Last year was indeed incredible, and like I’ve said repeatedly now if they keep this up they too will establish themselves among the game’s playoff greats. But it’s still a small sample size and heavily dependent on a single amazing postseason (which is why a minimum number of games matters when discussing such things), and when you’ve got guys like Kucherov and Point who have consistently put up numbers that rank them among the legends of the sport, the idea that McDavid and Draisaitl are “BY FAR” more valuable than them is simply ridiculous.
That’s ALL I’ve been saying here: that as good as McD is (and Drai for that matter), there are other players in the league who have accomplished more and are still playing at an elite level themselves, whose presence makes the notion of McDavid being “BY FAR” more valuable than anyone else rather absurd. He may well be the best player in the league, but even if he is the gap between him and Kucherov is by no means a large one. I don’t see why that’s such a controversial statement.