107th Obsequious Banter Thread: Ugly Sweaters Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.

Superman33

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
2,659
1,472
Bucks County.
I didn't even read options 2 and 3. I mean, is there any other choice?

thumbs-up-hulk.gif

As an educational consultant I don't really have a boss, so I pretend the guy who gives me the vast majority of work as my employer. We schedule events out a few months in advanced, so I had to tell him about the situation as I was only scheduling virtual sessions until I had a better handle on the options, their impacts, and the effected time frame. I ended up sending pretty much what I posted here to a few people who already knew so I could give them an update. This guys response was: Whenever someone asks me about you when you're going there for the first time I'm going to tell them, "He is the type of person who factors in whether he may or may not get super powers when making major medical decisions. You're gonna love him."
 

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
38,707
161,280
Huron of the Lakes
Finally had two appointments with different specialist this week to develop a game plan for dealing with my Acoustic Neuroma brain tumor. Good news is since the brain tumor was (accidentally) found early, it is still small enough that they won't have to do the full brain surgery as there are other options that can definitely be done before that is necessary. Bad news is that I essentially have three options and I have about 4 months to decide, which might drive me crazy... er... crazier.

I'm holding a public vote on which option to take, so any feedback is appreciated. I feel like I'm trying to solve some weird math word problem and the more perspectives the better.

1. Gammaknife radiation surgery: they attach a device directly to your head for a few hours while you have an MRI to get the tumors exact location and then they attach you to a fancy machine which shoots gamma radiation directly at the tumor. This option should essentially kill the tumor and it'll just stay where it is. Based on the size and positioning, I'll lose the hearing in my right ear over the course of about 10 years. This option shouldn't impact my facial nerve, but my balance could get a little bit messed up. Not too much info on long range success, so I'd need to get periodic MRIs to make sure it doesn't come back to life. If it does, then I'd be moving to option 2 at that time unless there is some unpredictable medical advancement that is a better option.

I'm really excited about this option because I'm fairly certain if there is an actual way to get super powers it is by having a large amount of gamma radiation shot directly into your brain.

2. Wait and get regular MRIs to keep track of it. If it starts to grow into other areas and causing more symptoms or my hearing gets to the point where it is no longer functional in my right ear, then take it out via "through the ear" surgery where they literally go through your ear to get it out. This type of surgery 100% ruins the hearing in that ear immediately, but it doesn't impact anything else. Balance and facial nerve would be fine. Very short surgery recovery. Odds that the tumor grows again is essentially none, so you just get MRIs periodically to make sure.

The downside is you never really know when you'd hit this option, the time table is unknowable, and in the mean time there is a chance other symptoms could occur other than my current slight hearing issue. So essentially until you'd do the "through the ear" surgery, my hearing will definitely progressively get worse in my right ear and if you wait too long you could end up having balance issues and/or facial paralysis. Also, definitely no super powers.

3. Have them to do the "through the ear" surgery in like April 2023. I have another MRI in mid-March to try to get a handle on the growth rate, which is why I've got four months to think this through. This option essentially sacrifices the rest of what time I have left with hearing in my right ear to get rid of the tumor before anything else could be impacted. No super powers, but also no trying to time the surgery right to ensure there are no other impacts via frequent MRIs. Only periodic MRIs to make sure it doesn't grow back.

There are a bunch of pros and cons for each of the three options, but it is pretty much set in stone that at some point I will I lose hearing in my right ear*, so given the situation, it could hardly go better.

Between the two different doctors and talking through the three options already with some people today, I think I'm looking at 3>2>1. I started looking at the three options with the mindset of "You have a brain tumor and there is a price to pay for having that brain tumor. Like a sacrifice must be made, so what is the least bad sacrifice?" and I ended up with:

1 = At most 10 more years of hearing + possible permanent balance issue + periodic MRIs to see if it is coming back to life + possible additional actions if it does come back + possible super powers

2 = Regular MRIs to determine growth + gradual loss of hearing and immediate loss of hearing in right ear at time of surgery + possible balance issues/facial paralysis + anxiety about the situation until it is done + periodic MRIs to make sure it stays gone - possible super powers

3 = Immediate loss of hearing in right ear + periodic MRIs to make sure it stays gone - possible super powers

Personally I think option 3 only exists because I definitely need to be in control of things way too much. There are a lot of "possible" impacts in 1 and 2. #3 gives me control over what happens and when, but seems like a rash decision to make when option 1 could be the tumor goes away and you have about 10 more years of functional hearing (which would put me into my mid-late 40s) and option 2 is you could get 2, 3, 4, 10, 15, etc... more years of functional hearing before losing it. Technically, none of the "bad" stuff has to happen in those scenarios, but I feel like it comes down to trading off the immediate loss of hearing in my right ear to ensure none of the "bad" stuff can happen.

*All types of hearing loss are like gone, gone. The cochlear nerve is basically going to be destroyed so a hearing aid or cochlear implant won't help as there isn't anything left to receive stimulation.

I don’t have the knowledge to give any sort of recommendation, but I can only imagine I’d want to keep my hearing for as long as possible. But is it better to accept the inevitability of it — and you have as good an attitude about it as possible — and try to achieve peace of mind? The possible permanent balance issues give me pause too with certain options, if that’s avoidable. That might be more disruptive than partial hearing.

But if your doctors didn’t explain that superpowers are a realistic possibility, I might consult a 3rd specialist. Just to be sure.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,562
171,401
Armored Train
Finally had two appointments with different specialist this week to develop a game plan for dealing with my Acoustic Neuroma brain tumor. Good news is since the brain tumor was (accidentally) found early, it is still small enough that they won't have to do the full brain surgery as there are other options that can definitely be done before that is necessary. Bad news is that I essentially have three options and I have about 4 months to decide, which might drive me crazy... er... crazier.

I'm holding a public vote on which option to take, so any feedback is appreciated. I feel like I'm trying to solve some weird math word problem and the more perspectives the better.

1. Gammaknife radiation surgery: they attach a device directly to your head for a few hours while you have an MRI to get the tumors exact location and then they attach you to a fancy machine which shoots gamma radiation directly at the tumor. This option should essentially kill the tumor and it'll just stay where it is. Based on the size and positioning, I'll lose the hearing in my right ear over the course of about 10 years. This option shouldn't impact my facial nerve, but my balance could get a little bit messed up. Not too much info on long range success, so I'd need to get periodic MRIs to make sure it doesn't come back to life. If it does, then I'd be moving to option 2 at that time unless there is some unpredictable medical advancement that is a better option.

I'm really excited about this option because I'm fairly certain if there is an actual way to get super powers it is by having a large amount of gamma radiation shot directly into your brain.

2. Wait and get regular MRIs to keep track of it. If it starts to grow into other areas and causing more symptoms or my hearing gets to the point where it is no longer functional in my right ear, then take it out via "through the ear" surgery where they literally go through your ear to get it out. This type of surgery 100% ruins the hearing in that ear immediately, but it doesn't impact anything else. Balance and facial nerve would be fine. Very short surgery recovery. Odds that the tumor grows again is essentially none, so you just get MRIs periodically to make sure.

The downside is you never really know when you'd hit this option, the time table is unknowable, and in the mean time there is a chance other symptoms could occur other than my current slight hearing issue. So essentially until you'd do the "through the ear" surgery, my hearing will definitely progressively get worse in my right ear and if you wait too long you could end up having balance issues and/or facial paralysis. Also, definitely no super powers.

3. Have them to do the "through the ear" surgery in like April 2023. I have another MRI in mid-March to try to get a handle on the growth rate, which is why I've got four months to think this through. This option essentially sacrifices the rest of what time I have left with hearing in my right ear to get rid of the tumor before anything else could be impacted. No super powers, but also no trying to time the surgery right to ensure there are no other impacts via frequent MRIs. Only periodic MRIs to make sure it doesn't grow back.

There are a bunch of pros and cons for each of the three options, but it is pretty much set in stone that at some point I will I lose hearing in my right ear*, so given the situation, it could hardly go better.

