Hockeyfan2390
Registered User
I'd rather win Stanley cups
In order to win the Cup, you need to learn how to play in the playoffs. That's why yes, the Red Wings absolutely had to qualify for the postseason this year.
What This Means for You:
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord ServerI'd rather win Stanley cups
Top pairing minutes in GR, plays on both special teams units, that's exactly what the organization wants from their prospects in the AHL. You're setting yourself up for failure if you have to sign a mid d-man in free agency for 4 years at $5m or more per season.I'd hope so , hes 23 if hes not there hes a failure.... our problem is getting rid of holl gustafsson and if it we're possible chiarot
Much rather target like a romanov/miller to be seider's pairing dman and be a piece of the future longterm .... maybe we somehow land Schaeffer although that could cause headaches cap wise if pellika is also a star as we hope
Anyways we need to subtract some pieces and stop adding patchwork before we waste seider and Raymond's current contract years
Then why are you suggesting a downgrade?
As no interest in just being content being there and bowing out quickly. Seider is a winner ... our problem is giving out a bunch of contracts to the same garbage players which a lot of ppl seemed to love at the time for god knows what reasonIn order to win the Cup, you need to learn how to play in the playoffs. That's why yes, the Red Wings absolutely had to qualify for the postseason this year.
Cool I hope wallinder is a stud , not impressed with his offensive numbers and not sure he can be seider’s partner. I see him as a 3rd pairing guyTop pairing minutes in GR, plays on both special teams units, that's exactly what the organization wants from their prospects in the AHL. You're setting yourself up for failure if you have to sign a mid d-man in free agency for 4 years at $5m or more per season.
Never said Wallinder would play alongside Seider, just said he's playing top mins for GR.Cool I hope wallinder is a stud , not impressed with his offensive numbers and not sure he can be seider’s partner. I see him as a 3rd pairing guy
Free agency is what’s killed this team cause we gave bad contracts. Romanov and Miller aren’t free agents so I don’t know where you think I said it was what’s needed. If the right players make free agency sure but don’t just sign just anyone and longterm
If we could get Tavares 2 yrs 16 mill I’d do it cause it’s 2 yrs and we can afford to do it now. He loves Toronto so he won’t leave and will take 5 mil x 4 probably. I’d give Marchand same deal but again why would he love Florida now for Detroit ?
Trades and free agency is the only choice for us atm unless you want to pay a ridiculous sum for an ehlers who’s always injured
I agree SY will do what he thinks is best for the team, he will have options, but the FA frenzy with the rising cap is likely to be simply insane I fear.You articulated this far better than I have been able to. I don't want to close the door on us doing some shopping or dealing, but this is the path I see as way more likely. And it's one I would be excited to see if the Wings actually embrace shoving a bunch of kids into the lineup. I do like @Snuggs suggestion of going after Pionk.
With the number and quality of prospects the Wings have, they have some nice wiggle room for how they want to approach the summer.
I think we're more likely to sign a D than a forward. Looking at the trade board here and a lot of people seem pretty comfortable saying Ehlers is going to pull $10 million with a longer term. I would guess Boeser would be similar. I don't think they are guys Yzerman will be really interested in, especially given his comments about wanting to get tougher to play against, and us having a bunch of forwards prospects right on the cusp of making it.
I'm expecting something far closer to what @LongTimeDRWF outlines above. And if that happens, I'm not going to complain about it. I think it would make for an exciting season seeing a bunch of kids establishing themselves.
How many players aren’t in the NHL in their D+5 and putting up okay but not great AHL numbers end up being anywhere good enough to be top pair or even top 4D in the NHL?Top pairing minutes in GR, plays on both special teams units, that's exactly what the organization wants from their prospects in the AHL. You're setting yourself up for failure if you have to sign a mid d-man in free agency for 4 years at $5m or more per season.
Albert Johansson?How many players aren’t in the NHL in their D+5 and putting up okay but not great AHL numbers end up being anywhere good enough to be top pair or even top 4D in the NHL?
okay fair enoughEhlers has scored 30 goals...never. Boeser has done it...once. You're already setting yourself up to be angry at these signings expecting them to do things they just don't have a history of doing.
Hutson is on pace for the fifth best offensive season of all time by a rookie dman and is a key part of a team that was supposed to be bad but is in a playoff spot, not sure that's a downgrade.
Gonna add to this, that we have maximized our most valuable draft capital to probably the best we really could have realistically done, so far. We have built the team with our own assets and grown them to be what carries us. I think it's much more resourceful doing that than having to overswing on useful players in trades or Free Agency to carry your franchiseI actually think Yzerman has the organization in an excellent position moving forward. Has he been perfect? No, but despite that this team is well built for a long term competitive timeline.
- Larkin Ray and Seider locked up on good value contracts
- Kasper and Edvinsson are looking like legit top half of the lineup kind of players.
- More than 21 Million in cap space with no critical free agents (probably needs to keep or replace Kane to progress this thing).
- One of the best prospect pools in the league.
- A couple extra draft picks to wheel and deal.
This year might be a lateral move/step back but in the grand scheme I believe he has made a lot of progress and has laid an excellent foundation to be a competitive team moving forward.
I appreciate its been a slow burn but this team is well positioned for big things imo. While I would like to see Yzerman get aggressive this summer (and even this past trade deadline) I disagree with the urgency that some express.
This team has been knocking on the playoff door two years in a row while its most important players are either locked up on good contracts or have 4+ years of RFA control. That’s a good thing in my opinion. We’re close, set up well for the long term and Yzerman has both the room and ammunition to add.
