TheTakedown
Puck is Life
- Jul 11, 2012
- 13,694
- 1,493
I'm sure he didn't mean anything by it. He was just listing a bunch of facts that he knows.
agreed. i wouldn't get your panties in a bunch over that, lol :p
I'm sure he didn't mean anything by it. He was just listing a bunch of facts that he knows.
Zucc's facebook page says "about 3 weeks". However they link a Daily News article that says it shouldn't be long and they don't have a timetable, I don't get it.
How is giving Callahan a long term contract then having him fall apart in a couple of years, rather than potentially getting young assets that can help us for years, not franchise changing?
What's the point of a comment like this? How angry are you abuot NHL players in the olympics? This is the best hockey any of us will see. As a Rangers fan sure, it's upsetting. As a hockey fan, it's amazing. I consider myself both, but i love the game first and foremost. Without it, we wouldn't have the Rangers.
What's the point of a comment like this? How angry are you abuot NHL players in the olympics? This is the best hockey any of us will see. As a Rangers fan sure, it's upsetting. As a hockey fan, it's amazing. I consider myself both, but i love the game first and foremost. Without it, we wouldn't have the Rangers.
This.But who am I to say what he should and shouldn't do?
According to Larry Brooks at the New York Post, Glen Sather is believed committed to dealing Ryan Callahan and/or Dan Girardi if unsigned to a contract extension by the trade deadline.
Brooks adds that Mats Zuccarello's hand injury, unless more severe than initially reported, will not have an impact on the Rangers decision making process on Callahan and Girardi.
The NHL roster freeze expires at midnight on Sunday night, with the trade deadline scheduled for March 5th.
...if Zuccarello is lost for at least three weeks and the Rangers trade Callahan they are literally left with Rick Nash as their only legit right winger. So I'm not so sure the Norwegian's injury isn't giving Sather a moment of pause, especially if he feels the Rangers have a serious chance of getting out of the wide open Eastern Conference.
What's the point of a comment like this? How angry are you abuot NHL players in the olympics? This is the best hockey any of us will see. As a Rangers fan sure, it's upsetting. As a hockey fan, it's amazing. I consider myself both, but i love the game first and foremost. Without it, we wouldn't have the Rangers.
It was a joke. The Olympics aren't the NHL playoffs. The best hockey is played in the NHL playoffs. 4 rounds. 16 wins. 2 months. That separates the men from the boys. War of attrition.
The Norwegian doctor described it as a stress fracture, a small crack in the bone. He said it should heal itself in a few days, and Zucc should be ready to play by the end of the month.
Can't be 3 weeks...
That's your opinion. Of which, I strongly disagree with. That Russia-USA game, was one of the best played hockey games in recent memory.
They are all star teams, going up against each other, playing with 110% effort.
So, we don't have any real news about Zucc today, just a bunch of speculation?
I just don't get where people come up with this all star team best hockey nonsense. Outside of 4 teams USA, Sweden, Canada and Russia all of the teams are a Mish mash of old, non nhlers etc.
It's like people don't recognize there are other teams besides those 4. So for teams with the luxury of choosing their squad from all nhlers you might have a point but most of the teams don't
And USA Russia wasn't some battle for the ages. It was a game settled by penalties and eventually a shoot out. I think people just see USA v Russia and start attributing all sorts if stuff to the game that really wasn't there.
I just don't get where people come up with this all star team best hockey nonsense. Outside of 4 teams USA, Sweden, Canada and Russia all of the teams are a Mish mash of old, non nhlers etc.
It's like people don't recognize there are other teams besides those 4. So for teams with the luxury of choosing their squad from all nhlers you might have a point but most of the teams don't
And USA Russia wasn't some battle for the ages. It was a game settled by penalties and eventually a shoot out. I think people just see USA v Russia and start attributing all sorts if stuff to the game that really wasn't there.
I just don't get where people come up with this all star team best hockey nonsense. Outside of 4 teams USA, Sweden, Canada and Russia all of the teams are a Mish mash of old, non nhlers etc.
It's like people don't recognize there are other teams besides those 4. So for teams with the luxury of choosing their squad from all nhlers you might have a point but most of the teams don't
And USA Russia wasn't some battle for the ages. It was a game settled by penalties and eventually a shoot out. I think people just see USA v Russia and start attributing all sorts if stuff to the game that really wasn't there.
Im just happy that the Isles got the worst of this