Bleach Clean
Registered User
- Aug 9, 2006
- 27,476
- 7,180
HF Posters? Doubtful. Are VHL and MHL games even streamable?
They are searchable. Try Youtube first. Requires some digging and exact game references.
Here are three you can watch:
HF Posters? Doubtful. Are VHL and MHL games even streamable?
Conversely, I’m confused about reports his skating needs improvement. His skating pops carrying the puck through the neutral zone.
I feel like Cam Robinson is a pretty objective source when it comes to Canuck news. Was searching a bit on Podkolzin and found these that seem to apply here:
Again, I dont know why people are so fixated on comparing Podz to Jake. The two play nothing alike and if people actually watched clips of Podz, they’d see
He just scored 60 points playing with absolute garbage wingers for most of the year and you would be willing to bet good money that he won't break 70 in a career year? Quite the risk taker, I see.Tkachuk is essentially a ppg player at 21, and only getting better. Horvat is 24 and has only hit 60 points once. Tkachuk is clearly a better offensive player and game breaker imo.
As I said, I don't see Horvat ever reaching 70 points in his career. I would bet good money on that as well. I also wouldn't consider him a 1B. He's more a top end 2C. He won't be a 1B until his defensive game improves.
What he does next year in terms of production is going to vary his projection wildly:
- If he goes over a PPG in the VHL or is 0.5PPG in the KHL, then production concerns will be alleviated.
- If he's a sub-PPG player in the VHL and does not get a strong look in the KHL, then production concerns will dog him throughout the year.
- If he's a high end KHL producer, well, then he's done something Tarasenko didn't even do in his draft + 1 year.
Big year for him upcoming.
I'd settle for the winger version of Vladimir Tarasenko. Now that would be something!
Tarasenko slid to 16th overall in the 2010 draft because of the "Russian factor'. and after a couple of fairly pedestrian seasons in St. Louis (19 points in 38 games as a rookie) and a sophomore season of (43 points in 64 games); he exploded for 37 goals in his third season.So you would settle for Tarasenko? 5 straight 33+ goal seasons... I guess you dream pretty big VanJack.
There was about 2 players in the entire league that scored a PPG in the VHL. Both in their mid to late 20's. You might be setting expectations a bit high. Even .5 PPG in the KHL is going to be a tall order considering he will be on a top team that generally does not over utilize 18 year olds. If those are the requirements for people to feel good about him we should all prepare ourselves now for disappointment.
Tarasenko is a winger, with an elite wrist shot,Tarasenkos biggest weakness is that he can be uninterestd defensevly. They are not similar at all, just from the same countryI'd settle for the winger version of Vladimir Tarasenko. Now that would be something!
Tarasenko slid to 16th overall in the 2010 draft because of the "Russian factor'. and after a couple of fairly pedestrian seasons in St. Louis (19 points in 38 games as a rookie) and a sophomore season of (43 points in 64 games); he exploded for 37 goals in his third season.
Tarasenko listed at 6', 225, which is not far off Podkolzin (6', 190, who'll probably play at around 215). I get the fact it might be a 'stretch', but you can always dream. I mean, other than Pavel Bure, surely another Russian has to work for the Canucks eventually.
i watched a YT video of an "arm-chair analyst" who after watching 10 or so games of Podkolzin described him as a Lion.
On the defensive side of the game & forecheck, he's like a hunter out there. Stalking his prey, waiting for the right time to launch him self at an opponent with the puck, either hitting or stripping them.
I think he'll bring a different element to the Canucks. We dont need him to be a PPG player (although he might just as well develop into one!).
He doesnt need to be "the guy". I think that if he's becomes a two-way beast and someone who can drive a line through puck possession and puck retrieval while chipping in 30g, 30a, 60pts, he'll be considered a wicked pick at #10.