Toggle sidebar

WWE: WWE TV - Raw & Smackdown Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
BruinDust

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,753
25,335
Unholy Diver said:
Interesting that they were considering taking the belt off of Gunther on a tv match, has the feud with him and Jey even been going on very long?

www.ringsidenews.com

WWE Seemingly Made Last-Minute Change to Jey Uso Match on 2/19 RAW

Jimmy and Jey Uso have been feuding since Jimmy Uso betrayed Jey at SummerSlam last year. Even on RAW this week, Jimmy ended up costing Jey Uso a big
www.ringsidenews.com
Click to expand...

WWE are doing a heck of a job working the "insiders" and "dirt-sheets".

Jimmy vs. Jey at WM was always the plan.

Jey will win the IC title later this year clearly but it was never going to be on a random Raw before WM.
 

FriendlyGhost92

Registered User
Jun 22, 2023
4,548
5,466
Unholy Diver said:
Interesting that they were considering taking the belt off of Gunther on a tv match, has the feud with him and Jey even been going on very long?

www.ringsidenews.com

WWE Seemingly Made Last-Minute Change to Jey Uso Match on 2/19 RAW

Jimmy and Jey Uso have been feuding since Jimmy Uso betrayed Jey at SummerSlam last year. Even on RAW this week, Jimmy ended up costing Jey Uso a big
www.ringsidenews.com
Click to expand...
I very much doubt that they planned on ending a 600 day title reign in a random TV match that had like 2 weeks of build lol.

The only reason that would ever happen is Gunther got an injury that he needed to be written off right away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AtlantaWhaler

HeisenBaez

Registered User
Nov 3, 2008
3,498
1,583
Heart of Dixie
sansabri said:
this is so naive. did you boo Hollywood Hogan?
Click to expand...
I neither cheer or booed. Hollywood Hogan was just blah to me. Kevin Nash was always "the leader" of the n.W..o to me.

dahrougem2 said:
He won't commit to that because that character requires full time status.
Click to expand...
Then what's the point? Bloodline already has one guy that only there for half the time, now you add another part timer? This is why I dislike the Bloodline (especially this version of Reigns) storyline very much. I don't need Rock back full time, but part time isn't it either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fro
dahrougem2

dahrougem2

Registered User
Dec 9, 2011
40,138
45,877
Edmonton, Alberta
HeisenBaez said:
I neither cheer or booed. Hollywood Hogan was just blah to me. Kevin Nash was always "the leader" of the n.W..o to me.


Then what's the point? Bloodline already has one guy that only there for half the time, now you add another part timer? This is why I dislike the Bloodline (especially this version of Reigns) storyline very much. I don't need Rock back full time, but part time isn't it either.
Click to expand...
The point isn't what matters to WWE. It is dollar signs. Rock = $$$. Even if part time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: capazzo

FriendlyGhost92

Registered User
Jun 22, 2023
4,548
5,466
dahrougem2 said:
The point isn't what matters to WWE. It is dollar signs. Rock = $$$. Even if part time.
Click to expand...

Not sure people are grasping that less is sometimes more. Roman ain't popping ratings like he does if he's there every single week.

It's actually a pretty smart move that WWE seems to be doing more of these days. A lot of guys are being built as attractions that don't need to be on TV every single week.

You don't see it as much on the RAW side because it's harder to fill 3 hours of TV, but with Smackdown they're having a hard time featuring everybody on TV ever week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: capazzo and Khelandros
dahrougem2

dahrougem2

Registered User
Dec 9, 2011
40,138
45,877
Edmonton, Alberta
FriendlyGhost92 said:
Not sure people are grasping that less is sometimes more. Roman ain't popping ratings like he does if he's there every single week.

It's actually a pretty smart move that WWE seems to be doing more of these days. A lot of guys are being built as attractions that don't need to be on TV every single week.

You don't see it as much on the RAW side because it's harder to fill 3 hours of TV, but with Smackdown they're having a hard time featuring everybody on TV ever week.
Click to expand...
The problem with that, though, is it lessens other wrestlers. Someone full time doesn't have the same aura as Reigns, but not everyone can be part time.

I actually believe WWE should have a wrestler offseason where certain guys are given time off to heal/rest for a couple of months but TV still occurs.
 
BruinDust

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,753
25,335
dahrougem2 said:
The problem with that, though, is it lessens other wrestlers. Someone full time doesn't have the same aura as Reigns, but not everyone can be part time.

I actually believe WWE should have a wrestler offseason where certain guys are given time off to heal/rest for a couple of months but TV still occurs.
Click to expand...

That isn't a problem. Not everyone can be on top. Wrestling always has and always will have a pecking order. Give the promotor a reason to treat you and your character as a special attraction. What a shitty wrestling promotion it would be if all the performers were portrayed as equals.
 
Jussi

Jussi

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
95,510
12,229
Mojo Dojo Casa House


Rhea comes on stage around the 57 minute mark and completely controlled the crowd. Smart booking to have her face Nia in Australia so she can be the face in this feud.

And she and Grayson end the show with a "shoe-in" which is exactly as disgusting as you'd imagine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom
X