Between the two different doctors and talking through the three options already with some people today, I think I'm looking at 3>2>1. I started looking at the three options with the mindset of "You have a brain tumor and there is a price to pay for having that brain tumor. Like a sacrifice must be made, so what is the least bad sacrifice?" and I ended up with:

1 = At most 10 more years of hearing + possible permanent balance issue + periodic MRIs to see if it is coming back to life + possible additional actions if it does come back + possible super powers

2 = Regular MRIs to determine growth + gradual loss of hearing and immediate loss of hearing in right ear at time of surgery + possible balance issues/facial paralysis + anxiety about the situation until it is done + periodic MRIs to make sure it stays gone - possible super powers

3 = Immediate loss of hearing in right ear + periodic MRIs to make sure it stays gone - possible super powers

Personally I think option 3 only exists because I definitely need to be in control of things way too much. There are a lot of "possible" impacts in 1 and 2. #3 gives me control over what happens and when, but seems like a rash decision to make when option 1 could be the tumor goes away and you have about 10 more years of functional hearing (which would put me into my mid-late 40s) and option 2 is you could get 2, 3, 4, 10, 15, etc... more years of functional hearing before losing it. Technically, none of the "bad" stuff has to happen in those scenarios, but I feel like it comes down to trading off the immediate loss of hearing in my right ear to ensure none of the "bad" stuff can happen.

*All types of hearing loss are like gone, gone. The cochlear nerve is basically going to be destroyed so a hearing aid or cochlear implant won't help as there isn't anything left to receive stimulation.

Option 1 sounds best, based on keeping hearing for longer, and least invasive. But how severe are these balance issues?
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,562
171,401
Armored Train
Right. So the obvious preface is I have no idea what I'm talking about.

Per Doctor Google:

"A noncancerous tumor on the main nerve leading from the inner ear to the brain.
A vestibular schwannoma usually grows slowly or not at all. However, in a few cases, it may grow rapidly and become large enough to press against the brain and interfere with vital functions."

If this is true, and it is not growing fast, and there aren't awful side effects to it existing, my cancer-surviving wifeling says just leave it alone and do option 2. Get constant scans and get slicey/zappy only if it do a grow.
 

Superman33

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
2,659
1,472
Bucks County.
I don’t have the knowledge to give any sort of recommendation, but I can only imagine I’d want to keep my hearing for as long as possible. But is it better to accept the inevitability of it — and you have as good an attitude about it as possible — and try to achieve peace of mind? The possible permanent balance issues give me pause too with certain options, if that’s avoidable. That might be more disruptive than partial hearing.

But if your doctors didn’t explain that superpowers are a realistic possibility, I might consult a 3rd specialist. Just to be sure.

As my sister had mentioned, it isn't like the loss of hearing in one ear is really that life altering. I agree that the balance problem would be way worse, so I'm trying to stay away from that.

Option 1 sounds best, based on keeping hearing for longer, and least invasive. But how severe are these balance issues?

Due to the tumor (which I wasn't aware of at the time) I've had two "extreme" vertigo events that were horrible. Like could not move on all fours bad. For whatever reason it can touch the nerve in there in a way that makes everything spin. So between that being possible "at any time" and at minimum a general uneasiness on your feet, I'm not a fan. Had a friend mention that at 6'4 I have a longer way to fall than most people, so I should factor that in.

The real issue here though it is impossible to determine the answer to the question "how severe are these balance issues?". It is one of the "unknowables" that I don't like having control over.

4th option: I beat up your brain

Done. While you're going at it, you can also take some shots at the chemical receptors and memory areas. See if we can fix those while we're at it.
 

Lord Defect

Secretary of Blowtorching
Nov 13, 2013
18,931
35,021
“Sir, there’s a Twitter account that we belief is a clear and present danger to national security. They know too much. We feel that we need to terminate this account holder with extreme prejudice”.

“The account name?”

“@SeanBoswellDK.”
I can no longer select anything beyond like, this is horseshit!

“Sean Boswell, huh? Ok, tell me about him. What does ‘DK’ stand for? Donkey Kong?”

“No, sir. Drift King.”

“‘Drift’? What do you mean ‘drift’?”
Ok it’s back… I can laugh at things online again.
 

achdumeingute

Registered User
Jun 28, 2011
9,009
3,674
NorCal
As my sister had mentioned, it isn't like the loss of hearing in one ear is really that life altering. I agree that the balance problem would be way worse, so I'm trying to stay away from that.



Due to the tumor (which I wasn't aware of at the time) I've had two "extreme" vertigo events that were horrible. Like could not move on all fours bad. For whatever reason it can touch the nerve in there in a way that makes everything spin. So between that being possible "at any time" and at minimum a general uneasiness on your feet, I'm not a fan. Had a friend mention that at 6'4 I have a longer way to fall than most people, so I should factor that in.

