Confirmed with Link: Wings Fire Lalonde and Hire Todd McLellan

Snuggs

Registered User
Jun 24, 2018
2,856
1,509
giphy.webp



The new "system".
 

JediOrderPizza

Registered User
Apr 15, 2012
7,076
9,433
Tampa, Fl
I was ok with ride it out but man when you see Larkin after the last game. You can understand trying to at least turn the mood around so it doesn't infect into next season.

Don't see this as a panic move, it's almost Jan 1st. Panic would've been way earlier, also don't think Yzerman is dumb enough to think this puts playoffs on the map at all.
 

Pavels Dog

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
21,043
16,986
Sweden
A change needed to happen. Let's see what Mclellan can do. I'm glad we're bringing in a guy with experience because two 1st time NHL head coaches in a row brings some lingering questions. I like Lalonde and think he shouldn't have much issue finding employment (albeit he may need to go back to an assistant role before getting another HC opportunity), but it's nice to have a coach with an established track record. I'm not expecting any magic being worked with the roster as it stands, but ideally we start seeing some systems that actually click and give this team some energy.
 

JoesuffP

Registered User
Feb 3, 2016
620
352
Second coach Yzerman has fired.

There shouldn't be a third for most GMs before it's their turn.
I wouldn’t count Blashill as a knock on Yzerman but going back to back first time NHL head coach’s was a mistake with a young team in hindsight. A lot of its gotta be just leading a room. Imagine Lalonde getting in the centre of the room and demanding your attention. I don’t see it
 

theYman

Registered User
Feb 28, 2008
21,994
2,058
Didn't even know McClellan was available. This came out of nowhere. It's a multi year deal. Does anyone know how long it is?
 

OgeeOgelthorpe

Riccis per 60 record holder
Feb 29, 2020
18,386
20,177
I genuinely think MacLellan is a good coach and I’m very glad yzerman went with someone experienced.

That said, I feel weirdly pessimistic about this move.

While I don’t think Lalonde was the answer here, I think I would have preferred to ride that out.

Making a change like this suggest yzerman felt the team was underachieving and wants to push for playoffs. When I look at the roster, I’m not sure I buy that. I also think an “accidental” top pick would have done wonders for the rebuild.

It feels a little too panicky to excite me.

I guess we’ll see.

The situation with Lalonde was downright toxic since the start of the year. The number of games the Wings actually outplayed their competition I can count on one hand. You ride him out you're sending a really bad message to all players on the team, including your core pieces.
 

ShanahanMan

Registered User
Jan 31, 2009
3,421
1,969
Tokyo, Japan
A change needed to happen. Let's see what Mclellan can do. I'm glad we're bringing in a guy with experience because two 1st time NHL head coaches in a row brings some lingering questions. I like Lalonde and think he shouldn't have much issue finding employment (albeit he may need to go back to an assistant role before getting another HC opportunity), but it's nice to have a coach with an established track record. I'm not expecting any magic being worked with the roster as it stands, but ideally we start seeing some systems that actually click and give this team some energy.
At this point we don’t want magic. We want to finish at the bottom but still at least have entertaining hockey. Those losses against Van and NJ were games I would love to continue seeing and still finish bottom 5.

Btw Steve it would be nice if you could do an actual press conference here and there and give some insight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: David D

Retire91

Stevey Y you our Guy
May 31, 2010
6,362
1,828
Wow great to hear Todd McLellan should be able to get things going. I think Yzerman was trying to replicate the success of Cooper with Lalonde and it just wasn't happening. I think Yzerman planned to ride out the contract but things are just too dismal to not make a course correction.
 

OgeeOgelthorpe

Riccis per 60 record holder
Feb 29, 2020
18,386
20,177
A change needed to happen. Let's see what Mclellan can do. I'm glad we're bringing in a guy with experience because two 1st time NHL head coaches in a row brings some lingering questions. I like Lalonde and think he shouldn't have much issue finding employment (albeit he may need to go back to an assistant role before getting another HC opportunity), but it's nice to have a coach with an established track record. I'm not expecting any magic being worked with the roster as it stands, but ideally we start seeing some systems that actually click and give this team some energy.

I liked Lalonde being hired initially, and love the idea of busting up the old boys club of NHL coaches. However, there was an interview early in his tenure that rubbed me the wrong way.

In that interview he mentioned that back in 2018-19 not being a fan of Kucherov at all and stated he didn't think the team could win with him. That told me this was a guy that didn't know how to handle star players or players that didn't fit his mold.


I became less and less a fan of Lalonde after hearing this interview.

At the end of the day we're still icing Chiarot/Petry as our 2nd pairing.

Not expecting much.

Let's see what Mclellan does. Chiarot/Petry was Lalonde's doing.
 

FriendlyGhost92

Registered User
Jun 22, 2023
4,463
5,400
Let's see what Mclellan does. Chiarot/Petry was Lalonde's doing.

I mean it doesn't really matter what McLellan does in that regard. It doesn't matter if it's Petry or Holl, both are a shit option for a 2RHD. Gustafsson is shit. Chiarot is usually shit. Yeah you can put Edvinsson with Petry to carry around his dead weight, but is that much better of an option?

Maybe you give Seider AlJo to drag around? Maybe? AlJo ain't good enough for that but he can probably be passable to get Edvinsson to carry Petry's dead ass.
 

OgeeOgelthorpe

Riccis per 60 record holder
Feb 29, 2020
18,386
20,177
I mean it doesn't really matter what McLellan does in that regard. It doesn't matter if it's Petry or Holl, both are a shit option for a 2RHD. Gustafsson is shit. Chiarot is usually shit. Yeah you can put Edvinsson with Petry to carry around his dead weight, but is that much better of an option?

Maybe you give Seider AlJo to drag around? Maybe? AlJo ain't good enough for that but he can probably be passable to get Edvinsson to carry Petry's dead ass.

Maybe this is just the first move? Maybe Detroit can get a passable D like Schenn from another bottom feeder like Nashville? (I know Frk it hates this idea but I don't care.)

There's better line combinations for the forwards that we just weren't seeing as well. Maybe we'll see that instead of spreading the talent so thin that we end up with a mediocre 2nd line, mediocre 3rd line and 2 4th lines. This team doesn't have major underdog potential like last year's team did but they should be far better than they are now.
 

ShanahanMan

Registered User
Jan 31, 2009
3,421
1,969
Tokyo, Japan
I liked Lalonde being hired initially, and love the idea of busting up the old boys club of NHL coaches. However, there was an interview early in his tenure that rubbed me the wrong way.

In that interview he mentioned that back in 2018-19 not being a fan of Kucherov at all and stated he didn't think the team could win with him. That told me this was a guy that didn't know how to handle star players or players that didn't fit his mold.


I became less and less a fan of Lalonde after hearing this interview.



Let's see what Mclellan does. Chiarot/Petry was Lalonde's doing.

Thank god I no longer have to hear about Newsy’s “system” ever the f*** again
 

SCD

Registered User
Apr 8, 2018
1,687
1,116
These boys are going to learn how to play defense real quick.

I don't think you will see Edvinsson carrying the puck into the o-zone very often.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad