joshjull
Registered User
You protect the goalie. Intentional, unintentional, it makes no difference. Touching the tender is grounds for pummeling. Always.
Exactly. It's incredible to me anyone thinks that was the wrong move.
You protect the goalie. Intentional, unintentional, it makes no difference. Touching the tender is grounds for pummeling. Always.
because players don"t like to be beat up.
I can't comprehend why other teams will shy away from running a goalie if they know the Sabres will take a penalty in response. It's like Kaleta yapping at some roid case.
I give up, I don´t think that guy knows what a punch in the face feels like.
You protect the goalie. Intentional, unintentional, it makes no difference. Touching the tender is grounds for pummeling. Always.
Kessel was laughing getting up
Ennis needs to bury those chances. Good kill though, with Miller in top form.
I can't comprehend why other teams will shy away from running a goalie if they know the Sabres will take a penalty in response. It's like Kaleta yapping at some roid case.
And a guy running a Sabre goaltender as we've seen is going to result in penalties, interference faceoffs, and as the Flyers saw yesterday, lost goals. It isn't worth it.
****, if you can hit a guy in the face from behind you must have long arms
No he won't. He'll do the same and know that his team won't be down a man because someone will run him.
then you must not like any move we made this summer because all of them were so that guys would do exactly what Kaleta did. Its going in my post game G regardless of outcome
sigh....think bigger, like 60 minutes, flipping the guy over hmmm...forget it, never defend your goalie, your right.
****, if you can hit a guy in the face from behind you must have long arms
That's not necessarily the case. If Ott runs somebody after a clean hit it's not automatically a good thing because "toughness"