I share your sentiment.It seemed odder for posters on this board to assume he's a generational McDavid.. Thats underselling McDavid by lightyears. Thats my horse in the race, which I explained.
Nothing odd about looking at what contributions are against good or bad opponents. Bedards play against best possible opponents is what will most translate to the challenges of the NHL.
To wit the Czechs gave Bedard all kinds of problems and they pretty much shut him down. His attempts to go wide weren't even close. He was being crashed into the back boards.
Being that this is hockey futures board whats wrong with looking at games or results that are most translatable, i.e. harder opponents. Because the NHL is hard.
I think he will be good. But I think the brakes need to be pumped a bit. To me he doesn’t possess anything that would make me confidently put him in the generational category. Mcdavid by contrast was a better skater and stickhandler at 17 years old than 99% of the NHL.
I’m a little skeptical with these types of players, and I wonder how much is attributed to him just being better than his peers in his age group. I mean we’ve seen it plenty of times where people dominate juniors and come up to the league and aren’t superstars. I wonder if he’s a man amongst boys out there, and if he can do what he’s doing as a man amongst other men.
But it also wouldn’t surprise me if he was a top 5 player throughout his career. He definitely has crazy potential.