Confirmed with Link: Wings Fire Lalonde and Hire Todd McLellan

JediOrderPizza

Registered User
Apr 15, 2012
7,129
9,497
Tampa, Fl
Temple of Doom references, I approve.

4HGC.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: SantosHalper

Euro Twins

Healthy Scratch
Mar 19, 2016
994
921
Now that I've had a couple days to digest this, I'm really liking the choice of coach. McLellan has a proven track record of making regular season juggernauts. If he can at least get us over 500 and back into a wild card and help the team improve to .600+ team again, that would be amazing and I doubt we'd have too many upset about that.

His biggest downfall as a head coach has been playoff success. But with a gm like Steve Yzerman, this may very well be the best opportunity he has to finally break that barrier in time.

He's come full circle back as coach where it all started and where he got his name etched on the cup.

I'm 100% bought in
 

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
16,876
11,448
I'm still waiting for Motte to show up. It's been 34 games and I can't point to one thing that indicates he's an NHL player.

EDIT: In fact, I think the one of the best things McLellan can do right out of the gate is to tell all of the UofM boys that, "it's cute that you all went to school together down the road, but that doesn't mean shit to me, start playing like you want to stay in the NHL."

His stats are not great, but he plays every shift with energy. Almost all the rest of the team doesn't play each shift that way. If the rest of the team played with his energy we might actually be doing good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockeyville USA

Gniwder

Registered User
Oct 12, 2009
15,359
8,493
Bellingham, WA
His biggest downfall as a head coach has been playoff success. But with a gm like Steve Yzerman, this may very well be the best opportunity he has to finally break that barrier in time.
It took Barry Trotz 11 tries to get past the second round, and he won the Cup.

As for playoff success, that's really gonna depend on how MBN, Danielson, and Cossa/Gus turn out. Teams without a 2C generally don't make it past the first round.
 

sepster

Gerard Gallant is my Spirit Animal
Aug 19, 2005
2,433
1,577
North of the 'D"
It took Barry Trotz 11 tries to get past the second round, and he won the Cup.

As for playoff success, that's really gonna depend on how MBN, Danielson, and Cossa/Gus turn out. Teams without a 2C generally don't make it past the first round.

And Joel Quenneville. He was a head coach for 12 seasons, getting fired once, missing the playoffs another time, and not once making it to the finals before winning his first Cup. Most of his tenure with the Blues I thought he was an overrated, underachieving hack. Turns out he was a decent coach... just a total scumbag too.
 

Gniwder

Registered User
Oct 12, 2009
15,359
8,493
Bellingham, WA
BTW, Chiarot usually plays better with a new coach for a couple of dozen games. He'll start doing stupid shit once he finds his comfort zone, so I hope Todd keeps him uncomfortable, lol.

Just figured I'd mention it here as a prediction because he'll play well for a while.... then leave everyone wondering why he went back to playing like shit at the end of the season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LongTimeDRWF

LongTimeDRWF

Registered User
Feb 10, 2024
496
330
NS
BTW, Chiarot usually plays better with a new coach for a couple of dozen games. He'll start doing stupid shit once he finds his comfort zone, so I hope Todd keeps him uncomfortable, lol.

Just figured I'd mention it here as a prediction because he'll play well for a while.... then leave everyone wondering why he went back to playing like shit at the end of the season.
Maybe play well enough for long enough to get traded before the TDL?
 

FMichael

Registered User
Dec 22, 2010
6,172
6,362
Wisconsin

[Bultman] Todd McLellan talked last night about the Red Wings looking mechanical. At today’s practice, one of the coaching points we could hear from up top was, “Play f***ing hockey. You’re done it your whole lives.”​

A-f***ingmen!

Lalonde’s horrible ‘system’ saw competent players devolve into dog feces under his tenure.

It was apparent after his 1st season that he was at best a Blashill clone…He should have been relieved of his position this past spring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PelagicJoe

FMichael

Registered User
Dec 22, 2010
6,172
6,362
Wisconsin
BTW, Chiarot usually plays better with a new coach for a couple of dozen games. He'll start doing stupid shit once he finds his comfort zone, so I hope Todd keeps him uncomfortable, lol.

