Wright, Slafkovsky, Cooley : Time to make that final decision

Who is your 1st overall pick?


  • Total voters
    883
Status
Not open for further replies.

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,305
156,308
Have you seen Nemac play?
Gotta trust Hugo right now............but I do feel there is a big splash coming at the draft....
Finally, a post where you don’t make a low hanging fruit pun involving Wright. ;)

Agreed with you on giving Hughes a chance. From what’s being reported, he’s being thorough and that can only bode well.
 

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,305
156,308
Vinny was scared to come to Montreal though................
How about Martin Lapointe, who as a player, used Montreal to get a better deal elsewhere. The guy who is co-heading the draft also didn’t want to come to Montreal.

But, you can’t hold that against them when they become suits.
 

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,305
156,308
Unless one of those scouts is employed by the Montreal Canadiens...Bob MacKenzie's list is just anectodal.

Doesn't mean anything or have any influence on who the Habs will pick.
It shouldn’t but when your sampling consists of scouts from a representative sample of the market, it may be an indicator of how the Habs may be grappling with the decision internally, at their FU Meetings.

let's hope you are wright
I love you Sam but please, no more low hanging Wright puns. That train has already crashed several times over. ;)
 

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,305
156,308
Our scouts' track record – pre-Caufield – scares the crap outta me. Luckily, it's harder (though not impossible) to screw up when you pick 1OA. All experts seem to agree there's not much separating Wright and Slaf, so I won't blame our scouts if the other guy turns out better than ours. As long as we add a core player.

The real scouting happens with our next two picks. Caufield was a somewhat hidden gem; we need to duplicate that radar, nail this draft, and find core pieces outside the top-10, like other teams manage to do.
This might be the one draft where having more darts to throw may actually bear results. There are too many ranking unknowns that are attributable to lost development time and lack of scouting data as a fallout from the pandemic, so there may just be more hidden gems from later picks than in more normal drafts.
 

Tetragrammaton

Registered User
Mar 17, 2022
2,305
2,923
Are you new to hockey ? Bob's been making these lists this way for decades. It's a consensus list from scouts he talks to, usually head scouts or directors of player personnel like Timmins was. It's not about agreeing or not, it's about making a list that's representative of what might happen at the draft. Like Bob mentioning rumors of trades he's heard from his sources. He doesn't have to agree with it, he relays the information. That's been his job for decades This is pretty simple stuff.
Pretty embarrassing to have Slafkovsky at #1 , everyone else in the world has Wright #1 , don’t act like this would be happening if Toronto was picking #1 , TSN would be praising Wright and he would be #1 on Bob’s list.

We can agree to disagree, I see the bias going on, it started with Bettman’s enthusiasm when we won the lottery.
 

BigDaddyLurch

Have some PRIDE, Eric...
Mar 1, 2013
21,800
18,274
Principle's Office
Pretty embarrassing to have Slafkovsky at #1 , everyone else in the world has Wright #1 , don’t act like this would be happening if Toronto was picking #1 , TSN would be praising Wright and he would be #1 on Bob’s list.

We can agree to disagree, I see the bias going on, it started with Bettman’s enthusiasm when we won the lottery.


:biglaugh:
 

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,305
156,308
As you mentioned, this draft doesn't seems to feature top elite talent......
Who's the BPA? There's not one. All of them have questions marks.

When there's not a clean BPA, like this year, that's where position becomes more relevant.....Hughes mentioned the exact same thing himself. If you go around the room and 15 out of 20 of your people tell you this is the guy you go with, then screw the position they're playing, but if you end up 10-10....then and only then it becomes a factor.

And being right....it was a way to say that it's easy for us to make our decision but it's a lot of harder for them as they will have to live with their mistake and the criticism that comes with them, not us.
That’s just it. I don’t think this is the draft that will define HuGo’s tenure. They should get the benefit of the doubt regardless of outcome. Too many individuals from the scouting community are more and more divided. Margarita’s scouts have no anti-Hab agenda — and if they can’t nab the first to be drafted then Hughes should be afforded leeway.

I’d hate to see position as the deciding factor. I would much rather they take the player who has the best chance of becoming a first line player even if both current targets have been anointed as having 2nd line ceilings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigDaddyLurch

BenchBrawl

Registered User
Jul 26, 2010
31,062
13,993
We got doubly unlucky to get the 1st overall this year, AND that the draft is in Montreal.

If we could play optimally, we'd trade down a few spots and use the added assets to secure Nemec and Lekkerimaki.

Then tank next year and pick a center.

Where is our #1D gonna come from for this upcoming core? This year seems like an excellent opportunity to grab one.

Plus, defensemen take longer to develop in general. May as well pick him up in the first draft so everyone can peak around the same time.

Not worried about the #2D-#5D spots with our prospect pool. But we have no #1D and they don't grow on trees.
 
Last edited:

OnTheRun

/dev/null
May 17, 2014
12,797
11,575
Pretty embarrassing to have Slafkovsky at #1 , everyone else in the world has Wright #1 , don’t act like this would be happening if Toronto was picking #1 , TSN would be praising Wright and he would be #1 on Bob’s list.

We can agree to disagree, I see the bias going on, it started with Bettman’s enthusiasm when we won the lottery.

You're not making any sense here.

Button have Wright at #1 (and the Habs are picking Wright in is mock draft), he work for TSN too you know and he's much more a Leafs cheerleader than Bob ever was.

Button's list = 100% Button's OPINION
Bob's list = 100% NOT Bob's opinion
 

Andrei79

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
16,462
30,589
Pretty embarrassing to have Slafkovsky at #1 , everyone else in the world has Wright #1 , don’t act like this would be happening if Toronto was picking #1 , TSN would be praising Wright and he would be #1 on Bob’s list.

We can agree to disagree, I see the bias going on, it started with Bettman’s enthusiasm when we won the lottery.

Oh ok, so Bob's lying or fabricating stuff. Thank god I was taking a shit while reading this, at least something productive was going on.
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,013
45,166
Neither is Mantha, but both aren't power forwards
Slafkovsky is clearly a power forward. His best work is along the boards and bulldozing through the middle of the ice. You don’t need to take yourself out of position to hit someone, or to punch someone in the mouth, to be considered a power forward.
 

Milhouse40

Registered User
Aug 19, 2010
22,562
25,681
That’s just it. I don’t think this is the draft that will define HuGo’s tenure. They should get the benefit of the doubt regardless of outcome. Too many individuals from the scouting community are more and more divided. Margarita’s scouts have no anti-Hab agenda — and if they can’t nab the first to be drafted then Hughes should be afforded leeway.

I’d hate to see position as the deciding factor. I would much rather they take the player who has the best chance of becoming a first line player even if both current targets have been anointed as having 2nd line ceilings.

Debatable but Wright is still views as the BPA. It has been Shane Wright draft for the last 3 years.....not one prospect showed me enough to take that place....and he happened to be exactly what we need, why complicate thing?

Whoever they pick, I'll support....but if they pick Wright, it's not going to be only because he's center either, he's going 1 or 2 regardless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77

dcyhabs

Registered User
May 30, 2008
4,456
2,678
Montreal
Slaf isn’t soft whatsoever. Weird comparison.
Well not in international competition with a very different idea of physical play than the NHL. It's very possible that Slafkofsky thrives in the NHL but it is certainly far from proven so far. Who knows, maybe he can fight, too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad