Metrics are great, because people incessently bitch about Shattenkirk and how he looks terrible but he has our best Corsi and best corsirel
People bitch about Pionk because he has our worst corsi and corsirel BY A MILE but he looks really good