Sol
Smile
- Jun 30, 2017
- 23,053
- 22,021
Ya don’t say?still a L for the kings, kings gave up vilardi for PLD and while kuemper is playing like vezina candidate he is 34.
Ya don’t say?still a L for the kings, kings gave up vilardi for PLD and while kuemper is playing like vezina candidate he is 34.
PLD also invited Leonard to stay with him while he gets settled in D.C. So he's added mentor to resume.The Capitals aren't looking to tank anytime soon. Given the players they have locked in long term and the quality of their prospect pool. They're looking to be competitive for years and years and years even after Ovechkin heads back home to Dynamo Moscow. We have seen nothing but great from PLD this year. Washington under Carbery has become a great place for hockey careers to thrive.
So Vilardi + 2nd for Kuemper is good
Not sure if serious
I don't do any of those deals, just because one of them is slightly less disastrous.Not sure if serious
i'd do Vilardi + 2nd for Kuemper over Vilardi + 2nd for PLD any time any day
You can't be serious!
Exactly who I would want mentoring, someone who's quit on three teams already.PLD also invited Leonard to stay with him while he gets settled in D.C. So he's added mentor to resume.
I don't do any of those deals, just because one of them is slightly less disastrous.
Bro! You airballed the perfect chance to call him ShirleyNot sure if serious
i'd do Vilardi + 2nd for Kuemper over Vilardi + 2nd for PLD any time any day
You can't be serious!
I dont know all the things PLD did in CLB, Winn and LA but I remember a Kings team that was pretty badass 10-15 years ago that won it all by collecting an assortment of previously thought defective players. He could regress to his past anytime but maybe he also knows this is his last real shot in the NHL
This is probably the most even 1 for 1 trade in the past decade. Both teams got what they needed.
As long as I tell myself it was PLD for Kuemper straight up and memory hole anything that happened leading up to it, it keeps my blood pressure down and I can agree
I would assume they primarily meant Carter and Richards. IIRC, those two were big party animals and it was part of the reason they were run out of townLike who?
Kopitar, Brown, Doughty and Quick were all drafted by them.
Richards, Justin Williams and Carter were not defective by any means.
They weren't defective by any means, but outside of that core 4, most of the rest of the lineup were castoffs. Richards and Carter in particular were traded away specifically because the shit for brains behind their old team thought they were defective. Penner, Mitchell, Stoll, Regehr, Williams, Gaborik all played for multiple teams.Like who?
Kopitar, Brown, Doughty and Quick were all drafted by them.
Richards, Justin Williams and Carter were not defective by any means.
I would assume they primarily meant Carter and Richards. IIRC, those two were big party animals and it was part of the reason they were run out of town
They were both very much "guys you couldn't win with" that had "character problems"Nobody on earth thought they were defective players tho. Maybe they weren't model citizens off the ice (I mean they were in their mid 20s at the time, I dont see a problem with them partying it up as long as it doesn't affect their on ice performance)
This is probably the most even 1 for 1 trade in the past decade. Both teams got what they needed.
They weren't defective by any means, but outside of that core 4, most of the rest of the lineup were castoffs. Richards and Carter in particular were traded away specifically because the shit for brains behind their old team thought they were defective. Penner, Mitchell, Stoll, Regehr, Williams, Gaborik all played for multiple teams.
They were both very much "guys you couldn't win with" that had "character problems"
The thing is, Richards and Carter never get traded if Philly doesn't go full 'you know what.'Sure but they were your typical veteran additions to a playoff team. I wouldn't call any of them castoffs.
Playing for multiple teams isn't a negative nor should doing so result in a. player being labeled a castoff.
In 2011 right before they were traded Carter had 2 points in 6 playoff games and Richards had 7 in 11 as they got swept in the second round. They were widely rumored to have refused to sign a "dry agreement" during the playoffs and even rumors about sleeping with teammates' wives.Guys you couldn't win with? The dudes who lead their team to the finals a year before their moronic GM jettisoned them? I dont recall people saying things like that about them.
Character problems was the Philly media doing their job of tearing down former players. Sure they partied a lot, but they still showed up to every game and performed great. What a shocker story, players in their mid 20s party a lot.
They weren't defective by any means, but outside of that core 4, most of the rest of the lineup were castoffs. Richards and Carter in particular were traded away specifically because the shit for brains behind their old team thought they were defective. Penner, Mitchell, Stoll, Regehr, Williams, Gaborik all played for multiple teams.
yea you dont.... phillys coach and management did.Nobody on earth thought they were defective players tho. Maybe they weren't model citizens off the ice (I mean they were in their mid 20s at the time, I dont see a problem with them partying it up as long as it doesn't affect their on ice performance)