NyQuil
Big F$&*in Q
I'd rather a bronze than silver. At least you win that. No one has ever won a silver.
I understand that psychology behind that, but at the same, I'd always rather be in the position to win the Gold.
I'd rather a bronze than silver. At least you win that. No one has ever won a silver.
The results are true, but Canada outplayed USA in regulation this game.Including their match in the preliminary round, USA outshot Canada by a combined 87-54 and outshot them in all 7 periods.
Interestingly enough, Canada hasn't outshot the US in an Olympic / WC game since the Sochi final in 2014.
42-31 W
45-23 L
40-30 W
30-18 W
34-32 W
39-23 W
36-27 W
34-11 W
That's a combined 300 total shots for the US and only 195 for Canada over 8 games. I think that's a good indication of the growing gap between these two programs.
The results are true, but Canada outplayed USA in regulation this game.
The results are true, but Canada outplayed USA in regulation this game.
Gold Medal World Cup games have ended in penalty kicks before.
Outshot doesn't = outplayed. Canada had sustained pressure consistently in the first two periods. Not to mention, the USA had way more PPs than Canada which boosted those stats. At 5 on 5, it wasn't close until OT.They were outshot 33-24 in regulation by the Americans, outshot in every period.
Until halfway into the 3rd period, Canada had much more pressure on the USA at 5 on 5. I mean if Canada had USA's # of PPs they'd win the shot totals.I wouldn't say that at all.
They stopped being aggressive once they went up 2-1 and gave up all the momentum in the game.
It's very common (you see it in the NHL all the time) but it was still disappointing.
Outshot doesn't = outplayed. Canada had sustained pressure consistently in the first two periods. Not to mention, the USA had way more PPs than Canada which boosted those stats. At 5 on 5, it wasn't close until OT.
Until halfway into the 3rd period, Canada had much more pressure on the USA at 5 on 5. I mean if Canada had USA's # of PPs they'd win the shot totals.
Shootout is about skill and nerves. Skill and nerves are both a big part of the game. A win in a shootout is no less valuable than in OT.
B.S. It's as "hockey" as it gets, and a very "hockey" play. If you don't like SKILL AND NERVES, watch pond hockey or something.Not a big fan of women's hockey so who won or who lost is not a big deal for me. But shoot outs in hockey period have to go. It isn't hockey! The most important goal, in the most important game, in the most important tournament is decided by a non hockey play. It makes no sense to me at all. It's wonderful that "Shootout is about skill and nerves" but playing hockey is by far the biggest part of the game hockey.
B.S. It's as "hockey" as it gets, and a very "hockey" play. If you don't like SKILL AND NERVES, watch pond hockey or something.
It does, because the weight of expectations is much bigger in SO than in a simple breakaway in regulation. Do I need to explain why?I find shootouts entertaining to some degree but the fact that it's one skater and one goalie with no urgency (no one else on the ice) doesn't make it as "hockey" as it gets IMO.
It does, because the weight of expectations is much bigger in SO than in a simple breakaway in regulation. Do I need to explain why?
I personally don't see the issue with her taking off the medal. It might have the initial perception of looking like sour grapes, but when your objective is to play for first, you shouldn't be happy to settle for second. She's a competitor and she was obviously in a very sour mood. I won't personally crucify her for objecting to the fact she and her teammates did not finish what they set out to do. It's not like she threw it on the ice or into the stands.
while in reality it's most likely disappointment it comes off as disrespect or ungratefulness. there are 35 women on the Korean team that would do just about anything for that silver medal and I'm quite sure she'll be glad to cash the check she gets for that silver medal.
it takes time to appreciate an Olympic silver medal. in the future I'm sure she'll regret removing it like that for the entire world to see.
Regardless, Canada outplayed USA at 5x5.Well penalties are part of the game, either the US played well enough to force Canada to take penalties, or Canada had too much undisciplined play.
Considering the US has outshot Canada in 8 consecutive games at the WC and Olympics, and just outshot them 45-23 in the preliminary round, I'm not sure if I buy that. The USA only had 3 more PP's but 11 more shots... I doubt either team was averaging 4 shots per PP....
Shootout is about skill and nerves. Skill and nerves are both a big part of the game. A win in a shootout is no less valuable than in OT.
Regardless, Canada outplayed USA at 5x5.
Was it just me....
Or did the first usa shooter take two shot attempts?
Should hsve beem waved off
As a Canadian, have no problem with the referees, Canadian coach another story. Have to agree with the posters that said she shortened her bench far too early. She only used 5 defensemen from the middle of the 2nd on with a brief exception for a few seconds on the PP near the end of OT. They only had 6 defense and if you can't trust one of them for over half a game, why is she on the team? It was obvious that the D had no legs left in the OT. As far as forwards go, she used barely 7 in the OT. I kept waiting to see Turnbull who has excellent skill get a shift but to no avail. The coach simply did not trust her team and as a result lost.
That being said congrats to the U.S. with their well earned victory.
I think she will appreciate it but 99.99% of the world's population will forget that she took it off briefly.
She's absolutely devastated. She didn't mouth off at anyone, complain to the refs, or hurl it into the stands.
What is coming off these days is a complete lack of sympathy and general forgiveness replaced with the need to judge everyone for everything from the cheap seats on a continuous basis.
Is Lamoureux able to fake and beat a NHL goalie with that shootout goal?