Habs 4 Life
No Excuses
Should have been more. At least 15 games would have been what I would have gave him, especially after his interview after the game thinking he was a hero about it.
Sure I am biased, but am I in charge of determining suspensions in the NHL?Speaking of obvious bias...
Sure I am biased, but am I in charge of determining suspensions in the NHL?
Nope. Pronger is tho..
No injury aside from Letang did not finish that game as well as missed the following game the next night....
What a majority of people here seem to ignore is the cumulative effect of hits. This hit may have kept him out of a few games but the type of hit could have long term repercussions. This IMO is why the penalty should be severe.
I understand that this game is violent and there is no way to measure long term effects.
The hit was intentional . Repeat offender = 1 year ban.....
It's already been explained to you and everyone else that Pronger is not allowed to make rulings on anything involved with the Flyers.
And even if he were able to rule on the Flyers, do you really think he would risk his professional reputation in his first job post-playing career to protect Zac Rinaldo of all people?
Be reasonable here.
Yeah, pretty unprecedented for a year ban. And like it or not, the league has been clear on considering degree of injury in a suspension. I don't like the practice either to be less severe on a player who is both dirty and clumsy.
Let me be clear . I have never played the game . I understand the hitting but where does the league draw the line. If they want to send a message i feel that banning for a year would be very clear. IMO
( Repeat offenders with intent to harm another player) Set up criteria and stick with it!
Also interesting seeing people in the Rinaldo hit threads and the Neal hit threads with some inconsistent viewpoints on what's a dirty hit and what's not.
Also interesting seeing people in the Giroux hit threads and the Neal hit threads with some inconsistent viewpoints on what's a dirty hit and what's not.
Oh ya that's right, the flyers captain intentionally headshot zubrus, how convenient that is to forget.
Sure I am biased, but am I in charge of determining suspensions in the NHL?
Nope. Pronger is tho..
Also interesting seeing people in the Giroux hit threads and the Neal hit threads with some inconsistent viewpoints on what's a dirty hit and what's not.
Oh ya that's right, the flyers captain intentionally headshot zubrus, how convenient that is to forget.
It's way too high, it's only cause it's Rinldo that it's so much.
This is what happens when you have Chris Pronger (who is still being paid by the Flyers) in charge of meting out penalties to the Flyers.
Don't have to be a genius to identify that this is a CLASSIC conflict of interest scenario.
ANYONE would be biased in that scenario. It's just a shame the NHL has the incompetence to hire Pronger in the first place.
It's nice that a Flyer is on the committee. Yeah, he doesn't make any judgements on Flyers. Uh-huh. Yeah.
He is just work buddies with the guys that do.
This league is a farce.
Also interesting seeing people in the Giroux hit threads and the Neal hit threads with some inconsistent viewpoints on what's a dirty hit and what's not.
Oh ya that's right, the flyers captain intentionally headshot zubrus, how convenient that is to forget.
It's way too high, it's only cause it's Rinldo that it's so much.
One of the few guys who should be considered for a life time ban or forced institution. Guys a serial killer waiting to happen.
Also interesting seeing people in the Giroux hit threads and the Neal hit threads with some inconsistent viewpoints on what's a dirty hit and what's not.
Oh ya that's right, the flyers captain intentionally headshot zubrus, how convenient that is to forget.