JetsFan815
Replacement Level Poster
- Jan 16, 2012
- 19,643
- 25,639
The NHL has become so f***ed when we got bottom pairing guys acting indignant and demanding trades.
Weekes: Zadorov requested a trade
- Thread starter MMC
- Start date
- Status
stl76
No. 5 in your programs, No. 1 in your hearts
- Jul 2, 2015
- 9,438
- 8,982
Outside fan here but think you are a little high on market value for both Zadorov and Hanifan.
Hanifan I think you’re looking at 1st plus 2nd or OK prospect.
Zadorov I think you’re looking at two 2nds or maybe single 1st.
Could see a potential bidding war for either player, in which case all bets are off. Zadorov in particular I could see a bidding war driving the price up to a 1st + something small. Should be interesting to watch!
cwgatti
Registered User
- Mar 3, 2006
- 556
- 22
Should the New York Rangers look into this possibility? Lindgren is hurt again (he is no Dan Girardi when it comes to durability). NYR in a real jam right now.
Zach Jones &a 2nd & a 3rd
for
Zadorov (1/2 retained).
Zach Jones &a 2nd & a 3rd
for
Zadorov (1/2 retained).
I never mentioned anything about a 2nd round pick, I know they don't have that although I don't see that as a huge deal because I think Toronto has enough prospects to make it work.
Especially since Treliving has no ties to anybody except Cowan
Detroit Knights
Registered User
- Feb 29, 2012
- 3,602
- 2,105
This is why I wouldn't mind having him on the wings to see if it fits or not. We have chiarot who can just be a di*k when he feels like it and we have seider that can hold his own when he wants. Would love to have a player like zadorov who is probably defense first but can lay someone out if they mess with larkin or dbc etc.
I miss kronwall's hits...maybe this is me overcompensating
Ace Card Bedard
Back in Black, Red, and White
- Feb 11, 2012
- 9,059
- 4,049
SeanMoneyHands
Registered User
- Apr 18, 2019
- 15,221
- 14,533
Good thing the players don't run the team.
Zadorov would be a lot less than perfect for the Leafs.
DFF
Registered User
- Feb 28, 2002
- 22,440
- 6,665
Make no sense for Calgary unless the sweetener is a 1st+
Klinberg is straight up trash
Turning Mangiapanese
Registered User
- Jun 18, 2011
- 1,564
- 639
Nothingbutglass
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2017
- 4,665
- 4,108
Backlund
Registered User
No it doesn't. Why the f*** would we want Klingberg?
They don't, but if he were thrown in the deal for cap reasons, they wouldn't be giving them a first, maybe a a second?
DisgruntledHawkFan
Blackhawk Down
Zadorov is a fun bottom pairing defenseman but he's a bottom pairing defenseman.
Apex Predator
Registered User
- Jun 21, 2019
- 4,259
- 4,418
DFF
Registered User
- Feb 28, 2002
- 22,440
- 6,665
The 1st is for Zadorov my friend, especially if the Flames have to pick up Klinberg who has no value to them
You also have a GM who doesn’t value pick much
Nanuuk
Registered User
Zadorov for 2024 1st, Klingberg, and Abruzzesse.
Klingberg is a cap dump that equalizes salary in/out in the transaction.
The 1st is likely to be a late round pick that is slightly better than a high 2nd rounder.
Abruzzesse was a 2019 4th rounder that may be a tweener or may be ready to make the jump. He used to be Coronato's centreman in college.
Klingberg is a cap dump that equalizes salary in/out in the transaction.
The 1st is likely to be a late round pick that is slightly better than a high 2nd rounder.
Abruzzesse was a 2019 4th rounder that may be a tweener or may be ready to make the jump. He used to be Coronato's centreman in college.
Cousin Eddie
You Serious Clark?
- Nov 3, 2006
- 40,200
- 37,461
Sparksrus3
Registered User
- Jun 2, 2012
- 10,102
- 4,995
leave him in Toronto, he will suit up for us.
after his goal he should have skated to Leafs bench and sat down
Likely adds a sweetener?
That would need to be a significant sweetener added by Toronto if Calgary is taking Klingberg off their hands and trading them Zadorov.
Dack
Registered User
- Jun 16, 2014
- 3,948
- 3,627
As someone who didn't want or like Zadorov when the Flames traded for him I think he's progressed a lot. I think a lot of people are underrating him a bit in this thread, he has the highest xGF% of any Flames regular D-man this season.
He's not awful offensively anymore. For one, he's a very good puck carrier for a defenseman, a benefit of his massive wingspan. The Flames D get lots of touches in the offensive zone and he's good at keeping them alive and continuing the cycle. He'll sometimes skate with it as well to try and find a better lane or drive the net. On top of that he has a heavy shot and beats some goalies clean.
Defensively he's always been pretty good. He makes the occasional mistake but he's a consistently pretty good at shutting down the rush and very good at stopping cycles by virtue of his size and reach.
Overall I think he's a solid 4/5 option. I don't think he'd be a detriment on a 2nd pairing if played with a good player at this point and if he had chemistry with the player they could form a very good 2nd pairing.
He's not awful offensively anymore. For one, he's a very good puck carrier for a defenseman, a benefit of his massive wingspan. The Flames D get lots of touches in the offensive zone and he's good at keeping them alive and continuing the cycle. He'll sometimes skate with it as well to try and find a better lane or drive the net. On top of that he has a heavy shot and beats some goalies clean.
Defensively he's always been pretty good. He makes the occasional mistake but he's a consistently pretty good at shutting down the rush and very good at stopping cycles by virtue of his size and reach.
Overall I think he's a solid 4/5 option. I don't think he'd be a detriment on a 2nd pairing if played with a good player at this point and if he had chemistry with the player they could form a very good 2nd pairing.
- Status
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
HOH Top 60 Goaltenders of All Time (2024 Edition) - Round 2, Vote 5- Latest: jigglysquishy
-
