There WILL be pouting, lots of pouting!If that happens does DeBrusk go into a funk again because he's been demoted??
There WILL be pouting, lots of pouting!If that happens does DeBrusk go into a funk again because he's been demoted??
AJ Greer shouldn't have any expectations.
He's a plug who may carve out a role on the 4th line. We signed him to play well in the AHL. If he manages to even stay up in the NHL that's a win for me.
Nothing about his journey says that he has untapped offensive potential. He will not likely do well if he continues to play on the third line.
But we can dream.
I believe in the above clip from Monty he said "VISA" issues ongoing. Unlikely tomorrow.Anybody know if Stralman can play tomorrow?
I think it makes plenty of sense to try it, especially now, against a pitiful opposing team, while DeBrusk is out.We’re putting Lauko on the first line now?...
you're not doing wholesale changes in 72 hours....I think it makes plenty of sense to try it, especially now, against a pitiful opposing team, while DeBrusk is out.
HAL/BER/LAU
ZAC/KRE/PAS
FRE/COY/SMI
FOL/NOS(STU)/GRE
LIN/STR
REI/CAR
FOR/ZBO(CLI)
ULL
SWA
is there an update on Stralman's availability while it still matters?
Why do they have the young guy in Zboril playing his off side rather than the vet Reily?
Is he though? I mean the kid's got 55 NHL games under his belt and coming off a long layoff - Reily's got 300+games of experience.Because he might be better at it?
And Reilly has trouble on normal side.Because he might be better at it?
Easy answer: Some dmen are comfortable skating both sides, others aren’t. It’s not easy to play on your off wing (off side on D). It affects the way you receive passes amongst other things.Is he though? I mean the kid's got 55 NHL games under his belt and coming off a long layoff - Reily's got 300+games of experience.
they’ve been using Zboril on both sides of the ice for years in the NHL and AHL. iirc he even played the right side in juniors.Why do they have the young guy in Zboril playing his off side rather than the vet Reily? Cassidy did it too and it doesn't make sense to me.I
MO they're both playing for the same spot once McAvoy gets back and Stralman slots in on the right.
And Reilly has trouble on normal side.
Bruins NUMBAS Plan:
Trade:
To Boston: C Bo Horvat, F Michael Ferland, RHD Jett Woo
To Vancouver: RHD Brandon Carlo, C Charlie Coyle
Sign:
F David Pastrnak #88 - 8 Years, 88 Million, 11.0 AAV
C Bo Horvat #53 - 8 Years, 53 Million, 6.625 AAV
I can't see Larkin moving from Michigan as his entire life and entire hockey career has been there but if you traded for him instead you could:
Sign:
C Dylan Larkin #71 - 8 Years, 71 Million, 8.875 AAV
Winter, great talking pick with you again.Funny, I have also been trying to work out the Hovat + ??? for Carlo and Coyle deal.
I don't think you get Vancouver to bite unless you are taking back a worse contract than Ferland's. Coyle's contract isn't a positive value deal, and Horvat has more value than Carlo. OEL? I dunno how to make it work.
why does Vancouver do this?Bruins NUMBAS Plan:
Trade:
To Boston: C Bo Horvat, F Michael Ferland, RHD Jett Woo
To Vancouver: RHD Brandon Carlo, C Charlie Coyle
Sign:
F David Pastrnak #88 - 8 Years, 88 Million, 11.0 AAV
C Bo Horvat #53 - 8 Years, 53 Million, 6.625 AAV
I can't see Larkin moving from Michigan as his entire life and entire hockey career has been there but if you traded for him instead you could:
Sign:
C Dylan Larkin #71 - 8 Years, 71 Million, 8.875 AAV
Not great lol. I would have went with Carrickdan renouf looks like next man up. would've thought carrick was the guy. providence folks thoughts on renouf? haven't seen the guy much myself.
dan renouf looks like next man up. would've thought carrick was the guy. providence folks thoughts on renouf? haven't seen the guy much myself.