Tobias Kahun
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2017
- 45,575
- 57,314
There’s no LTIR at this tourney, he’ll still play.Mark Stone is due to get injured again any day now, so Hyman can take his spot.
There’s no LTIR at this tourney, he’ll still play.Mark Stone is due to get injured again any day now, so Hyman can take his spot.
It’s a reference to thisThis thread is super weird
That 5.8% was coming off his stick, no?Yep, a 5.8% SH% will do that to you over those first 20. Last year he was 18% in the reg season and 17.7% in playoffs. 13% the season before.
He's up to 14.3% now on the year which is much closer to normal production for him.
its the pendulum swinging the other way. Oiler fans eat so much shit here on the mains. People tell us all the time that we will regret certain players, that we suck, that we cant win, that a minior losing streak is a sign we suck. We have people in the mains GDT using every little thing to put us down.
Soooooooo
if youre gonna dish it, your gonna eat it. Dont want to see this stuff? a) ignore oiler fans, b)stop talking shit about us.
He's the heart and soul of the Oil. Brings it every shift and every game. Not too shabby for the "worst contract in NHL history".
Said no one ever. Who are you quoting here? Or just creating a straw man argument as many here tend to do
Said no one ever. Who are you quoting here? Or just creating a straw man argument as many here tend to do
Wasn't the popular discourse was that he would be out of the league in 3 year because of the style of hockey he was playing.He's the heart and soul of the Oil. Brings it every shift and every game. Not too shabby for the "worst contract in NHL history".
I'd argue chemistry is just as important in roster selection as talent is in these short tournamentsTrue hockey player and the epitome of a top line complimentary player.
He didn’t get “snubbed” by Team Canada. Form and health play a part in selecting rosters for tournaments.
I mean, great for him and the Oilers if he’s using some fake narrative as motivation - most of the great do it…but snubbed? Nah. Not when you have the array of talent Canada has to pick from.
I’m not misquoting him in a substantive way. And his take was not unique at the time. It was the opinion of many in the Leaf’s community that it was a bad contract. The main reason cited is that his legs would fall off at some time due to injury history and no one predicted he would produce as much as he has during this contract.Ah, so you're quoting one random Twitter account with 1k followers and acting like this opinion is held by a large percentage of hockey fans or somehow important in any way? Actually you're misquoting him not that it matters.
they'll never get it. They'll just keep moving the goalposts, going from "no one said that" *shows proof* "oh thats nothing, hes just some guy* to "so what"I’m not misquoting him in a substantive way. And his take was not unique at the time. It was the opinion of many in the Leaf’s community that it was a bad contract. The main reason cited is that his legs would fall off at some time due to injury history and no one predicted he would produce as much as he has during this contract.
I can guarantee if I dig I could quote many around here who said similar. In fact even a year or two after the contract they’d still be saying it, in the slim hopes that it becomes true.they'll never get it. They'll just keep moving the goalposts, going from "no one said that" *shows proof* "oh thats nothing, hes just some guy* to "so what"
That take was very prevalent around here during the offseason we signed him, it was even brought when he got off to his unlucky start.
Same. Was sad when Ekholm and Arvidsson got picked for Sweden. Hope McDavid stubs his toe or something so he can't go, but I know there's no way he'd pass up finally being able to play for Canada. Tournament probably ends up being a glorified all-star game anyways though so hopefully nobody gets hurt.I would rather no Oilers played in this, it’s a pointless tournament that only increases wear and tear on guys.
I’m not misquoting him in a substantive way. And his take was not unique at the time. It was the opinion of many in the Leaf’s community that it was a bad contract. The main reason cited is that his legs would fall off at some time due to injury history and no one predicted he would produce as much as he has during this contract.
Essentially. It was a lot of “he’s already had two knee surgeries!” talk.Wasn't the popular discourse was that he would be out of the league in 3 year because of the style of hockey he was playing.
Absolute warrior
Ah, so you're quoting one random Twitter account with 1k followers and acting like this opinion is held by a large percentage of hockey fans or somehow important in any way? Actually you're misquoting him not that it matters.
Yeah sure. But you look at the quality of chances and past results and you know it's going to correct and it has.That 5.8% was coming off his stick, no?
It was a joke post referncing that lame Montreal writers rich dad complaint lasy year. The post is meant to give Hyman his deserved flowers. He's battling through a broken nose and playing well after a tough start.I smell the insecurity from all the way here.
Jeeeeez
Onto your point. It is hilarious that the GM talked about chemistry with his D pairings yet ignores how much chemistry Hyman has with McDavid.....Some interesting choices.
I've followed Zach Hyman's career for a long time, and he won me over long ago, but I've never heard the anti-Semitism angle before.Much of the hate for this guy is anti-semitism. The typical "oh rich Jewish guy buying up everything" kinda nonsense. He had advantages of course, but are we going to pretend that all the sons of millionaire NHL players getting drafted every year had to bootstrap their way through youth hockey as underdogs? Nah, they were all fast tracked onto the best teams, had special access to the best coaches and facilities, extra ice time, etc. Hockey is a rich kid sport and because of its more technical nature also one where having the right connections goes a long way.