Year 1.5 into the rebuild, smashing success so far?

Keep it going?

  • Yes

    Votes: 72 91.1%
  • No

    Votes: 7 8.9%

  • Total voters
    79

stator

Registered User
Apr 17, 2012
5,035
1,023
San Jose
No. Grier's continuous bonehead decisions have prolonged this current rebuild by at least 2 years.

I like the guy and think he's a good choice for Sharks GM at this time. The only question I have about him is whether he can succeed when it's time to shift into competitive playoff team.

The only case I can make to support that 2 year prolongment is not placing Couture and Hertl on LTIR to get room to go after more competitive players. That might make the Sharks into a playoff, one and done team, but it would fester the needed rebuild.

It took Vancouver 9 years to rebuild and get back into the playoffs. I think Grier will beat that.
 

tiburon12

Registered User
Jul 18, 2009
4,681
4,526
I like the guy and think he's a good choice for Sharks GM at this time. The only question I have about him is whether he can succeed when it's time to shift into competitive playoff team.

The only case I can make to support that 2 year prolongment is not placing Couture and Hertl on LTIR to get room to go after more competitive players. That might make the Sharks into a playoff, one and done team, but it would fester the needed rebuild.

It took Vancouver 9 years to rebuild and get back into the playoffs. I think Grier will beat that.
Kinda, they made the play-in and won that round + another.
 

Stewie Griffin

What the deuce
May 9, 2019
5,003
7,972
Canada
I don't even think Van went through a real rebuild either.
They drafted in the top 10 quite a few times.
2021: 9th overall and traded it for Ekman Larsson + Garland
2019: Podkolzin
2018: Hughes
2017: Pettersson
2016: Juolevi
2014: Virtanen
2013: Horvat

Pettersson and Hughes are 2 of their biggest pieces. Along with Demko who they drafted and developed during this time frame. Imagine their team if they didn't get 2 of the biggest busts of the decade in Juolevi and Virtanen. Or just drafted Guenther in 2021 instead of trading the pick. Or drafted Boldy, Caufield, York, etc. instead of Podkolzin.

Either way, I'd call it a rebuild.
 

coooldude

Registered User
Jul 25, 2007
3,309
2,559
1715132331954.png
 

Jargon

Registered User
Apr 12, 2011
5,627
9,391
Venice, California
Grier has done fantastic work for the club. We need a number 1 D though. As of right now we're looking like Toronto's rebuild that's very forward heavy. I hope we don't rush out of this like Toronto and more recently LA did and still be looking for D.

Need to luck into Hensler or Schaefer next year.

While I agree that we should take BPA at 14, if we can trade up and grab someone like Buium, I’d do everything possible to make it happen. If not, I’d be swinging for D with both our 2nd rounders. We need to build that pipeline now and hopefully next season we get our defenseman version of Celebrini.
 

pappaf2

Registered User
Feb 24, 2009
1,981
645
Bay Area, CA
While I agree that we should take BPA at 14, if we can trade up and grab someone like Buium, I’d do everything possible to make it happen. If not, I’d be swinging for D with both our 2nd rounders. We need to build that pipeline now and hopefully next season we get our defenseman version of Celebrini.
If they could move up and snag Buium (without spending too much to do so) it would be incredible! Craig Button has him going at #10?!
 

matt trick

Registered User
Jun 12, 2007
9,794
1,400
It would be a dream. I’d do anything I could to get Buium.

Yup, I'd be pretty aggressive going for him. 14th, 33rd, 42nd, 85th, and next years 2nd could all be used. Not each asset of course, but that's a lot of draft capital to use. Leaving this draft with franchise C, and a top tier PMD prospect would be excellent. I'd be surprised if any of the top any of the top 6 D make it to 14, but I imagine at least one will be there at 10.

14th+42 for 11
11+33 for 7/8?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jargon

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad