GDT: [WJC] United States vs. Germany, 10PM EST 9/8/22

Just turned it on quickly...

I think that call is fair. He hit the goalie in the head with the stick - assuming that was an American player's stick.

It was and it was. Now... WHY isn't that part of their initial review? That blows my mind, that they didn't look at it and think "hey, there is the US player clipping Quapp in the melon so that's not a goal" from the get go while looking at the high-stick portion too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ginger Papa
200.webp
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ginger Papa
Just turned it on quickly...

I think that call is fair. He hit the goalie in the head with the stick - assuming that was an American player's stick.

I thought he played the puck first unless there was something else that resulted in a stick on head that i missed.
 
"The call on the ice stands"?

You didn't call goalie interference on the ice :laugh:

It was called no goal on the ice and they reviewed it called it goal and then germany challenged it and refs reviewed again and kept the original call on the ice of no goal.
 
It was called no goal on the ice and they reviewed it called it goal and then germany challenged it and refs reviewed again and kept the original call on the ice of no goal.

I know exactly what happened. It was called no goal on the ice because of a high stick. It ended up being no goal because of goalie interference. That's a different call ending with the same result, not a call standing. Just saying it was a confusing way for the ref to word it. Just say the previous call has been reversed, no goal because of goalie interference. "The call stands" makes it sounds like that review didn't change anything which it did, it changed it from good goal(on the first review) to no goal because goalie interference.
 
I was just thinking, you enjoying those $50 seats Mr. and Mrs. Edmonton hockey fan? All 14 of them.

The packages they tried to sell were for less games than they were originally sold and were going to cost my in laws $2400 for them to go. This didn’t include the Gold medal game either.

They didn’t re-purchase them obviously.

Utterly not worth it. Tickets for round robin games in the summer when everyone is on vacations should be like $15 and kids under 7 get in free to drive more traffic.

This is embarrassing and pure greed from Hockey Canada, it’s not even about filling the most seats and making the atmosphere the best they possibly could. Short sighted and people should lose jobs over this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ginger Papa
I know exactly what happened. It was called no goal on the ice because of a high stick. It ended up being no goal because of goalie interference. That's a different call ending with the same result, not a call standing. Just saying it was a confusing way for the ref to word it. Just say the previous call has been reversed, no goal because of goalie interference. "The call stands" makes it sounds like that review didn't change anything which it did, it changed it from good goal(on the first review) to no goal because goalie interference.

The ref didn't explain why Germany was challenging it.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad