ChesterNimitz
governed by the principle of calculated risk
- Jul 4, 2002
- 5,837
- 12,683
Either one presents the best ‘blend’ between the two extremes.Or draft for the highest mean between the floor and ceiling (Nemec / Cooley).
Either one presents the best ‘blend’ between the two extremes.Or draft for the highest mean between the floor and ceiling (Nemec / Cooley).
It's still Wright and by a large margin since he has both the highest floor and highest ceiling.Or draft for the highest mean between the floor and ceiling (Nemec / Cooley).
Slaf could play on a line with Caufield and provide size, protection and physicality on his line.
Anderson will not always be there and we should probably trade him sooner rather than later for futures as his value is high.
It's still Wright and by a large margin since he has both the highest floor and highest ceiling.
He would provide size but he won't provide protection or physicality. Slafkovsky is not a mean or physical player. I don't think I've ever seen him lay a big hit and certainly never purposefully tried to make someone feel pain
Yes just like Latendresse didHe could develop that
He could develop that
of course it is his opinion just like you have yours and I have mine. About 90% of people who voted agree with him. He is in the overwhelming majority so it is more likely that your opinion is wrong.That's your opinion. If you can't accept the simple fact that your opinion might be wrong we don't have much to discuss anyway.
He would provide size but he won't provide protection or physicality. Slafkovsky is not a mean or physical player. I don't think I've ever seen him lay a big hit and certainly never purposefully tried to make someone feel pain
of course it is his opinion just like you have yours and I have mine. About 90% of people who voted agree with him. He is in the overwhelming majority so it is more likely that your opinion is wrong.
Surprise Slaf has so few votes. Thought he'd be a bit more popular based on discussions in other threads. In any case, it's Wright for me. Only player with franchise-level potential, IMO.
vocal...yes...obsessed...very much so!That's what we call a very vocal minority.
By project I meant that his stats looks subpar while some other prospects had better offensive production than him. Not saying he's a bad prospect by any means but that a guy like him wouldn't be able to come in right away in our lineup unlike Wright who's probably be slotted on the 3rd line right away.Not saying I'd take him ahead of Wright (or even Cooley) but Slafkovsky is not a project like KK was. Not even close.
It depends on which player the Habs prefer. If they prefer Cooley over Wright it might make sense to trade down but if the Habs prefer Wright it probably doesn’t.Why? Getting a late 1st round pick is not worth swapping #1OA for #3OA. Quality over quantity.
I always smirk when i read about Shane Wright defensive game or high floor.
In my opinion, those are bonuses. His offensive ceiling is what entice me. He has absolute offensive tools. He is an elite connector to his teammates and he is very efficient in a give and go style. An absolute transition beast. Powerful skater and terrific shot.
I think he could end up being Team Canada 3C behind McDavid and MacKinnon.
The kid models his game after Bergeron...............think about that for a minute.I always smirk when i read about Shane Wright defensive game or high floor.
In my opinion, those are bonuses. His offensive ceiling is what entice me. He has absolute offensive tools. He is an elite connector to his teammates and he is very efficient in a give and go style. An absolute transition beast. Powerful skater and terrific shot.
I think he could end up being Team Canada 3C behind McDavid and MacKinnon.
That's why I literally said: IF SOMEHOW.Of course it will take incentives in order to pull it out. So no I don't think I'm smarter then an NHL gm cause God knows how smart these guys are...But since it's a discussion board, I thought it would be nice to share what I would like to happen if possible.of course and sorry for insulting all those smart GMs out there.People on here think they're smarter than GMs and then propose the dumbest shit I've ever read.
Why would Arizona trade the 3rd + for our 1st? They'll tell us to f*** off and take whatever center we want and take the remaining one.
We all have opinions... I stated mine and your the one who doesn't agree and there for can't accept that someone might have a different opinion than yours...That's your opinion. If you can't accept the simple fact that your opinion might be wrong we don't have much to discuss anyway.