Post-Game Talk: Willy Hatty: Leafs Win!

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
It took Keefe till around this time last year to figure out where to put Domi, hopefully Berube has realized it too

Hell, if they really want to I'm not against stacking the second line and having something like this:

Knies - Matthews - Domi
Nylander - Tavares - Marner
McMann - 3C - Robertson
Lorentz - Kampf - Dewar
I much prefer stacking 3 lines.
Also, Robertson is literally useless. Not on my roster.

Knies Matthews Domi
Patches JT Marner
McMann New 3C Nylander
Lorentz Kampf Holmberg
 
This idea we were more direct and less turnovers last night, Tatti just said we had 27 last night. Didn't seem that high, but...
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Cleetus
Maybe go watch it again. They waved it off for a high stick. There was angle right at ice level that showed it. The top of Wolfs head was at the crossbar.
I'm watching all angles of the replay. The connection point was at the crossbar, not above, which should still be a goal. Tavares hit it below the top of Wolf's head. It bounced over.
 
It wasn't above the crossbar, and the puck was hit in the air, not out of his glove.

like JL resume it pretty well for highbstick

an they had a goalie interference because on his 1st swing, he just hit Wolf glove and made him lost controle ( Where goalie interference wqs) he hit the puck on his sefond attempt but the goalie. This goal would had been called back in a way or an other
 
an they had a goalie interference because on his 1st swing, he just hit Wolf glove and made him lost control
Wolf never had control, and it wasn't challenged or called off for goalie interference. In the end, it didn't matter, but a pretty bad call.
 
Wolf never had control, and it wasn't challenged or called off for goalie interference. In the end, it didn't matter, but a pretty bad call.

Had full control of it or no, if you hit the goalie and disallowed him to make him job exemple using his glove to grab puck in the air... Its goalie interference.

And yes Calgary didn't had to go on challenge but they would won it
 
Wolf never had control, and it wasn't challenged or called off for goalie interference. In the end, it didn't matter, but a pretty bad call.
Tavares stick hitting his glove caused the puck to go straight up in the air to where Tavares makes contact with it above the cross bar. Woll skated into Huberdeaus stick. He never hit his blocker with it. It wasnt a bad call it was the right call.
 
Tavares stick hitting his glove caused the puck to go straight up in the air to where Tavares makes contact with it above the cross bar. Woll skated into Huberdeaus stick. He never hit his blocker with it. It wasnt a bad call it was the right call.
That was a BS splitting hairs call. If we were Boston that was good goal for being inconclusive.
 
Had full control of it or no, if you hit the goalie and disallowed him to make him job exemple using his glove to grab puck in the air... Its goalie interference.
And yes Calgary didn't had to go on challenge but they would won it
Tavares stick hitting his glove caused the puck to go straight up in the air to where Tavares makes contact with it above the cross bar.
Tavares made a play on the puck, not the goalie, and Wolf was capable of doing his job. We have seen much more egregious contact not be called goalie interference, and it was not called off for goalie interference. If Calgary wants to risk that challenge, they need to make it. The high stick call that was made to disallow the goal was wrong.
 
It took Keefe till around this time last year to figure out where to put Domi, hopefully Berube has realized it too

Hell, if they really want to I'm not against stacking the second line and having something like this:

Knies - Matthews - Domi
Nylander - Tavares - Marner
McMann - 3C - Robertson
Lorentz - Kampf - Dewar
Sell the farm for a 2C.

Knies - Matthews(1) - Domi
McMann - Tavares(3) - Nylander(2)
Robertson - 2C - maner(4)

(Cap hit)

Roberson with marner feeding him pucks ...

When required Leafs can load up, and with a new 2C they can spread the workload out.
 
Sell the farm for a 2C.

Knies - Matthews(1) - Domi
McMann - Tavares(3) - Nylander(2)
Robertson - 2C - maner(4)

(Cap hit)

Roberson with marner feeding him pucks ...

When required Leafs can load up, and with a new 2C they can spread the workload out.
Is it wrong that I want us to get Brock Nelson solely so we could have a line called the Willy-Nelson line??

After years here, I’m still amused at the hills certain “posters” are willing to die on in the blink of an eye. It would be amusing if it weren’t so tedious….
 
  • Haha
Reactions: GoonieFace
Tavares stick hitting his glove caused the puck to go straight up in the air to where Tavares makes contact with it above the cross bar. Woll skated into Huberdeaus stick. He never hit his blocker with it. It wasnt a bad call it was the right call.

I didn't think the Tavares would count, and even thought Tavares could get a high sticking penalty out of it.

The blue paint is the goalies area, if you are in the bluepaint and inhibit the goalies ability to make a stop you are interfering.

1738779492224.png

1738779688974.png

1738779754775.png

1738779787872.png
 
Tavares made a play on the puck, not the goalie, and Wolf was capable of doing his job. We have seen much more egregious contact not be called goalie interference, and it was not called off for goalie interference. If Calgary wants to risk that challenge, they need to make it. The high stick call that was made to disallow the goal was wrong.

probably a picture would be easier to understand

Screenshot_20250205_132101_Chrome.jpg


At this exact moment, the puck is on Wolf glove... So please don't tell me they are no goalie interference, the hit on Wolf glove is The only reason why the puck bounce in the air. They had no chance at all than this goal could count
 
At this exact moment, the puck is on Wolf glove... So please don't tell me they are no goalie interference, the hit on Wolf glove is The only reason why the puck bounce in the air.
The puck bounces in the air because Wolf never closes his glove and fumbles it.
I don't care whether you think it would have been goalie interference. That wasn't the call. The call, and the reason the goal was called back, was high stick, and that call was wrong. It didn't matter in the end, so let's move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duffman955
The puck bounces in the air because Wolf never closes his glove and fumbles it.
I don't care whether you think it would have been goalie interference. That wasn't the call. The call, and the reason the goal was called back, was high stick, and that call was wrong. It didn't matter in the end, so let's move on.

How do you want to control the puck when you got slashed right on your glove? please tell me how

Hes got the ouck in his gloave, get slashed... play is done everything happening after doesn't matter. Did he kept the puck or not doesn't matter, JT interfered with Wolf ability to make the save.
 
The puck bounces in the air because Wolf never closes his glove and fumbles it.
I don't care whether you think it would have been goalie interference. That wasn't the call. The call, and the reason the goal was called back, was high stick, and that call was wrong. It didn't matter in the end, so let's move on.
With picture and video evidence id hate to be in a jury deliberations with you.
 
Last edited:
Is it wrong that I want us to get Brock Nelson solely so we could have a line called the Willy-Nelson line??

After years here, I’m still amused at the hills certain “posters” are willing to die on in the blink of an eye. It would be amusing if it weren’t so tedious….
Makes perfect sense to me
 
How do you want to control the puck when you got slashed right on your glove?
He didn't get slashed on the glove. The glove and stick brushed against each other as they both made a play on the incoming puck. Wolf had a chance to control the puck. He fumbled it. And all that has zero relevance to the bad call that reversed the goal. We'll just have to agree to disagree.
With picture and video evidence of hate to be in a jury deliberations with you.
The picture and video evidence supports my position. Not the first wrong call made by the NHL, and it won't be the last.
 
probably a picture would be easier to understand

View attachment 973012

At this exact moment, the puck is on Wolf glove... So please don't tell me they are no goalie interference, the hit on Wolf glove is The only reason why the puck bounce in the air. They had no chance at all than this goal could count
I don't think that matters.

If a puck is on a goalies pad it is available.

On equipment isn't in control.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad