le_sean
Registered User
- Oct 21, 2006
- 42,013
- 45,166
Slaf isn’t soft whatsoever. Weird comparison.Slaf is going to be an Anthony Mantha 2.0, big, fast and soft. Good but not great... Wright at worst a Ryan O'reilly... Pretty obvious choice.
Slaf isn’t soft whatsoever. Weird comparison.Slaf is going to be an Anthony Mantha 2.0, big, fast and soft. Good but not great... Wright at worst a Ryan O'reilly... Pretty obvious choice.
Finally, a post where you don’t make a low hanging fruit pun involving Wright.Have you seen Nemac play?
Gotta trust Hugo right now............but I do feel there is a big splash coming at the draft....
How about Martin Lapointe, who as a player, used Montreal to get a better deal elsewhere. The guy who is co-heading the draft also didn’t want to come to Montreal.Vinny was scared to come to Montreal though................
It shouldn’t but when your sampling consists of scouts from a representative sample of the market, it may be an indicator of how the Habs may be grappling with the decision internally, at their FU Meetings.Unless one of those scouts is employed by the Montreal Canadiens...Bob MacKenzie's list is just anectodal.
Doesn't mean anything or have any influence on who the Habs will pick.
I love you Sam but please, no more low hanging Wright puns. That train has already crashed several times over.let's hope you are wright
How about Martin Lapointe, who as a player, used Montreal to get a better deal elsewhere. The guy who is co-heading the draft also didn’t want to come to Montreal.
But, you can’t hold that against them when they become suits.
You mean, the guy who used to scout for us when he was on his last legs?Lecavalier was going to come here until we hired Therrien. Can't blame the man for that.
This might be the one draft where having more darts to throw may actually bear results. There are too many ranking unknowns that are attributable to lost development time and lack of scouting data as a fallout from the pandemic, so there may just be more hidden gems from later picks than in more normal drafts.Our scouts' track record – pre-Caufield – scares the crap outta me. Luckily, it's harder (though not impossible) to screw up when you pick 1OA. All experts seem to agree there's not much separating Wright and Slaf, so I won't blame our scouts if the other guy turns out better than ours. As long as we add a core player.
The real scouting happens with our next two picks. Caufield was a somewhat hidden gem; we need to duplicate that radar, nail this draft, and find core pieces outside the top-10, like other teams manage to do.
Pretty embarrassing to have Slafkovsky at #1 , everyone else in the world has Wright #1 , don’t act like this would be happening if Toronto was picking #1 , TSN would be praising Wright and he would be #1 on Bob’s list.Are you new to hockey ? Bob's been making these lists this way for decades. It's a consensus list from scouts he talks to, usually head scouts or directors of player personnel like Timmins was. It's not about agreeing or not, it's about making a list that's representative of what might happen at the draft. Like Bob mentioning rumors of trades he's heard from his sources. He doesn't have to agree with it, he relays the information. That's been his job for decades This is pretty simple stuff.
Pretty embarrassing to have Slafkovsky at #1 , everyone else in the world has Wright #1 , don’t act like this would be happening if Toronto was picking #1 , TSN would be praising Wright and he would be #1 on Bob’s list.
We can agree to disagree, I see the bias going on, it started with Bettman’s enthusiasm when we won the lottery.
He was also mentoring two 16 yo’s on his wings the first half of the year.
That’s just it. I don’t think this is the draft that will define HuGo’s tenure. They should get the benefit of the doubt regardless of outcome. Too many individuals from the scouting community are more and more divided. Margarita’s scouts have no anti-Hab agenda — and if they can’t nab the first to be drafted then Hughes should be afforded leeway.As you mentioned, this draft doesn't seems to feature top elite talent......
Who's the BPA? There's not one. All of them have questions marks.
When there's not a clean BPA, like this year, that's where position becomes more relevant.....Hughes mentioned the exact same thing himself. If you go around the room and 15 out of 20 of your people tell you this is the guy you go with, then screw the position they're playing, but if you end up 10-10....then and only then it becomes a factor.
And being right....it was a way to say that it's easy for us to make our decision but it's a lot of harder for them as they will have to live with their mistake and the criticism that comes with them, not us.
He also said he doesn’t want a guy with a full beard already at 17Gorton himself has been on record in a 2019 interview saying if a team gets the 1st overall, it's the General Manager who makes the call, not the head scout.
He also said he doesn’t want a guy with a full beard already at 17
Pretty embarrassing to have Slafkovsky at #1 , everyone else in the world has Wright #1 , don’t act like this would be happening if Toronto was picking #1 , TSN would be praising Wright and he would be #1 on Bob’s list.
We can agree to disagree, I see the bias going on, it started with Bettman’s enthusiasm when we won the lottery.
Neither is Mantha, but both aren't power forwardsSlaf isn’t soft whatsoever. Weird comparison.
Pretty embarrassing to have Slafkovsky at #1 , everyone else in the world has Wright #1 , don’t act like this would be happening if Toronto was picking #1 , TSN would be praising Wright and he would be #1 on Bob’s list.
We can agree to disagree, I see the bias going on, it started with Bettman’s enthusiasm when we won the lottery.
TMI.Oh ok, so Bob's lying or fabricating stuff. Thank god I was taking a shit while reading this, at least something productive was going on.
Yeah I know lol That goes against Wright. Plus Gorton has shown a tendency to pick wingers.
Oh ok, so Bob's lying or fabricating stuff. Thank god I was taking a shit while reading this, at least something productive was going on.
I wouldn't call it a tendency at all. They were just the unanimous choices that 98% of scouts/teams would have made at those picks.
Slafkovsky is clearly a power forward. His best work is along the boards and bulldozing through the middle of the ice. You don’t need to take yourself out of position to hit someone, or to punch someone in the mouth, to be considered a power forward.Neither is Mantha, but both aren't power forwards
That’s just it. I don’t think this is the draft that will define HuGo’s tenure. They should get the benefit of the doubt regardless of outcome. Too many individuals from the scouting community are more and more divided. Margarita’s scouts have no anti-Hab agenda — and if they can’t nab the first to be drafted then Hughes should be afforded leeway.
I’d hate to see position as the deciding factor. I would much rather they take the player who has the best chance of becoming a first line player even if both current targets have been anointed as having 2nd line ceilings.
Well not in international competition with a very different idea of physical play than the NHL. It's very possible that Slafkofsky thrives in the NHL but it is certainly far from proven so far. Who knows, maybe he can fight, too.Slaf isn’t soft whatsoever. Weird comparison.
Slafkovsky is clearly a power forward. His best work is along the boards and bulldozing through the middle of the ice. You don’t need to take yourself out of position to hit someone, or to punch someone in the mouth, to be considered a power forward.