Player Discussion William Nylander

ULF_55

Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
87,769
19,652
Mountain Standard Ti
Visit site
It's actually continuously brought up, despite being pretty meaningless. Looking exclusively at production relative to salary or regular season production is a way to pretend that Nylander is better in the playoffs than the others, despite that not being true.

So is saying Player X scores Y goals bothers some people?

Can you explain why?
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40

francis246

Registered User
Nov 16, 2007
14,822
18,417
So is saying Player X scores Y goals bothers some people?

Can you explain why?

The constant in fighting between fans on here between Nylander and Marner is just stupid to me. Who cares ultimately. We have both. Both are good at different things. Let’s just enjoy them while we have them.

Nylander is having a hell of a season might win a rocket.
 

BraveCanadian

Registered User
Jun 30, 2010
15,538
4,942
The constant in fighting between fans on here between Nylander and Marner is just stupid to me. Who cares ultimately. We have both. Both are good at different things. Let’s just enjoy them while we have them.

Nylander is having a hell of a season might win a rocket.

Truth, and Nylander is hot right now that is for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: francis246

Tie Domi Esquire

Go Real Sports Apparel Go!
Oct 18, 2010
3,493
1,458
Cause it's totally the Nylander thread that's got a group of the most active posters on the board actively running a PR campaign for him and bending over backwards to debunk any criticism made against him.

People are saying he has a good contract
 

ULF_55

Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
87,769
19,652
Mountain Standard Ti
Visit site
I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Nobody is bothered by player x scoring y goals.

Great.

So during his last contract he matched Matthews in goals during the playoffs.
No judgement, but they both lead the team in goals in the playoffs during Nylander's last contract.
Did it in 1 less game, while making $4.6mm less per year.


1735162269475.png
 

DitchMarner

TheGlitchintheSwitch
Jul 21, 2017
11,287
8,326
Brampton, ON
He was great right before the break. I'd say he was the Leafs' best player against BUF and then obviously the most dangerous versus NYI.

He has a great shot and his goal scoring seems to continually improve, but I'd like to see more nice set-ups by him (like the ones in the BUF game). He has the puck skills, vision and passing to be an effective playmaker.

Hoping he stays in the Rocket race. If he can win or at least score 50 or so, that should be a successful season.
 

DitchMarner

TheGlitchintheSwitch
Jul 21, 2017
11,287
8,326
Brampton, ON
I think some lumped Nylander in with the double digits for years, when he was 5th. on the team for compensation.

$7mm + 50% = 10.5mm

Last contract:

View attachment 951125

Ugh. I didn't realize Tavares was quite that disappointing/poor in the playoffs. I mean, you have to think a guy like Kadri could have provided close to that level of production for quite a bit cheaper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40

nuck

Schrodingers Cat
Aug 18, 2005
11,630
2,667
Great.

So during his last contract he matched Matthews in goals during the playoffs.
No judgement, but they both lead the team in goals in the playoffs during Nylander's last contract.
Did it in 1 less game, while making $4.6mm less per year.


View attachment 951391
But aren't you still just comparing two fails? Being slightly less dead weight doesn't really move the needle. With a better coach and even slightly stronger goaltending the Leaf's last 5 years play out a lot differently and that's the thing. If your data sample is a whole bunch of first round losses, that only tells you who may have been slightly fresher or more prepared or healthier for the post season. Nobody has done anything noteworthy. Every year there are a whole bunch of players who had a ppg in the playoffs for one series that aren't in the conversation of being a top 20 player in the league. Its measuring nothing except which players are having a couple of good games or coach is finding the gaps first. Dinky and therefore unreliable samples.
 

ULF_55

Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
87,769
19,652
Mountain Standard Ti
Visit site
But aren't you still just comparing two fails? Being slightly less dead weight doesn't really move the needle. With a better coach and even slightly stronger goaltending the Leaf's last 5 years play out a lot differently and that's the thing. If your data sample is a whole bunch of first round losses, that only tells you who may have been slightly fresher or more prepared or healthier for the post season. Nobody has done anything noteworthy. Every year there are a whole bunch of players who had a ppg in the playoffs for one series that aren't in the conversation of being a top 20 player in the league. Its measuring nothing except which players are having a couple of good games or coach is finding the gaps first. Dinky and therefore unreliable samples.
I was stating facts.

What are you talking about.

Double jointed?
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,601
16,280
I wasn't making a judgement or stating an opinion. Just stating fact. Most goals during that period. Not sure where you are going with your post here?
I also just stated facts. Most goals during a period doesn't equal best player. The question is where you're trying to go with your post.
Goals win games my brother………
More factors into winning than just goals for, and more factors into goals than just the last person to touch the puck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Racer88

notDatsyuk

Registered User
Jul 20, 2018
11,663
9,759
But aren't you still just comparing two fails? Being slightly less dead weight doesn't really move the needle. With a better coach and even slightly stronger goaltending the Leaf's last 5 years play out a lot differently and that's the thing. If your data sample is a whole bunch of first round losses, that only tells you who may have been slightly fresher or more prepared or healthier for the post season. Nobody has done anything noteworthy. Every year there are a whole bunch of players who had a ppg in the playoffs for one series that aren't in the conversation of being a top 20 player in the league. Its measuring nothing except which players are having a couple of good games or coach is finding the gaps first. Dinky and therefore unreliable samples.
If you want to look at it as nothing more than "two fails", sure, but that means Matthews and Reeves are comparable players, as they both failed last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad