Chytilmania
Registered User
- Dec 31, 2017
- 4,766
- 7,284
Mika was insane today. If he shoots a few and stops passing to Kreider he could have easily had at least one more goal.
He was on the wall battling for the puck and his leg got caught a littleMissed most of this game. What happened to KK?
was so dynamic and game changing.... with his turnoversgood game today from Raymond.
eh. 13-14 has the by far superior 4th line but that's it.Right now this team is the 2013-14 Rangers with better high end talent and slightly worse depth.
how does this team have worse depth?
We had our only #1 pick in existence, on the 4th line to start this game
I was wondering that too. He had me up until worse depth. Since the deadline, we're much deeper.how does this team have worse depth?
We had our only #1 pick in existence, on the 4th line to start this game
We got a Happy Passover, Happy Easter, Happy Rangers.
Also, what do you weigh? 55 is ridiculous. You can’t possibly have much of a slap shot unless you’re like 130lbs. I would DESTROY a 55 flex. Even on a wrister it would feel like a noodle. 77 is the absolute lowest I can tolerate and 87 is better if I want some balance between a slap shot and a wrist shot. Plus a 55 is likely, technically an intermediate twig and thus a little thinner than a senior stick, another reason I’d snap them like dry spaghetti.
IDK Pouliot-Brass-Zucc is tough to beat as a "3rd" line.eh. 13-14 has the by far superior 4th line but that's it.
I get it, we had a decent top9 in that season... No where near the ceiling this team has.More so giving a tip of the hat to the Brassard third line which is better than our 3rd line though those guys have been pretty good lately.
were they a third line? i remember them playing 2nd line minutes in the playoffs. Hag-Richards-MSL was more the 3rd line.IDK Pouliot-Brass-Zucc is tough to beat as a "3rd" line.
These top 2 lines blow Rick Nash and the TBL 2004 retirement tour out of the water thoughIDK Pouliot-Brass-Zucc is tough to beat as a "3rd" line.