Just figured I'd mention it here as a prediction because he'll play well for a while.... then leave everyone wondering why he went back to playing like shit at the end of the season.
From what I’ve seen of Chiarot prior to joining Detroit - he’s at his best while playing as a ‘rover’ - jumping into the play, pinching in at the blue line, basically a higher risk = higher reward type…Just needs a solid stay at home type of partner that’s willing to put with him.
 

Gniwder

Registered User
Oct 12, 2009
15,359
8,493
Bellingham, WA
From what I’ve seen of Chiarot prior to joining Detroit - he’s at his best while playing as a ‘rover’ - jumping into the play, pinching in at the blue line, basically a higher risk = higher reward type…Just needs a solid stay at home type of partner that’s willing to put with him.

I agree, but he needs to have enough brains to be the stay at home guy when he's playing with a partner that can move the puck better. He's got 1.5 seasons to figure that out so he can extend his career. Otherwise his next contract will be under $2M for one or two years.

I'm hoping Todd lays into him. The problem with rookie coaches is that sometimes they aren't confident enough to yell at a veteran player. Todd has more experience as head coach than Chiarot has in the NHL, so no issues and no excuses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FMichael

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
16,876
11,448
From what I’ve seen of Chiarot prior to joining Detroit - he’s at his best while playing as a ‘rover’ - jumping into the play, pinching in at the blue line, basically a higher risk = higher reward type…Just needs a solid stay at home type of partner that’s willing to put with him.

Really. To me Chiarot has the skill set to be stay in his own end and play physical in front of the net and defensive end. All his "offensive" stuff is largely passes to nobody or people in bad spots to get a pass. To me, the way he plays is as someone who thinks they have a lot more skill than they actually do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PelagicJoe

Henkka

Registered User
Jan 31, 2004
32,416
13,461
Tampere, Finland
From what I’ve seen of Chiarot prior to joining Detroit - he’s at his best while playing as a ‘rover’ - jumping into the play, pinching in at the blue line, basically a higher risk = higher reward type…Just needs a solid stay at home type of partner that’s willing to put with him.

I think it should work with Seider, when Seider stays down low to make is super-safe. Just like Lidström wasn't the first D up. It was just impossible to score against that.

Lidström many times evaded back and then did make the killer pass straight up, which Seider is also able to do. Fooled the whole opposite forechekers.
 

Henkka

Registered User
Jan 31, 2004
32,416
13,461
Tampere, Finland
What I did like in these new lines, was finding Veleno a new role with Larkin and Raymond. They just thriwed against Caps, 16-5 in Corsi, 8-2 in shots, 8-3 in scoring chances and 4-1 in High-danger Corsi. 1-0 in Goals.

If that will stay effective, it will flow better talent to lower lines. That will create a deep offence, just like last year.

Also like Copp working best with DeBrincat and Kane, which was my off-season plan already. They were also 56% in xGF% and goals went 2-0. Copp is the perfect worker between two skill wingers, we just have to admit that. Also DeBrincat was great making two screens.

As for now, they are creating a Deep Top9 maybe even Top12 offense, instead of that Lalonde Top6 - Bottom6 (with a strong bulldozer line), which was, imo - stone-aged thinking. Maybe it worked at Tampa, but not with Red Wings player material.

Berggren - Compher - Tarasenko line did not work well, they lost their puck possession pretty bad, but they have all the tools to be a great combo.

Ras - Kasper - Motte were on small ice-time, but did well.

Also the defense is now split with Chiarot-Seider and Edvinsson-Petry, also my off-season plan. Just funny now. I don't know in which world Lalonde lived, but these things looked as the off-season plan on paper, and now they are completing it. Also kids (Seider and Ed) are getting heavy minutes, carrying their weak partners, and 3rd pair not getting much ice-time at all. That's great and aggressive coaching/usage.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad