Was there anything new in the Lebrun article for those that have the Athletic sub?
-ghoste
Truth:Yandles agent:
-doesnt have anything to do with performance
-this is GM putting pressure for Yandle to waive NMC.
I mean it's pretty damning when the GM says he is looking for accountability, effort and determination to win, and then in the same breath says Yandle might be scratched for the opener. Writing is on the wall imo.
Also, to be fair to Yands, there was a time in his career where he use to throw a mean hip check. Doesn't even do that anymore.
It’s funny how Brian Campbell was so highly regarded for being basically the same player Yandle is but Yandle is universally hated.
Zito has massive balls and I love it.All points from Zito's mouth.
-Q decides lineup
-strong possibility Yandle isn't in opening lineup
-Zito said they gave Yandle heads up about possible scratching early in camp, told him the direction they're headed
-difficult decision when Ironman streak was brought up, they respect it and don't take it lightly but they have responsibility to put best team on the ice, sometimes forced to make tough decisions
-has not asked Yandle to waive NMC
Yandles agent:
-doesnt have anything to do with performance
-this is GM putting pressure for Yandle to waive NMC.
I looked for Keith Yandle hit on YouTube, but only videos of him getting hit with the puck in the facecame up. I did find this video though:
I realized that. I just couldn't find any video evidence of him throwing a hit.I vividly recall when he took Pirri out, and this whole board wanted Gudbranson to beat him up. But yes, he is not known for his massive hits. Doesn't mean he has never hit someone before.
I challenge you to find even one time he hit someone in his Panthers career.Doesn't mean he has never hit someone before.
I challenge you to find even one time he hit someone in his Panthers career.
I just hope that other GMs are as dumb as the general hockey fan and still think Yandle is a good add. Maybe Zito should give Rutherford a ring...
That’s elder abuse at this point.I just hope that other GMs are as dumb as the general hockey fan and still think Yandle is a good add. Maybe Zito should give Rutherford a ring...
He’s not a bad add. I don’t know when the narrative around here became “Yandle sucks”, because he doesn’t.
Why? Because Yandle isn’t worth what he’s paid and because many are challenging the notion that he isn’t all that bad, give him a chance.Why?
Cold Cat posted saying he couldn't find any youtube videos of him making a hit.
I stated he has hit someone before, and gave him hitting Pirri as an example. As that is the one that I recall most vividly. I also said he is not known for his massive hits. Or indeed really hitting anyone at all. Doesn't mean he has never hit someone.
Inside scoop: they definitely areI just hope that other GMs are as dumb as the general hockey fan and still think Yandle is a good add. Maybe Zito should give Rutherford a ring...
I just hope that other GMs are as dumb as the general hockey fan and still think Yandle is a good add. Maybe Zito should give Rutherford a ring...
Why? Because Yandle isn’t worth what he’s paid and because many are challenging the notion that he isn’t all that bad, give him a chance.
He is bad, and a big part of the reason he is bad is because he stays away from physical play, which is a cornerstone of hockey.
Doesn't answer my question why I have to look for Yandle making hits in a Panthers jersey.
Everyone knows, including people who like Yandle, he isn't a physical defenseman. He never has been, and never will be. Me rating Yandle as a decent hockey player has nothing to do with how many hits he makes per game.
Cold Cat posted a video and noted he couldn't find a video of Yandle making a hit. I responded saying I do recall him making a hit on Pirri. And I even stated he is not someone who is know for making massive hits. Again, everyone knows this.
He is an offensive defenseman who scores a lot of points and is incredibly beneficially in the offensive zone. That imo, makes him a decent hockey player. Brian Campbell was also a player who didn't hit that much. But he was terrific player. Better than Yandle. Everytime someone was his partner in defense, he elevated their play. In other words, you don't have to make big hits to be a good player. You don't think Yandle is a good player. That's fine. I doubt me finding a couple of videos of him making a hit in a Panthers jersey is going to change your mind. I do think he is still a decent player, and the backlash is overblown.
If only you were the GM of an NHL franchise, I would marry you for thinking Yandle is useful...![]()
Wasn't the 52-Bomber Campbell's defense partner when he was in Florida? I don't think Garrison was ever the same when he left Florida. He played like an All-Star that one season. I think he touched 20 goals? * edit it was only 16 goals.Doesn't answer my question why I have to look for Yandle making hits in a Panthers jersey.
Everyone knows, including people who like Yandle, he isn't a physical defenseman. He never has been, and never will be. Me rating Yandle as a decent hockey player has nothing to do with how many hits he makes per game.
Cold Cat posted a video and noted he couldn't find a video of Yandle making a hit. I responded saying I do recall him making a hit on Pirri. And I even stated he is not someone who is know for making massive hits. Again, everyone knows this.
He is an offensive defenseman who scores a lot of points and is incredibly beneficially in the offensive zone. That imo, makes him a decent hockey player. Brian Campbell was also a player who didn't hit that much. But he was terrific player. Better than Yandle. Everytime someone was his partner in defense, he elevated their play. In other words, you don't have to make big hits to be a good player. You don't think Yandle is a good player. That's fine. I doubt me finding a couple of videos of him making a hit in a Panthers jersey is going to change your mind. I do think he is still a decent player, and the backlash is overblown.