Zach Trotman | Page 3 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Zach Trotman

For one year. JB was a JAG in the minors until he broke out at the age of 24/25 with Providence.

To me, Trotman is JB-lite. Not as heavy, doesn't have as big of a shot, doesn't nail people as much, but he has all those JB elements to his game and he's actually much more rounded defensively at this age than JB was. I think he'll carve himself a good career as a solid top 4 defensive dman

Do you think he will end up being a top4 D with the Bruins?
I hope not.

I don't get these JB comparisons, JB was JB because of the hits and shot.
 
Last edited:
For one year. JB was a JAG in the minors until he broke out at the age of 24/25 with Providence.

To me, Trotman is JB-lite. Not as heavy, doesn't have as big of a shot, doesn't nail people as much, but he has all those JB elements to his game and he's actually much more rounded defensively at this age than JB was. I think he'll carve himself a good career as a solid top 4 defensive dman

Gotta disagree there, I don't see Trotmen ever being more than a 5 -6 guy.
 
Do you think he will end up being a top4 D with the Bruins?
I hope not.

I don't get these JB comparisons, JB was JB because of the hits and shot.


Neither is tremendously mobile, but I think JB has him there too.
 
I really just don't see that much potential in Trotman. Seems to me he's a fringe NHLer, someone who is likely to max out as a 6th/7th D type. I hope I'm wrong though.
 
trotman over K.Miller/Mcquaid

Time has come to play Trotman instead of K.Miller/McQuaid.
Mcquaid should have never been resigned.
Mcquaid and K. Miller are so alike that it is scary to know we play them both at the same time
They should be our bottom 5 or 6 defenceman.
 
Time has come to play Trotman instead of K.Miller/McQuaid.
Mcquaid should have never been resigned.
Mcquaid and K. Miller are so alike that it is scary to know we play them both at the same time
They should be our bottom 5 or 6 defenceman.

Over McQuaid??? McQuaid leads the defense in +/- on a horribly minus team, and he and Krug have been our steadiest pair. Starting Trotman over McQuaid would be stupid. Actually starting anyone except Chara over McQuaid would be stupid.
 
Time has come to play Trotman instead of K.Miller/McQuaid.
Mcquaid should have never been resigned.
Mcquaid and K. Miller are so alike that it is scary to know we play them both at the same time
They should be our bottom 5 or 6 defenceman.

K.Miller is now the weak link but I prefer him with Morrow more than Trotman.
 
Time has come to play Trotman instead of K.Miller/McQuaid.
Mcquaid should have never been resigned.
Mcquaid and K. Miller are so alike that it is scary to know we play them both at the same time
They should be our bottom 5 or 6 defenceman.

Disagree.

Putting in Trotman over either player won't help because Trotman isn't as good as either guy.


The problem is that K. Miller and McQuaid are playing higher (more minutes) than where they should be slotted.

I shudder to think about the damage Trotman could do with that many minutes.

Putting in a lesser player isn't the answer. Finding a guy who can push those two down to where they belong on the depth chart is the answer.
 
Disagree.

Finding a guy who can push those two down to where they belong on the depth chart is the answer.

This is true. They can either try and do it now, via the trade route, or wait for youth to develop and take those slots.

This is where we get into the assessment/patience game. No sense in making a deal that fills a #3 or #4 slot and makes you only marginally better as a team when the team still has zero chance to do anything, especially if you believe you're prospects are going to pan out in a couple years.

I expect the FO to wait and see what the TEAM looks like over the next 15-20 games before trying to fill a particular need. If the FO is convinced they're going nowhere, keep developing the youngsters, bide time, etc.
 
Disagree.

Putting in Trotman over either player won't help because Trotman isn't as good as either guy.


The problem is that K. Miller and McQuaid are playing higher (more minutes) than where they should be slotted.

I shudder to think about the damage Trotman could do with that many minutes.

Putting in a lesser player isn't the answer. Finding a guy who can push those two down to where they belong on the depth chart is the answer.



Perfectly said our problem isn't who is playing its we don't have high end defenseman at this time.
 
Disagree.

Putting in Trotman over either player won't help because Trotman isn't as good as either guy.


The problem is that K. Miller and McQuaid are playing higher (more minutes) than where they should be slotted.

I shudder to think about the damage Trotman could do with that many minutes.

Putting in a lesser player isn't the answer. Finding a guy who can push those two down to where they belong on the depth chart is the answer.


I agree with almost all of this, except the bolded. I think Trotman is just as good/better than K Miller and has more upside.


Also, the stuff earlier about JB55 being more mobile than Trotman is way off.
 
