Gary Nylund
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2013
- 31,541
- 25,242
I agree, I'm just saying that for me, playoffs is much more important. M&M&JT are a weird outlier, I don't remember seeing anything like it - playoff production taking such a huge dip. For 99% of players it's like you say, the start players continue playing like stars in the playoffs, we just happen to have 3 guys that fall into that 1%, it's like the team is cursed.I guess we will see if he’s able to bring it back, sure hope he is able to
Then I guess we just wait till JT comes back or we make an acquisition for a 3C, but that’s going to mean this season will be a burn for him to live up to the RS, hopefully he lives up to it in the playoffs as that’s more important and he will have better players to play with
Some good points in there, things I would say are:
1)This doesn't just apply to Nylander, but to them all but I really don’t think the “playoffs is all we need”. Look at the best playoff performers around. Mcdavid, Draisaitl, Mackinnon, Rantanen, Kucherov. They don't just have a switch and turn it on game 1 of the playoffs, they have sustained dominance throughout the regular season and then continue it into the playoffs. Not only as a fan is that more entertaining for the regular season + playoffs, but I think to a certain extent it helps the players and team going in. If Nylander and Marner go into the playoffs as 70 point players is it really logical to think they'll all of a sudden elevate their games to higher levels? I for one don't believe that and so want them to dominate the regular season and lead that into the playoffs. Now obviously I don't want them to go 100% balls to the walls and risk injury, but I don't see why they can't compete with the leagues best.
That's fair. And I don't mind comparing them, I'm just saying that we should also compare them to other players around the league and not read too much into a 1 vs 1 player comparison.2) Only compare Marner and Nylaner because they are both RW, same team, and as of now make similar money, when/if marner is bumped up to like 13-14 than there won't be a comparison again
Fair enough, agree to disagree.3) I don't really agree with the goals > assists. In fact I am quite the opposite and even in play styles I take the playmaker over the goal scorer, especially if we are speaking about high level elite talent. Take any goal scorer and their PPG, GPG, and impact always drops. Matthews, Ovechkin, Pastnak, Stamkos...etc and they are always having their goal totals and paces fall off come playoffs. Now compare that to Mackinnon, Mcdavid, Kucherov, Crosby...etc and they are much better and higher end producers. It's also not surprising that for most of the time, the leagues best player is a playmaker (Mcdavid, Kucherov, Crosby, Mackinnon) whereas the goal scorer at best has a few years like ovechkin, or a single year like matthews.
I'll just say that out of our 4 star forwards, Nylander's the only one who's earned his cap hit in the playoffs, the only one who's production hasn't taken a massive dip in the playoffs and I can't ask for more than that. My beef is with the other 3 guys.4) Nylander in my eyes (maybe biased) 100% underproduces his talent. We got a glimpse of his full potential if he gave a shit every game before he signed the contract, we've seen glimpses in periods of the playoffs too (game 6 boston, montreal series, 3rd period florida game 2) but he never is consistent enough. Out of the core 4, Nylander and Matthews are the ones who I can actually criticize their "effort", the other two is always about "execution" and "playstyle". At his best Nylander can be a 100+ point player and a series changer similar to how marner and matthews should be, but he never can or will be able to put it together.