Yzerman should be looking to make an aggressive move to bolster this rebuild. His picks and prospects should all be in play for a top 6 forward/top 3 D/Long term starter.
The thing is, I’m okay with this big swing happening any time over the next year or so. This draft/mid next season/2026 TDL/2026 offseason are all reasonable timelines for a big move to bolster the long term trajectory of this rebuild.
Yzerman should be aggressive at every opportunity to add a top player but I don’t think he should irresponsibly overpay.
Offer Marner 14 mil? Sure.
Shop a mid round pick to offload Gus/Holl/Tank? Go for it.
Bundle a 1st + Berggren/Soderblom + 2nd + a top prospect (exclude Danielson/ASP unless we’re talking about a superstar/bonafide young 1st liner)? I’m all in.
I see those as aggressive moves that are worthwhile. The problem is Marner might not take our money or a team like Utah might offer Max Salary. It might cost a 2nd or more to unload one of those contracts (Holl/Gus/Tank) which is too much imo. A team like the sharks/Ducks/etc might offer a better/more attractive package for that star player we want (Zegras/McTavish + a better 1st + Sennecke + a better 2nd).
For those reasons plus the good long term foundation I believe it’s important to understand the big swing might not and does not need to happen this summer.
I’d love to sign Marner for 14ish aav. I’d love to package a 1st + Danielson + for Kyle Connor. I’d like to see someone like Chychrun/Provorov signed but you also have to accept that your offer might not work out. This is why I’m okay with the big move being at the 2026 TDL/2026 offseason as well.
You dont always get what you want. That’s called real life. Stay patient, stay aggressive but don’t overreact.
You think AJ is playing anywhere near a top 4 or top pair on a playoff team this season? Please point to whoAlbert Johansson?
You must not have seen him play defense. If Hughes and Makar are the Coffey and Bourque of this generation, then Hutson might be the Phil Housley. Seider would be the Chelios.
NHL Most Points Rookie Defenceman Season | StatMuse
Right now he’s at 14th best rookie season in part because Makar and Hughes had theirs during the Covid shortened season. It’s impressive that he’s only the 4th defenseman since 1992-93 to get 50+ points in a rookie season. Mo Seider was the 3rd.
I’ll take the all around defenseman over the offensive D that feasts on mismatches and bad teams.
I think he has a good chance to "end up" being a top 4 guy, which is what you initially asked for. You didn't ask "how many become top 4 or top pair on a playoff team in their rookie season".You think AJ is playing anywhere near a top 4 or top pair on a playoff team this season? Please point to who
He plays over 20 minutes a game but sure all his production is due to mismatches and bad teams lol. And he is not just a 50+ point rookie dman (and Seider has yet to hit 50 pts again ), he will be a 60+ pt dman in his rookie year and is at the same pace as Quinn Hughes was in his rookie year, but I guess a guy like Ekholm is better than Hughes because he's bigger and better defensively.
Hutson is 8th in defense scoring and has more than 65% of his starts in the O-zone with only a corsi for of 50.7%. xGF/60 of 2.9 and xGA/60 of 2.88. He’s not the guy taking tough matchups on his team. That’s David Savard.
Seider is tied for 19th in defense scoring and has to carry Chiarot and only has 45.9% of his starts in the o-zone. Seider’s cf% is 50.1%. xGF/60 of 2.29 xGA/60 of 2.42. He is Detroit’s shutdown defender AND top scoring D. If he wasn’t tied to trash and forced to take every tough matchup because an ECHL level 3rd pairing you’d see Seider closer to the top 10 in defense scoring.
If you think Hutson is a better defenseman than Seider based only on point totals then I don’t know what to tell you.
Feels like you're trolling, but fact is if Hutson wasn't producing offensively he wouldn't be in the NHL. Scoring ~10 more points than Seider did as a rookie is almost nothing considering how much less valuable he is in all other areas. It's not much different than the people who argued in favor of Zegras during that rookie season. The offensive advantage simply isn't big enough to warrant ignoring all the weaknesses, and time has shown that to be true. Hutson might become an 80-90 point d-man. But when ALL other outcomes than the absolute max lands him as a less valuable player it's a big gamble to put your money on.I think he's a better player not just based on points this season, but because it's his rookie season and he has shown he is much better offensively than Seider. In year 4, I wouldn't be surprised if he gets 80-90 points. Again, this is just his rookie year and he's putting up these numbers .
Yes it’s possible. The odds are incredibly low. And unless AJ seriously bulks up, he’s not going to be a top 4 on a contender.I think he has a good chance to "end up" being a top 4 guy, which is what you initially asked for. You didn't ask "how many become top 4 or top pair on a playoff team in their rookie season".
Gustav Forsling is the obvious example of one that's already proven it's possible.
Yes it’s possible. The odds are incredibly low. And unless AJ seriously bulks up, he’s not going to be a top 4 on a contender.
Forsling was already in the NHL in his D+3, so that example doesn’t even work.
Going 2g/16pts in 52 games in your D+5 im the AHL is very concerning if you’re hoping for a top 4 D, or slotting him next to Seider
Forsling wasn't a full-time NHLer until his d+5.Yes it’s possible. The odds are incredibly low. And unless AJ seriously bulks up, he’s not going to be a top 4 on a contender.
Forsling was already in the NHL in his D+3, so that example doesn’t even work.
Going 2g/16pts in 52 games in your D+5 im the AHL is very concerning if you’re hoping for a top 4 D, or slotting him next to Seider