The real issue here though it is impossible to determine the answer to the question "how severe are these balance issues?". It is one of the "unknowables" that I don't like having control over.



Done. While you're going at it, you can also take some shots at the chemical receptors and memory areas. See if we can fix those while we're at it.
I think the other advantage with the do nothing and wait NOW option is...it's possible that in the future new technology/treatment becomes available to be able to do something less severe than your current choices.
 

Lord Defect

Secretary of Blowtorching
Nov 13, 2013
18,931
35,021
Finally had two appointments with different specialist this week to develop a game plan for dealing with my Acoustic Neuroma brain tumor. Good news is since the brain tumor was (accidentally) found early, it is still small enough that they won't have to do the full brain surgery as there are other options that can definitely be done before that is necessary. Bad news is that I essentially have three options and I have about 4 months to decide, which might drive me crazy... er... crazier.

I'm holding a public vote on which option to take, so any feedback is appreciated. I feel like I'm trying to solve some weird math word problem and the more perspectives the better.

1. Gammaknife radiation surgery: they attach a device directly to your head for a few hours while you have an MRI to get the tumors exact location and then they attach you to a fancy machine which shoots gamma radiation directly at the tumor. This option should essentially kill the tumor and it'll just stay where it is. Based on the size and positioning, I'll lose the hearing in my right ear over the course of about 10 years. This option shouldn't impact my facial nerve, but my balance could get a little bit messed up. Not too much info on long range success, so I'd need to get periodic MRIs to make sure it doesn't come back to life. If it does, then I'd be moving to option 2 at that time unless there is some unpredictable medical advancement that is a better option.

I'm really excited about this option because I'm fairly certain if there is an actual way to get super powers it is by having a large amount of gamma radiation shot directly into your brain.

2. Wait and get regular MRIs to keep track of it. If it starts to grow into other areas and causing more symptoms or my hearing gets to the point where it is no longer functional in my right ear, then take it out via "through the ear" surgery where they literally go through your ear to get it out. This type of surgery 100% ruins the hearing in that ear immediately, but it doesn't impact anything else. Balance and facial nerve would be fine. Very short surgery recovery. Odds that the tumor grows again is essentially none, so you just get MRIs periodically to make sure.

The downside is you never really know when you'd hit this option, the time table is unknowable, and in the mean time there is a chance other symptoms could occur other than my current slight hearing issue. So essentially until you'd do the "through the ear" surgery, my hearing will definitely progressively get worse in my right ear and if you wait too long you could end up having balance issues and/or facial paralysis. Also, definitely no super powers.

3. Have them to do the "through the ear" surgery in like April 2023. I have another MRI in mid-March to try to get a handle on the growth rate, which is why I've got four months to think this through. This option essentially sacrifices the rest of what time I have left with hearing in my right ear to get rid of the tumor before anything else could be impacted. No super powers, but also no trying to time the surgery right to ensure there are no other impacts via frequent MRIs. Only periodic MRIs to make sure it doesn't grow back.

There are a bunch of pros and cons for each of the three options, but it is pretty much set in stone that at some point I will I lose hearing in my right ear*, so given the situation, it could hardly go better.

Between the two different doctors and talking through the three options already with some people today, I think I'm looking at 3>2>1. I started looking at the three options with the mindset of "You have a brain tumor and there is a price to pay for having that brain tumor. Like a sacrifice must be made, so what is the least bad sacrifice?" and I ended up with:

1 = At most 10 more years of hearing + possible permanent balance issue + periodic MRIs to see if it is coming back to life + possible additional actions if it does come back + possible super powers

2 = Regular MRIs to determine growth + gradual loss of hearing and immediate loss of hearing in right ear at time of surgery + possible balance issues/facial paralysis + anxiety about the situation until it is done + periodic MRIs to make sure it stays gone - possible super powers

3 = Immediate loss of hearing in right ear + periodic MRIs to make sure it stays gone - possible super powers

Personally I think option 3 only exists because I definitely need to be in control of things way too much. There are a lot of "possible" impacts in 1 and 2. #3 gives me control over what happens and when, but seems like a rash decision to make when option 1 could be the tumor goes away and you have about 10 more years of functional hearing (which would put me into my mid-late 40s) and option 2 is you could get 2, 3, 4, 10, 15, etc... more years of functional hearing before losing it. Technically, none of the "bad" stuff has to happen in those scenarios, but I feel like it comes down to trading off the immediate loss of hearing in my right ear to ensure none of the "bad" stuff can happen.

*All types of hearing loss are like gone, gone. The cochlear nerve is basically going to be destroyed so a hearing aid or cochlear implant won't help as there isn't anything left to receive stimulation.
That’s a tough call you should make between you and your doctor, with family input.
Jokingly and more in theme with the forum, go turn yourself into the Hulk.
 

Superman33

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
2,659
1,472
Bucks County.
I think the other advantage with the do nothing and wait NOW option is...it's possible that in the future new technology/treatment becomes available to be able to do something less severe than your current choices.

My best friend and I discussed this positive of option 1 and 2. A potential future medical advancement could come along that would make the "sacrifice" even easier. Personally, I think making decisions based on "potential future medical advancements" is a dangerous game to play. At 36 now and fairly healthy and in good shape, I should bounce back better from any intervention taken compared to if there is not a medical advancement and I end up having the "through the ear" surgery in my late 40s/50s. But in that instance, I'd still have functioning hearing up to that point.

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chicken N Raffls

GapToothedWonder

Registered User
Dec 20, 2013
5,358
9,206
Paris of the Praries
I’m about to toss this shit out the window.
Send it my way. Or print stuff for my model airplanes and send them my way.

Edit. After more back reading I'm not a crazy person with an entire airport built in my basement and 150 model airplanes. I just need something to do with my hands while listening to podcasts and my wife says power tools aren't allowed in the house in the evening. Clearly she lacks grit and character.
 
Last edited:

DancingPanther

Foundational Titan
Jun 19, 2018
34,006
72,254
Finally had two appointments with different specialist this week to develop a game plan for dealing with my Acoustic Neuroma brain tumor. Good news is since the brain tumor was (accidentally) found early, it is still small enough that they won't have to do the full brain surgery as there are other options that can definitely be done before that is necessary. Bad news is that I essentially have three options and I have about 4 months to decide, which might drive me crazy... er... crazier.

I'm holding a public vote on which option to take, so any feedback is appreciated. I feel like I'm trying to solve some weird math word problem and the more perspectives the better.

1. Gammaknife radiation surgery: they attach a device directly to your head for a few hours while you have an MRI to get the tumors exact location and then they attach you to a fancy machine which shoots gamma radiation directly at the tumor. This option should essentially kill the tumor and it'll just stay where it is. Based on the size and positioning, I'll lose the hearing in my right ear over the course of about 10 years. This option shouldn't impact my facial nerve, but my balance could get a little bit messed up. Not too much info on long range success, so I'd need to get periodic MRIs to make sure it doesn't come back to life. If it does, then I'd be moving to option 2 at that time unless there is some unpredictable medical advancement that is a better option.

I'm really excited about this option because I'm fairly certain if there is an actual way to get super powers it is by having a large amount of gamma radiation shot directly into your brain.

2. Wait and get regular MRIs to keep track of it. If it starts to grow into other areas and causing more symptoms or my hearing gets to the point where it is no longer functional in my right ear, then take it out via "through the ear" surgery where they literally go through your ear to get it out. This type of surgery 100% ruins the hearing in that ear immediately, but it doesn't impact anything else. Balance and facial nerve would be fine. Very short surgery recovery. Odds that the tumor grows again is essentially none, so you just get MRIs periodically to make sure.

The downside is you never really know when you'd hit this option, the time table is unknowable, and in the mean time there is a chance other symptoms could occur other than my current slight hearing issue. So essentially until you'd do the "through the ear" surgery, my hearing will definitely progressively get worse in my right ear and if you wait too long you could end up having balance issues and/or facial paralysis. Also, definitely no super powers.

3. Have them to do the "through the ear" surgery in like April 2023. I have another MRI in mid-March to try to get a handle on the growth rate, which is why I've got four months to think this through. This option essentially sacrifices the rest of what time I have left with hearing in my right ear to get rid of the tumor before anything else could be impacted. No super powers, but also no trying to time the surgery right to ensure there are no other impacts via frequent MRIs. Only periodic MRIs to make sure it doesn't grow back.

There are a bunch of pros and cons for each of the three options, but it is pretty much set in stone that at some point I will I lose hearing in my right ear*, so given the situation, it could hardly go better.

Between the two different doctors and talking through the three options already with some people today, I think I'm looking at 3>2>1. I started looking at the three options with the mindset of "You have a brain tumor and there is a price to pay for having that brain tumor. Like a sacrifice must be made, so what is the least bad sacrifice?" and I ended up with:

1 = At most 10 more years of hearing + possible permanent balance issue + periodic MRIs to see if it is coming back to life + possible additional actions if it does come back + possible super powers

2 = Regular MRIs to determine growth + gradual loss of hearing and immediate loss of hearing in right ear at time of surgery + possible balance issues/facial paralysis + anxiety about the situation until it is done + periodic MRIs to make sure it stays gone - possible super powers

3 = Immediate loss of hearing in right ear + periodic MRIs to make sure it stays gone - possible super powers

Personally I think option 3 only exists because I definitely need to be in control of things way too much. There are a lot of "possible" impacts in 1 and 2. #3 gives me control over what happens and when, but seems like a rash decision to make when option 1 could be the tumor goes away and you have about 10 more years of functional hearing (which would put me into my mid-late 40s) and option 2 is you could get 2, 3, 4, 10, 15, etc... more years of functional hearing before losing it. Technically, none of the "bad" stuff has to happen in those scenarios, but I feel like it comes down to trading off the immediate loss of hearing in my right ear to ensure none of the "bad" stuff can happen.

*All types of hearing loss are like gone, gone. The cochlear nerve is basically going to be destroyed so a hearing aid or cochlear implant won't help as there isn't anything left to receive stimulation.
Gamma knife is super common in the grand scheme of resection surgeries. All the best my man
 

achdumeingute

Registered User
Jun 28, 2011
9,009
3,674
NorCal
My best friend and I discussed this positive of option 1 and 2. A potential future medical advancement could come along that would make the "sacrifice" even easier. Personally, I think making decisions based on "potential future medical advancements" is a dangerous game to play. At 36 now and fairly healthy and in good shape, I should bounce back better from any intervention taken compared to if there is not a medical advancement and I end up having the "through the ear" surgery in my late 40s/50s. But in that instance, I'd still have functioning hearing up to that point.

giphy.gif
100% agree and it's probably an extremely remote chance. You have absolutely tough choices and I wish you the best with your decision.
 

Danko

The Bearer of Bad Knees
Jul 28, 2004
11,563
11,580
just watched squid game - i dont get it, why did this win awards?
 

GapToothedWonder

Registered User
Dec 20, 2013
5,358
9,206
Paris of the Praries
Bob Barker was The Price Is Right - unlike Jeopardy, I can't enjoy TPIR as much as I used to with the new host.
When the change first happened I would definitely agree with you. I think Drew has aged into the role pretty well though. It seems knowing in the back of your head that you are pretty much guaranteed the job for life is key.

It allows you to have that slight underlying contempt for the contestants when they are being stupid. Which I think is what really made Bob great.
 

Chicken N Raffls

Here for the chaos and lolz
Nov 7, 2022
3,823
7,984
Douglassville
My best friend and I discussed this positive of option 1 and 2. A potential future medical advancement could come along that would make the "sacrifice" even easier. Personally, I think making decisions based on "potential future medical advancements" is a dangerous game to play. At 36 now and fairly healthy and in good shape, I should bounce back better from any intervention taken compared to if there is not a medical advancement and I end up having the "through the ear" surgery in my late 40s/50s. But in that instance, I'd still have functioning hearing up to that point.

giphy.gif

Yea I can see some of the pros of option 2, but you also have to wait and hope, which would be stressful. I'd go with possible super powers all day. Best of luck to you!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Superman33

Lord Defect

Secretary of Blowtorching
Nov 13, 2013
18,931
35,021
Send it my way. Or print stuff for my model airplanes and send them my way.

Edit. After more back reading I'm not a crazy person with an entire airport built in my basement and 150 model airplanes. I just need something to do with my hands while listening to podcasts and my wife says power tools aren't allowed in the house in the evening. Clearly she lacks grit and character.
Use old fashioned hand tools. This guy works wonders with them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad