Jacobv2 said:To me, it's MORE justifiable. We can't predict injuries, but we can predict who will and won't be cut (at least those of us that do our homework).
Why?markov` said:Look, we can't do anything with the injuries, but we can do something with the players who has been cut. Be fair.
No, but they may have an advantage of being able to pick players now that the rosters (and lines) are pretty much set in stone.markov` said:It would not be fun for those whose players are cut. Understand it. They will not steal any of your picks anyway.
BuppY said:how about we have a vote on this re-draft thing. Lets see how many are in favour of it and how many arn't.
Who cares? If it's such a minor detail then why don't we just skip the supplemental draft.Rabid Ranger said:Or we could let markov decide since he's the one that organized this draft? I admit I'm biased since I had a player cut, but I don't get the whining about getting to select a replacement at the end of the draft. Who cares?
? It kinda levels the playing field and people who were unfortunate enough to have players cut or hurt have a shot at winining the pool.
kris said:From an outsider's view:
The re-draft would be a good thing, it makes it more competitive, which, in-turn, would make it more fun for everyone involved. I see no problem with it, it really won't make or break the pool, so why not? It kinda levels the playing field and people who were unfortunate enough to have players cut or hurt have a shot at winining the pool. If you have an injured/cut guy, they would be in tough to win the pool.
Make things a little bit closer, good idea IMO.
Jacobv2 said:Who cares? If it's such a minor detail then why don't we just skip the supplemental draft.
One of the points I've been harping on is that it appears as though markov is going to allow cut players to be replaced, but not injured players.
It levels the playing field, but if someone wins with one or two new additions that victory is, IMO, tainted.
Jacobv2 said:It levels the playing field, but if someone wins with one or two new additions that victory is, IMO, tainted.
RaTcine said:We're not playing for any money... would just be more close and fun
littleHossa said:my outsider opinion:
It's part of this pool experience. Everyone who plays these things know what to expect. Last season a lot of people picked Heatley, and he went down before the season began. People picked Hasek, they picked Kovalchuk much lower. People pick Holmes in the top 5 every year and every year he gets injured. If you are in these pools you take luck and injuries as part of your planning and you know it takes these to win them. This pool shouldn't be any different, it's not like you'll catch a break anywhere else, this has all the elements of the other pools you've all participated in and it shouldn't be anything shocking or surprising to see.
It won't be close anyway....CC has, hands down, the best team out of the bunch.RaTcine said:We're not playing for any money... would just be more close and fun