Why? He fits in with the age of Toews and Kane. The team is basically built around getting as much out of them and Keith as they can and dealing with the future beyond that when it happens.
Proposal: Zuccarello+ for Panarin
- Thread starter WesMcCauley
- Start date
Why? He fits in with the age of Toews and Kane. The team is basically built around getting as much out of them and Keith as they can and dealing with the future beyond that when it happens.
Pavel Buchnevich
"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
How much better is he? 5 points better? He's younger, he's better, and he has more value, but how much better is he? I don't think its that much, since Panarin wouldn't play with Patrick Kane on our team. I don't think its enough that I would want to give up our best prospect.
Pavel Buchnevich
"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
TLEH
Pronounced T-Lay
offensively he has great instincts, his skating is average and his puck moving is OK. not exactly the OFD ur looking for, but I think Panarin is a better player than zuc Like 10-12 points better
Pavel Buchnevich
"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
WesMcCauley
Registered User
- Apr 24, 2015
- 8,616
- 2,600
He is better and younger. Zucc is definetely the better defensive player but Panarin just had a crazy good offensive season with Kane. Lets just keep it at that. Gotta also remember that Zucc has a bargain contract, Panarin will seek a longterm big money deal.
Making a locker room guy a captain pales in comparison to New York constantly signing mistake after mistake, and doing whatever they can to bury their mistakes so they can make fresh, new mistakes.
Examples please, my good man!
DarthProbert
Registered User
- Feb 3, 2015
- 1,912
- 1,499
Rangers really don't have the cap for Panarin....assuming Panarin is going to have very good season and going to get about 7m.
If the Hawks trade Panarin or anyone to get cap space, maybe it makes more sense to them to get young "prospects" May not be of immediate help to the Hawks but such is the nature of a cap salaried system.
Carolina has cap space and need wingers....could the Canes offer a few young Dmen which they have "excess"
If the Hawks trade Panarin or anyone to get cap space, maybe it makes more sense to them to get young "prospects" May not be of immediate help to the Hawks but such is the nature of a cap salaried system.
Carolina has cap space and need wingers....could the Canes offer a few young Dmen which they have "excess"
ManofSteel55
Registered User
They don't save cap space directly, but they do get a pile of good depth players who make very fair salaries. Those are the types of players the Hawks need to get to move forward competitively now that Kane and Toews new contracts have started.
They wouldn't do a move like this now though. Maybe next summer if they feel a good offer of quality depth parts are there, but not now.
ManofSteel55
Registered User
Girardi
Staal
But they are now finding that it isn't easy to bury mistakes anymore because of the cap.
If Chicago decides to move Panarin for cap reasons, teams will line to give them some good, young cheap talent in return.
They won't be taking a collection of stuff costing them more than Panarin.
They would this as an opportunity to save cap space.
You can always find players making $2-3M who are decent middle players by simply taking on their contracts. They have little trade value on the market anymore.
The Hawks would want 1 young premium player who's cheaper but less established than Panarin. If the value was such that they needed more than that, they'd ask for draft picks.
They won't be taking a collection of stuff costing them more than Panarin.
They would this as an opportunity to save cap space.
You can always find players making $2-3M who are decent middle players by simply taking on their contracts. They have little trade value on the market anymore.
The Hawks would want 1 young premium player who's cheaper but less established than Panarin. If the value was such that they needed more than that, they'd ask for draft picks.
thedoughboy
Registered User
thedoughboy
Registered User
thats far from true. he isn't blazing fast by any means but your a little overzealous saying the slowest in the league
Richards too. That one I think anyone could see though. Thank god Burke surprisingly dodged that bullet.
DanielBrassard
It's all so tiresome
That's horrible for us. The difference between Zucc and Panarin is not one of the leaders in Primary assists per 60 over the past 2 years and a good bottom-6 forward
AtNightWeFly
You better run.
thedoughboy
Registered User
maybe not but the fact panarin is 24 and zucc is 29 compounded on how much better panarin is does
WesMcCauley
Registered User
- Apr 24, 2015
- 8,616
- 2,600
thedoughboy
Registered User
