Value of: Would anyone take Barclay Goodrow?

[McJedi]

You can get Goodrow for free, or you can get Goodrow with retention for an actual asset. You can't get Goodrow with retention for free.

I don’t believe there is a team in the NHL that would acquire Goodrow for future considerations. His value at the full AAV is negative.

 

[McRanger92]

Rangers wont retain on Goodrow but they will give him away for free in the offseason. His buyout comes with a cap credit the next 2 seasons. Chytil and Miller contracts will force Drury's hand a bit

 

[GAGLine]

I don’t believe there is a team in the NHL that would acquire Goodrow for future considerations. His value at the full AAV is negative.

With cap space being so tight, the Rangers might have to add a sweetener to move him, but he absolutely has value.

 

[Oddbob]

If you are trying to win in the playoffs, why are you getting rid of a guy that is the kind of guy you want on a playoff team?

 

[actuallynotPJStock]

He’s great depth Rangers have a major cap crunch and him and Lindgren are the only moveable pieces. Lindgren is a top pair d man so Goodrow would be the preference to move first.

Not to derail the thread, but if Lindgren is even remotely available i'm sure the Oilers would be interested.

 

[Stewie Griffin]

If you are trying to win in the playoffs, why are you getting rid of a guy that is the kind of guy you want on a playoff team?

Because he is a 29 year old bottom 6 forward making 3.6M for the next 4.5 years

 

[McJedi]

With cap space being so tight, the Rangers might have to add a sweetener to move him, but he absolutely has value.

My definition of value demands no retention or sweeteners. If the Rangers have to sweeten the pot or take back a bad contract and he can’t be traded at his full AAV for even a conditional 7th round pick, he’s got no positive trade value. He’s negative trade value.

I think he’s negative trade value.

 

[GAGLine]

My definition of value demands no retention or sweeteners. If the Rangers have to sweeten the pot or take back a bad contract and he can’t be traded at his full AAV for even a conditional 7th round pick, he’s got no positive trade value. He’s negative trade value.

I think he’s negative trade value.

My point was that the sweetener might only be needed because cap space is so tight. In a normal year, he absolutely has value. Last year Bjorkstrand only returned a 3rd and a 4th. Do you think that's his actual value?

 

[Oddbob]

Because he is a 29 year old bottom 6 forward making 3.6M for the next 4.5 years

Seeing as they just gave him that, I highly doubt they are wanting to move him.

 

[Djp]

St. Louis could have taken him

 

[HuGort]

What do you think Miller will get?

Miller turning good defense man. Hard to tell but be steep

 

[HuGort]

Rangers wont retain on Goodrow but they will give him away for free in the offseason. His buyout comes with a cap credit the next 2 seasons. Chytil and Miller contracts will force Drury's hand a bit

Habs going to offer sheet Lafreniere. Give up a 2nd

 

[GAGLine]

Miller turning good defense man. Hard to tell but be steep

It won't be so steep that the Rangers can't re-sign him. Dobson is the closest comparable. He got 3 years @ 4 mil last summer. Miller might get a higher AAV, but not by much if it's a 2 or 3 year deal.

 

[pullyoursocksup]

He's a negative value player. Either the rangers would have to retain, or give up assets to rid themselves of his contract.

 

[HuGort]

It won't be so steep that the Rangers can't re-sign him. Dobson is the closest comparable. He got 3 years @ 4 mil last summer. Miller might get a higher AAV, but not by much if it's a 2 or 3 year deal.

Get Miller for 4 million is a deal. Can't see it.

 

[McRanger92]

Habs going to offer sheet Lafreniere. Give up a 2nd

Time to wake up Peter Pan

 

[HuGort]

Time to wake up Peter Pan

You'll see this summer. We will ll steal him.

 

[GAGLine]

You'll see this summer. We will ll steal him.

Probably right after you draft Bedard, and then we'll offer sheet him in 3 years.

 

[McJedi]

My point was that the sweetener might only be needed because cap space is so tight. In a normal year, he absolutely has value. Last year Bjorkstrand only returned a 3rd and a 4th. Do you think that's his actual value?

Sure. Because the value is the value when he’s traded. NHL isn’t in a normal place yet. Won’t be next year either. Cap likely goes up just another $1mm for 2023-2024.

 

[LaffyTaffy13]

Age 29
4 years remaining at $3.6M AAV
49 GP, 9G, 14A, 23P this season
Good third liner, penalty killing, leadership, locker room guy, Cup experience, intangibles etc etc.

Rangers desperately need the cap space in the offseason and getting rid of him might be the only way.

The simple answer is yes. He has a fair contract for what he brings to the table. Hes a guy who has some offensive ability, PK’s, fights. Hes an ideal piece on a young team needing a vet leader.

 

[HuGort]

Probably right after you draft Bedard, and then we'll offer sheet him in 3 years.

We ain't that lucky to get Bedard.

Rangers in cap hell this summer. Chance Habs get a deal on Lafreniere

 

[mouser]

The simple answer is yes. He has a fair contract for what he brings to the table. Hes a guy who has some offensive ability, PK’s, fights. Hes an ideal piece on a young team needing a vet leader.

Agreed. Perfect fit on a team with a lot of young players like the Rangers.

 

[ColbyChaos]

Negative value

 

[Black Tank]

I've seen a lot of f***ing clueless bullshit on the Trade board but this is one of my favorites. Why would the Rangers get rid of a guy who they got for the POs and who delivered last year in that role just when they're about to contend for the remaining years of his contract? I know this is hockeyfuture but this is also f***ing reality.

 

[dirtydanglez]

yea i think someone would in the offseason. i wouldn't expect much in return however.