I get that the contract means the commitment is far longer with Gallagher, as he has five more years under contract versus one more year with Zucker. Yet to me, Gallagher is the better player and the idea that he would stand a good chance of thriving on another club has merit, finding himself in a new situation, playing with one of two elite centers.
I don't know. The risk that comes with the long contract likely makes it moot until such time as Gallagher is playing a good deal better, but I don't think he'd be a poor add for the Penguins. They certainly haven't seen much out of Zucker.
I don't know. The risk that comes with the long contract likely makes it moot until such time as Gallagher is playing a good deal better, but I don't think he'd be a poor add for the Penguins. They certainly haven't seen much out of Zucker.