With the Trade Deadline slowly approaching...
- Thread starter CBJx614
- Start date
- Status
alphafox
Registered User
- Jun 14, 2011
- 1,443
- 92
I don't think it is bad at all...right now. We are seeing Tyutin regress in an appreciable way during this season and we know that he is likely only going to get worse with age. The question now is whether we trade him while we can still get assets for him, or we hold onto him as veteran defensive depth.
He's regressing? By that I assume you are meaning his production? We do realize that he's not getting any PP time right? That and our ****** 5 on 5 play is contributing greatly to his "regression".
I don't see much difference in Tyutin this season. His contract is fine.
I don't see much difference in Tyutin this season. His contract is fine.
Like most of our deadlines it will come down to what contending teams want and what they are willing to pay; along with when we think we'll be competitive (is it 2015-16 or is it 2016-17 season).
If for whatever reason management/ownership thinks they are gearing up for 2016-17 then you could see us actively moving guys who are UFA after next season.
More than anything the CBJ needs to be open to anything. Who would have thought back in the day when we were not competitive that we could acquire a guy like Ray Whitney in a deadline deal?
Also if the market (like it sometimes does) is vastly overpaying for checking line forwards and stay at home d-men, I don't mind moving those peices if it gets us a gret return.
Not a lot of valuable assets we need to move, and I think we have a decent core, but is if someone is willing to overpay just about anyone is available.
If for whatever reason management/ownership thinks they are gearing up for 2016-17 then you could see us actively moving guys who are UFA after next season.
More than anything the CBJ needs to be open to anything. Who would have thought back in the day when we were not competitive that we could acquire a guy like Ray Whitney in a deadline deal?
Also if the market (like it sometimes does) is vastly overpaying for checking line forwards and stay at home d-men, I don't mind moving those peices if it gets us a gret return.
Not a lot of valuable assets we need to move, and I think we have a decent core, but is if someone is willing to overpay just about anyone is available.
EspenK
Registered User
- Sep 25, 2011
- 15,842
- 4,446
So lets say we play ourselves out of a top 10 pick (by the deadline, in usual jackets fashion) but dont make the playoffs. Do you think we package our first for help both now and in the future or do we keep it and hope we get lucky in the lottery?
EspenK
Registered User
- Sep 25, 2011
- 15,842
- 4,446
At he deadline there is almost 0 chance we trade our pick imo. At that point teams are looking to add guys who can help the stretch run not draft picks and I don't think we will be looking to add a role player. We need a top 6 RW or a top 4 D. Those guys are about 99% certain to not be available.
At the draft itself it will depend on what is coming back and who is still on the board. My guess is that its probably the draft pick that we wind up with. Lots of talented guys going to be there at 10 or so.
cbjfaninmo
4 those about 2 rock
Unless there is a team who is completely out of the race and is looking to stockpile picks and unload a few players, which is entirely possible.
EspenK
Registered User
- Sep 25, 2011
- 15,842
- 4,446
I don't think bad teams look to unload the kind of players we would want.
Johansen2Foligno
CBJ Realest
- Jan 2, 2015
- 9,266
- 4,178
Well, it's getting to be that time of the year for the annual fleecing.
I propose the following:
LA Kings get:
Anisimov
Atkinson
Columbus Blue Jackets get:
Mike Richards
Conditional Seventh Round Pick
I propose the following:
LA Kings get:
Anisimov
Atkinson
Columbus Blue Jackets get:
Mike Richards
Conditional Seventh Round Pick
Viqsi
"that chick from Ohio"
Biannual. BIannual. There was no Kings trade in 2013.
Also, the rule is that we have to send them a former Flyer.
Biannual. BIannual. There was no Kings trade in 2013.
Also, the rule is that we have to send them a former Flyer.
Because Gaborik played in Philly?
Viqsi
"that chick from Ohio"
Double-Shift Lasse
Just post better
Dont forget, we need to pay some of their salary while taking all of Richards contract
niflheim
Hockey is cheating
- Nov 22, 2014
- 1,143
- 38
Slava Voynov out. We can add Murray
LGGSD /Golden State Dynasty/ 
The global circulation of ex - Flyers in Columbus
Last edited:
Cowumbus
Registered User
EspenK
Registered User
- Sep 25, 2011
- 15,842
- 4,446
I vote for a top 6 W preferably a guy who can play the RW.
But not at he deadline, if it happens it will be at draft or later.
Last edited:
Robert
Foligno family
Per script, the JD/Kek CBJ won't do much on trade day.... except for getting players we've never heard of or injured...
S1N4TR4
CBJ CBJ CBJ
- Nov 15, 2013
- 6,186
- 5,054
Troy Brouwer is a player who I believe would do wonders on the Jackets and fit as a top 6 right winger that we need.... UFA after this season. Cap hit of just above 3 so I'm sure he'll be asking for 5 mill, at the least. 24 points this season with 13 goals. Has great size and plays with an edge at all times.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
eh we have Foligno, Dubi, Hartnell and Jenner who bring the same thing. I know size is great but we need more of a sniper type. Dont think we need to be spending that on a 2/3 line guy especially with what we already have
The point may be moot. Brouwer is under contract until 2016. If we want a guy like him, Justin Williams is the UFA to go after, even if he getting up there in age. To get a sniper, we'll have to make a trade.
- Status
