hohosaregood
Banned
- Sep 1, 2011
- 33,716
- 14,623
Don't forget about RJ CelebriniHe frankly owes Ek. And then he can draft the 3rd and 4th Eklund brother. And 5th and 6th, I’m unclear how many there are but we must become the San Jose Eklunds.
Don't forget about RJ CelebriniHe frankly owes Ek. And then he can draft the 3rd and 4th Eklund brother. And 5th and 6th, I’m unclear how many there are but we must become the San Jose Eklunds.
I think it's plausible. Victor has a few factors working against him that often lead to falling in the draft.He frankly owes Ek. And then he can draft the 3rd and 4th Eklund brother. And 5th and 6th, I’m unclear how many there are but we must become the San Jose Eklunds.
I think it's plausible. Victor has a few factors working against him that often lead to falling in the draft.
-Generously listed 5'11"
-Winger
-October birthday
-Therefore can't play at the U18 this May (remember how Sharks scouts once hoped that other teams would forget about Tomas Hertl because his league season was done in March and he was too old to play the U18)
-Scouts can probably talk themselves into thinking his production was a product of Frondell
It wouldn't surprise me at all if he fell to around #11-14 like Jonathan Lekkerimaki. There's a whole list of guys I can see teams convincing themselves to take over Eklund. McQueen, Frondell, Desnoyers, O'Brien, Smith, Mrtka, Bear, Lakovic, Martin, etc. Guys with size, guys with more premium positions (C/D), guys who already play in North America.
If Eklund makes it out of the top-10, the Sharks need to do whatever it takes to get him.
We may need Hensler more but Eklund is on another level as a hockey player. They may go in the same range because Eklund is a 5'11" European winger and Hensler is a 6'2" American RHD, but Eklund is so much better.I do wonder if they’re going to go all defense and try to get like Hensler/Schaefer but who knows. If they can get Eklund with that 2nd pick it does seem like a huge get.
They’re replaceable, but there’s also another 10-12 players on the roster that need to be prioritized to be replaced. The only one I had an issue with was Fabian simply because of his age and his bond with the future core, which does indeed matter during these tough times despite what some here seem to think.Grier needs to prove that he can actually add impact players this offseason and improve the team quite noticeably. And I am not a fan of trading Zetterlund for scraps, myself. But people really need to chill with the whole, "How is he going to replace these guys???" thing. Walman, Sturm, Zetterlund etc are not irreplaceable. They are not the difference between an awful team and a bad team. Even when all of these guys were here and playing together, we were comfortably the worst team in the league in years.
Lets see what Grier does in the offseason. But I think we need to chill with the overreactions. You would think we just got rid of prime Dan Boyle and Patrick Marleau for scraps or something.
If we lose the lottery: 3OV (Hagens) to NYI for Dobson + 10OV (Eklund).
NYI get their pajama boy, we get our Eklund and our RHD.![]()
The cost to move up in weak drafts is lower, so there's some hope there.Grier also mentioned he liked Victor Eklund a lot. I understand why people are concerned but Eklund and Zetterlund are apples and oranges.
hes gonna repay him by shipping him to buffalo for Power. i know the board loves Byram but Powers 6'5 vs Byrams 6'1 so we should know who MG prefers.He frankly owes Ek. And then he can draft the 3rd and 4th Eklund brother. And 5th and 6th, I’m unclear how many there are but we must become the San Jose Eklunds.
And there's the A3Z microstats that confirm my eye test. I wonder what changed in Zetterlund's game that tanked his transition game.