WJC pool drafting thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
OK guys. I finally found it is very unfair for people who selected players who are cut. I'm for doing another draft (pick another player of the same position that the player who has been cut)... if nobody is against, we will make the "after-draft" after the draft.
 
markov` said:
OK guys. I finally found it is very unfair for people who selected players who are cut. I'm for doing another draft (pick another player of the same position that the player who has been cut)... if nobody is against, we will make the "after-draft" after the draft.
Thanks.
 
I am against the draft. I drafted players who were safer picks and I could have gambled and taken players such as Perry or Barker earlier but I didn't want to risk loosing them if they were cut and I think that is unfair, but for the players that got injured I think you should be able to replace them but for the players who been cut, I don't think you should be gable to replace them. :shakehead
 
markov` said:
OK guys. I finally found it is very unfair for people who selected players who are cut. I'm for doing another draft (pick another player of the same position that the player who has been cut)... if nobody is against, we will make the "after-draft" after the draft.

Cool.
 
RaTcine said:
At this moment of the draft, there are no more superstar players so it's not if it was automaticly a great players that we could pick up.

Exactly. We will finish the draft first, so it doesn't affect your picks. It's just to have a little more challenge, because it's sure that a team with 11 players is better than a team with 8 players.
 
BuppY said:
I am against the draft. I drafted players who were safer picks and I could have gambled and taken players such as Perry or Barker earlier but I didn't want to risk loosing them if they were cut and I think that is unfair, but for the players that got injured I think you should be able to replace them but for the players who been cut, I don't think you should be gable to replace them. :shakehead
I agree with this.
 
You call it luck, I call it technique. They should have done their homework.
 
Jacobv2 said:
You call it luck, I call it technique. They should have done their homework.

It is pure luck. We have no power on the coach's decision. Picking was Fehr was safer than picking Perry at one point.

And remember, we are still punishing those teams. Fehr was selected in the 2nd round... RaTcine will have to replace him by a 12th rounder.
 
markov` said:
It is pure luck. We have no power on the coach's decision. Picking was Fehr was safer than picking Perry at one point.

And remember, we are still punishing those teams. Fehr was selected in the 2nd round... RaTcine will have to replace him by a 12th rounder.
I guess you're right. My problem is, what if they replace Fehr with Horton? Unlikely, I know.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad