The Dobbers stuff is an outlier ranking, not worth taking seriously even in the not-to-taken-seriously world of prospect pool rankings. It was a nice touch though to give evaluation points to a decimal value. Gives the impression of some seriously deep calculation going on of so much relevant data that it can't be boiled down to just whole numbers, it needs to be in tenths and even hundredths. Probably took hours of number-crunching and informed debate amongst hockey wizards to produce Buchelnikov's 5.48 as opposed to 5.61 or 5.34.
It's fantasy content, nothing more, based almost entirely on point production, highlights and social media gossip amongst the commentary community, and filtered through one dubious content producer. The Wings have a very good prospect pool, largely filled at the top with quality two-way players who will be better NHLers than many higher scoring prospects getting more attention.