Shaman464
No u
A Kasper with hands you might say?He’s actually like Marco Kasper but with a better shot. Nice pick
A Kasper with hands you might say?He’s actually like Marco Kasper but with a better shot. Nice pick
So you don't care what scouts say in their draft year but you're willing to define this player by what "this player sounds like" ...Umm Larkin was out there as well and played more and was +5 vs -12. Why do I care what scouts from his draft year said? In the NHL he is definitely nothing special at all in his own end.
So you don't care what scouts say in their draft year but you're willing to define this player by what "this player sounds like" ...
From who?
If Raymond was called a 2 way player in his draft year and he's actually an extremely effective offensive player at the NHL level what's stopping MBN?
Seider must be worse defensively than Holl based on +/-
When Larkin was injured or entire team was shelled.
You missed the point entirely but whateverRaymond has been in the league for a bit now, his draft report means nothing at this point. MBN all we have is draft report at the moment and what others on here who know more about his game than I say about him. Does Zadina's draft report mean something still?
I guess ASP isn't any good and is boring because we won't see him in the pre-season either.Meh pick.
I wanted Hage. Would have been okay taking a flyer at Eiserman. Boring pick, and we won't see him pre-season.
You missed the point entirely but whatever
Nate will be much too busy contending for the Calder Trophy with all those cross-ice feeds to Stamkos.Not going to happen , but why not send Danielson to play together with MBN and ASP.
Its easy to paint that picture when you pick and choose the scouting reports that help make your point. Ferrari actually loves him so bad example but from the exact same page you pulled those from theres guys sayingSteven Ellis - Daily Faceoff - May 28th: "If you’re looking for a safe prospect who can play in the middle six and not get himself into trouble, MBN’s your guy. Brandsegg-Nygard looked great at the World Junior Championship for the lowly Norwegians and then finished the year off with a couple of great final games with the men’s national team."
Tony Ferrari - The Hockey News - Apr. 15th: "He is arguably the best forechecker in the draft, an excellent tactician along the boards, and doesn’t cheat for offense. He commits to playing a sound 200-foot game and does an excellent job in aiding and assisting defenders along the wall while making smart decisions in space with his positioning and stick play.
Corey Pronman - The Athletic - May 28th: "He thinks the game well and sees plays develop, but I don't think his playmaking is his main asset. Even if he's not very dynamic, Brandsegg-Nygard has a game that should lend itself to success versus men, eventually as a good NHL forward and potentially in a top six.
Not dynamic, middle six, "potentially in a top six".
Again, I hope he turns into something, but this isn't even like the dim praise for Danielson's offense. The guy flat out projects as a checking line winger. Not what this team needs.
He is the kind of guy you draft in the mid first when you are coming out of a tank and have already gotten your multiple top five picks. Not the kind of guy you draft when you are facing a dearth of offensively talented forwards.
MBN flosses his tooth gap with Zadina.
Great shot, straight line game to the net. Great neutral zone D. Really hard on the forecheck. Physical. I've compared him to a more skilled Lawson Crouse and Ivan Barbashev. Cory Pronman mentioned him as similar to Ryan Leonard as a prospect with a little less skill.
Its definitely a thing you just made upeh yes and no
is he a 2 way player? yes, but he's also a good example of the point they were making
guys like Raymond(or Benson as another recent example) that have high offensive potential and are also good defensively aren't described as two way players in their scouting reports, they'll instead get a bunch of praise for their offensive game and then their defensive game and side stuff like physicality or compete level will also get praised as applicable
as opposed to them being kinda lumped together and them getting literally called a 2 way guy, or it being reversed and the side stuff like physicality and compete level getting the primary mention alongside their defense and then the offensive skillset being mentioned as more of an afterthought
it's a subtle distinction but it's definitely a thing
I was also impressed with the technique of his one timers. It is silky smooth and comparable to e.g. Pastrnak or Hossa. Never seen prospects with such a ch kind of one timer recently.Going over some of the vids, I'm actually surprised by his shot. He can pick his corners and top shelf, looks like he has a heavy, hard release.
I am talking about next season , not 2 years from now.Nate will be much too busy contending for the Calder Trophy with all those cross-ice feeds to Stamkos.
I guess ASP isn't any good and is boring because we won't see him in the pre-season either.