- Jul 16, 2005
- 14,857
- 13,012
Then why not $30m or less? Just as realistic.
Why have an opinion at all? It's some people's opinion that this is too much. Saying "well it wasn't realistic to get him for less, so you must love it," isn't any better of an argument.
The post I was quoting was positing that we shouldn't care about the interplay between years and dollars because it's $68m one way or the other, so you can either slice it up as 8x8.5 or 7x9.7 or whatever.
Either of those outcomes is kind of bad for the team, especially with such a comprehensive NMC. I think that's a valid opinion, whether you share it or not.
The only way to make it more manageable would have been to have it simply been worth less money. If Zibanejad wouldn't have signed for less money, well, that may be, but we can still not like the deal.