He's a scratch
I can't be too disappointed though, it seems his conditioning isn't *quite* up to a full nhl season yet (and that's not a knock on the kid, he's only 18 and doing extremely well for a rookie in my estimation) so a little rest could be good for him. Just being able to practice with the likes of Datsyuk, Malkin, Ovie should be good for him; and I'm sure it's also nice for a foreign rookie to be able to visit "home" during the middle of the season.
Dat Nuke goal
Apparently I was very wrong, could have sworn I read that. Just saw his goal in the highlights after the USA game - I would have watched live if I had known he was playing. Good for Val, I'll have to go back and watch it now.
So now he youngest russian who scores at olimpics
I didn't realize the Olympics were played across an entire continent for 6 to 8 months. I mean seriously ... you're going to argue 3 or 4 additional refs is cost prohibitive? That seems like a reasonable argument to you? We're talking about 2 weeks here ... at a central location ... that happens once every 4 years. Even the AHL tries to use two refs when they can and money would be a reasonable argument where they are concerned.
I wonder who is younger overall in history?
There were fewer refs than is usual for a men's game. What better explanation can you give?
You can bet we'll be in for thousands of garbage trade proposals for Nichushkin if he has a really good Olympics.
Should be fun.
I would say poor decisions on someones part. According to this website, the best league in the world, the NHL, pays their top refs about $255,000 a year or $2,682 per game. The average ref makes much less at about $1,402 per game.
If you're telling me that one of the most popular sports in the Olympics (at least the men's version) can't afford likely significantly less than that per game so that the most important hockey games in the world outside of league championships can get called fairly and accurately, that's BS. They're making more than enough at the door to cover that cost for the men and the women. There is no reasonable explanation to not have two refs ... that's the point. First and foremost money.
I don't know what we're arguing about at this point. Women's hockey is less important than men's hockey and thus has fewer refs. You can dissect it any way you want but the fact is nobody really watches women's hockey on TV and few attend the games.
I could also say, Russia. But would that be the imperialist American in me? A lot of things about these Olympics have been a joke, including the accommodations for journalists and visitors. All of that eventually comes down to money. Everything always comes down to money. Where else would you look for answers?
http://vk.com/video-485344_167576342?hd=3&t=4s
can you watch it ?