Kravtsov420
Registered User
- May 4, 2019
- 5,563
- 7,399
I guess it really was the (no)brain-trust running things when Quinn was coach too. The inmates were running the asylum.
Yet here we are, we hitched our horses to the winning core of Kreider-Panarin-Zibby-and Tuba. The veterans scream and cry when they don't get their touches, but yet can't show up for 60 to play what they're being paid millions for.
It's time for a culture change. Merit based play and performance should be the determining factor for roles and ice-time. Kreider shouldn't have even been looking at the ice in OT nevermind being on it. It makes me sick.
This is why it's important for young players to get on the PP and be given all the attention/time in the world. Eventually they'll have to take the reigns, and become leaders of the team. If you keep them in smaller roles, they won't know how or can't take the reins when the time comes.
IMO we're seeing the results of an experiment (first true rebuild in NY Ranger history) and what happens when a team that has 1 cup since carrier pigeons were a primary form of communication, thinks they know better than every other team in the league on how to develop players (specifically, star forwards).
We all had a hypothesis on how this should be handled. Ease the kids into it, give them smaller roles. Or give them as much ice time and truly focus on their development. It's no secret why you have younger players come into the league and contribute on other teams. It's because they're put into a position to succeed.
And don't tell me all the guys we drafted are busts. It's almost statistically impossible.
We have a deep-rooted systemic problem with this organization's philosophy when it comes to development. Where the cracks are? Idk.
Yet here we are, we hitched our horses to the winning core of Kreider-Panarin-Zibby-and Tuba. The veterans scream and cry when they don't get their touches, but yet can't show up for 60 to play what they're being paid millions for.
It's time for a culture change. Merit based play and performance should be the determining factor for roles and ice-time. Kreider shouldn't have even been looking at the ice in OT nevermind being on it. It makes me sick.
This is why it's important for young players to get on the PP and be given all the attention/time in the world. Eventually they'll have to take the reigns, and become leaders of the team. If you keep them in smaller roles, they won't know how or can't take the reins when the time comes.
IMO we're seeing the results of an experiment (first true rebuild in NY Ranger history) and what happens when a team that has 1 cup since carrier pigeons were a primary form of communication, thinks they know better than every other team in the league on how to develop players (specifically, star forwards).
We all had a hypothesis on how this should be handled. Ease the kids into it, give them smaller roles. Or give them as much ice time and truly focus on their development. It's no secret why you have younger players come into the league and contribute on other teams. It's because they're put into a position to succeed.
And don't tell me all the guys we drafted are busts. It's almost statistically impossible.
We have a deep-rooted systemic problem with this organization's philosophy when it comes to development. Where the cracks are? Idk.