If Dubas trades him I will be fully on the fire dubas parade float... ouff what a terrible decision that would be. To me, if we are trading someone, not that I am saying we should, would be someone other than 91, 88 or 34.
If Dubas trades him I will be fully on the fire dubas parade float... ouff what a terrible decision that would be. To me, if we are trading someone, not that I am saying we should, would be someone other than 91, 88 or 34.
Holy hell.....He looks like the only one who cares.Can we have more players like Nylander?
I don't think he trades Nylander. He loves him.If Dubas trades him I will be fully on the fire dubas parade float... ouff what a terrible decision that would be. To me, if we are trading someone, not that I am saying we should, would be someone other than 91, 88 or 34.
Marner has assists though?Holy hell.....He looks like the only one who cares.
Can't wait for the anti-Nylander crew to show up.
Marner looks MUCH worse than Willy did last year. But he will get protected by Dada and his crew.
bUt pOiNtS mEaN eVeRyThInG.Marner has assists though?
Like seriously.....what was the agenda there? Yikes.One of.the bright spots tonight.
Congrats to Nylander on making that HNIC panel look like fools hitting 30 goals well before seaons end
First it was mono, and then It was Bozak and JVR's fault. Next he needs to play with Matthews. Whats the excuse now?bUt pOiNtS mEaN eVeRyThInG.
I kind of feel that way whenever Kelly Hrudey says anything at all. LolKelly Hrudey sure looks like an idiot for saying Nylander is awful and he wouldn't want him on his team
In a perfect word, we would keep all 4. I’d like to keep all 4 too. But who else would you trade or sign to significantly upgrade the defence without money going out. The 40 million across 4 forwards experiment is not working. Unless the cap increases as significant as predicted, I have no faith in next season with the same type of defence.
34 is untouchable. Will you really trade 91 after a season of making him Captain.. can you even trade him with his nmc? You’re going to have to pick 16/88... hard decisions...
Like seriously.....what was the agenda there? Yikes.
Nylander has 58 points in 67 games.Yup Nylander has outplayed Marner this year the most consistent player this year. Just tells you how great of a year he is having.
Nylander has 58 points in 67 games.
Marner has 65 points in 58 games.
Who has outperformed who?
Please explain the numbers, if you would be so kind.Nylander
Well first off, raw points is a bad way to evaluate players.Please explain the numbers, if you would be so kind.
I got a bit curious about something based on an earlier discussion. Now, I'm far from a proponent of looking primarily at points to judge players, but when I do I like to look at non-empty net primary points. The non-empty netters is pretty obvious, you are more than five times more likely to score on an empty net, which makes it very questionable to give it the same weight as a normal point. And then primary points because that's the better indicator of the player himself.
Here's how that would look for our Big Four:
I think this lines up much better with my impressions this season, and I think it captures just the extent to which Matthews is our MVP this season. The offense he drives is just insane.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Player Raw Points Primary Points Without Empty Net Paced Differential Auston Matthews 77 63 59 0.89 0.28 Mitch Marner 64 46 41 0.74 0.42 John Tavares 58 49 46 0.78 0.2 William Nylander 57 47 47 0.73 0.16
Figured that it might be interesting to see how this looks under Keefe:
Matthews - 0.86
Marner - 0.76
Tavares - 0.78
Nylander - 0.83
You can really see the shift there. The other three are standing pat, but Nylander has jumped up to absolute elite level. And if you move past per game and use per 60 instead, you get:
Hello, Willy.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Player Full Season Sheldon Era Matthews 2.58 2.42 Marner 2.32* 2.22* Tavares 2.4 2.38 Nylander 2.44 2.75
* This excludes his PK minutes, as that would have been unfair to him.
Edit:
As a point of reference, here's this process with Draisaitl.
Raw Points - 102
Primary - 76
Minus ENP - 70
Per Game - 1,08
Per 60 - 2,97
What an absolute point producing machine that boy is.
So Marner is being penalized for empty net points?Well first off, raw points is a bad way to evaluate players.
But if you need to look at points... if you go to the Matthews thread, I did a breakdown that showed what kind of points they have put up. Marner has a bunch of empty net points and has been feeding off secondary assists. We do know, through studies made on this topic, that secondary assists to a large degree is driven more by context than the player. If you want to judge players individually, primary points does a better job of that than secondary assists.
Here's the posts in question: