Lord Defect
Secretary of Blowtorching
- Nov 13, 2013
- 18,931
- 35,021
I don’t know, but if i had to guess, it’ll be about $50-175 for the tickets and another $100 or so for the Ticketmaster fees and charges.Anyone know what the prices for Stevie nicks and billy Joel tickets are?
So I see people on Twitter are freaking out about him “silencing critics” with these bans but then I look around for two whole minutes and it appears to only be a 7 day ban for posting his tracking information.
If the below is true, it seems fairly reasonable. If someone was tracking me or my family I’d want to try to prevent it too. Not sure why that kind of stuff would be allowed.
And this might have something to do with it. Kinda begged for it, didn’t he?
Regardless of whether you agree with the temporary bans or not, I don’t see how this contradicts the “restore the first amendment” talk. The first amendment doesn't say you can say or post literally anything with zero repercussions.
If they were banned for criticizing him then it would absolutely be hypocrisy, but if it’s true that it’s because they were sharing a way to see his or his families real time location then that seems pretty different.
The plane tracker thing is dumb, but it's also public info. People do it with athletes and coaches and it's frankly weird to me too.
IF this is real, does that change anything? If it is, it then seems more like "doxxing" than if it was public information (which I don't think it should be, but whatever). Gathering intentionally hidden information about someone and making it public would seem more bannable than just linking to a public resource.
Obviously those type of people are trash, but how does Twitter punish or even know about things that don't happen on Twitter?
Isn't verbal harassment in tweets or DMs the only type Twitter can punish because it's the only thing that involves Twitter?
Not cheap and a lot of the good seats are dynamic pricing.Anyone know what the prices for Stevie nicks and billy Joel tickets are?
Not cheap and a lot of the good seats are dynamic pricing.
My brother got a pair in the first few rows in the Club Level during the Eagles presale. I think that they were $500 or so for the pair. The last row in the club level was I think like $300 for a pair but they change all the time.
I get why tracking planes makes sense in certain situations/uses, but I just don’t see why it would be public for any random lunatic to use.To me, no. But again, I'm fine with getting rid of that stuff as long as it applies unilaterally.
There are benefits to having info like that public. There are also drawbacks. For an example of the former, outfits like Bellingcat have used these types of databases to track and expose Russian foreign assets. What you can do with OSINT these days is wild.
Ah ok, that makes sense then.There used to be an internal group that handled those issues because it's impossible to automate for this and a myriad other reasons. In the specific case I mean, it required a police report and an investigation. The threats specifically invoked Twitter.
In another case I don't believe was made public, one person had set up dozens of Twitter accounts specifically to harass an individual. It took months, but there was action eventually taken. That person's main account is also back now.
That department was all fired and not replaced.
I get why tracking planes makes sense in certain situations/uses, but I just don’t see why it would be public for any random lunatic to use.
Just like I wouldn’t trust the public to have access to a database that tracked cars or phones. You can obviously imagine how things like that could be used to do good, but still. Like I said, I just don’t trust people.
I think you're low on the ticketmaster chargesI don’t know, but if i had to guess, it’ll be about $50-175 for the tickets and another $100 or so for the Ticketmaster fees and charges.
Taylor Swift tickets were around that price before the Dynamic pricing got involved and then you got to the resale market which I haven't checked to see if it's cooled off on asking prices like I suspect it will.I mean compared to Taylor Swift tickets that seems cheap
I remember back when I was an actual child - not an HFLore child - and I thought that the people in charge knew what they were doing and could be relied upon.Brother, I don't trust the police to have access to them. We're not disagreeing on that one.
Done, I made a few so you could choose two!Just hurry up and print my sword
I think I can comfortably say that I am the only one on this board to serve in the military, hold an elected position in local government(accidentally), and have a lordship bestowed apon myself, the government is in fact in place to help you. If only the government could get out of its own way the majority of the time it might be helpful or at least competent.I remember back when I was an actual child - not an HFLore child - and I thought that the people in charge knew what they were doing and could be relied upon.
What a fool Young Striiker was.
"The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the Government, and I'm here to help."I think I can comfortably say that I am the only one on this board to serve in the military, hold an elected position in local government(accidentally), and have a lordship bestowed apon myself, the government is in fact in place to help you. If only the government could get out of its own way the majority of the time it might be helpful or at least competent.
That's not the Buster Sword.Done, I made a few so you could choose two!
View attachment 622411
Not with that attitude it isn’tThat's not the Buster Sword.
Fine, I just pulled this one hot off the presses for you.That's not the Buster Sword.
Pretty sure we did.Was trying to see if we had a specific thread for the WJC last time. Can't remember.
IF this is real, does that change anything? If it is, it then seems more like "doxxing" than if it was public information (which I don't think it should be, but whatever). Gathering intentionally hidden information about someone and making it public would seem more bannable than just linking to a public resource.
I wouldn't be at all surprised.
As I said, I don't trust Musk, I don't trust the people who love Musk, and I don't trust the people who hate Musk. In fact, I don't trust anyone on the entire planet to be completely reliable and honest.
I have no idea what actually happened and I can't imagine I ever will. Please note that's why even going back to my first post I went out of my way to specifically say "IF" those things were true.
Obviously those type of people are trash, but how does Twitter punish or even know about things that don't happen on Twitter?
Isn't verbal harassment in tweets or DMs the only type Twitter can punish because it's the only thing that involves Twitter?
I follow a twitter account that exclusively follows damn near any plane slightly close to being deemed important. Our military, everyone else’s military, a plane that was rented in 1992 by bull Clinton for a puddle jump. He takes his shit seriously.I mean, as I noted they aren't just his planes. A lot of people use them. Their reg numbers have been known for a long time, and regardless of privacy orders are still readily findable even without the Twitter account; there are a lot of people who track planes used by significant people, including CEOs and figures you'd never think to track, maybe for corporate intel purposes. My boss was bored and tracked one the other day. Hell, Of note, Musk wasn't traveling, even though the plane was. There's a whole internet niche for this and yacht tracking. Yesterday we watched military trainers farting around in formation with each other.
Musk is just making the loudest and most ridiculous tantrum over it. If he never freaks out to begin with, none of this ever even leaves its weird internet niche.