I agree with almost all of this, except the bolded. I think Trotman is just as good/better than K Miller and has more upside.


Also, the stuff earlier about JB55 being more mobile than Trotman is way off.


Personally, I don't think either is anything special, but I certainly don't think Trotman is better. IMO on a legit contender, Miller is a 7, while Trotman is an 8/9.

But at least Miller brings some toughness.

I've yet to see anything in Trotman that makes me think any differently and in fact, he's played some of the worst games I've seen a B's defenseman play in 8-10 years.
 
I'm going to predict now Trotman is in our top four by the end of the year. He has the tools I think he puts it all together this year. He has looked really decent the last two games.
 
I'm going to predict now Trotman is in our top four by the end of the year. He has the tools I think he puts it all together this year. He has looked really decent the last two games.

How do you then see our D group?

I doubt Julien is willing to put one of Krug/Seidenberg into 3rd pairing.
 
How do you then see our D group?

I doubt Julien is willing to put one of Krug/Seidenberg into 3rd pairing.

I think Seids ends up on the third pairing. I just don't think he is going to be any better than last year.
 
How do you then see our D group?

I doubt Julien is willing to put one of Krug/Seidenberg into 3rd pairing.

I think K. Miller ends up on the outside when Seids returns, and unless Claude comes to terms with reality I think Morrow has already lost his spot.

Chara-C. Miller
Krug-McQuaid
Seidenberg-Trotman

But I don't think it will be strictly those lines. I think Trotman will see time at the end of games with Chara and I think the Seids-Trotman and Krug-McQuaid pairings will see similar amounts of time.

I don't think we will be unhappy with this D either. I'd like to believe Seidenberg is bought out or traded in the offseason and Morrow gets the spot full time.
 
I think K. Miller ends up on the outside when Seids returns, and unless Claude comes to terms with reality I think Morrow has already lost his spot.

Chara-C. Miller
Krug-McQuaid
Seidenberg-Trotman

But I don't think it will be strictly those lines. I think Trotman will see time at the end of games with Chara and I think the Seids-Trotman and Krug-McQuaid pairings will see similar amounts of time.

I don't think we will be unhappy with this D either. I'd like to believe Seidenberg is bought out or traded in the offseason and Morrow gets the spot full time.

I hope Trotman doesn't get time with Chara, Colin has been practising with Chara for weeks now and has higher ceiling than Trotman so I would like to let him develop with Chara and be his full time partner soon and maybe, maybe with luck get an answer to that pairing question.

Seids on the LD side doesn't solve us anything.

But we agree on that Kevan should be out of the lineup no matter what.
 
Last edited:
Time has come to play Trotman instead of K.Miller/McQuaid.
Mcquaid should have never been resigned.
Mcquaid and K. Miller are so alike that it is scary to know we play them both at the same time
They should be our bottom 5 or 6 defenceman.

Not over McQuaid but over K Miller ,yes and it isn't that I am particularly a huge fan of Trotman but he looked good in the last game he played and towards the end of last year . Talk about bad luck being paired with Irwin in the first few games .
 
Over McQuaid??? McQuaid leads the defense in +/- on a horribly minus team, and he and Krug have been our steadiest pair. Starting Trotman over McQuaid would be stupid. Actually starting anyone except Chara over McQuaid would be stupid.

Actually, 3rd (behind Chara & C Miller) on an overall plus team.
 
I think K. Miller ends up on the outside when Seids returns, and unless Claude comes to terms with reality I think Morrow has already lost his spot.

Chara-C. Miller
Krug-McQuaid
Seidenberg-Trotman

But I don't think it will be strictly those lines. I think Trotman will see time at the end of games with Chara and I think the Seids-Trotman and Krug-McQuaid pairings will see similar amounts of time.

I don't think we will be unhappy with this D either. I'd like to believe Seidenberg is bought out or traded in the offseason and Morrow gets the spot full time.

It literally sickens me that Trotman is dressed over Morrow. Morrow is the future. The difference in their skill level and upside is not even close. I have no idea what they are doing in this case.

When Seidenberg comes back it should be:

Chara, Seidenberg, C. Miller, Morrow, Krug, McQuaid, (K. Miller)

Trotman to Providence.
 
It literally sickens me that Trotman is dressed over Morrow. Morrow is the future. The difference in their skill level and upside is not even close. I have no idea what they are doing in this case.

When Seidenberg comes back it should be:

Chara, Seidenberg, C. Miller, Morrow, Krug, McQuaid, (K. Miller)

Trotman to Providence.

Trotman isn't clearing waiver.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad