saffronleaf
Registered User
21g, 21a, 42p
PPG under Keefe
Numbers will climb more once Tavares starts burying the tap ins.
PPG under Keefe
Numbers will climb more once Tavares starts burying the tap ins.
“Not yet”Imagine thinking his contract was a massive overpay?
![]()
Imagine thinking his contract was a massive overpay?
![]()
Imagine thinking his contract was a massive overpay?
![]()
He can't stop, won't stop.
We paid more than we should have. That doesn’t make it a bad contract right now. It should just be better.
Dubas just isn't allowed to get any credit from some fans.
Dude we lost our first rounder this year because dubas overpaid
We lost a first rounder because Lou signed an absolute anchor that was on the verge of costing us good roster players. The maximum you can argue that Matthews is overpaid is $1M, and that's a huge reach. Give us that cap space, and nothing would have changed. Marleau is still an anchor, he'll still put us in a f-ed up cap situation, and we'd still need to lose something of value because of it.Dude we lost our first rounder this year because dubas overpaid
We lost a first rounder because Lou signed an absolute anchor that was on the verge of costing us good roster players. The maximum you can argue that Matthews is overpaid is $1M, and that's a huge reach. Give us that cap space, and nothing would have changed. Marleau is still an anchor, he'll still put us in a f-ed up cap situation, and we'd still need to lose something of value because of it.
The lengths some go to complain about Dubas astounds me.
I would say there is one change; he is stronger. His stick is heavy and moving him off his skates is very difficult. His playing style is mostly the same, but the added strength is showing.Here's the thing with Nylander. Does the increased point pace really indicate a significant change in his play? To some degree, it certainly does. He's doing even better with Tavares than he did with Matthews, and that was a top duo for years. But a large part of that increase comes from the PP, where he's scoring at a three times higher pace for second best on the team, top 10 in the league. Is that a huge step forward for him? Well, we are talking about a player who led the league in primary points relative to ice time in his rookie season. He was simply not used that way since then.
People talk about improved hustle, and I agree that it's been there. He looks more confident, and when he's confident he has that puck hound mentality that almost all the great players have. However, that doesn't really impact the PP where he's seen a large part of the increase. There's also the net front presence, where he's been terrific this season. However, he went to the net a lot even in last years wasted season. There's just a huge difference between arriving there as an option for Tavares instead of Marleau.
So while I do think that he's better now than ever, I don't think it's a significant change in him personally. We've just paid him what teams usually pay one of their top offense drivers, and then put him in a secondary role.
The thing about opportunity is that if you give it to one player, you take it away from another. Here's where that is still a good thing. Getting bang for buck matters. So putting Nylander in that spot not only helps our on-ice results, but we also get more out of him for our cap dollars. PP production costs. Let's say that Mikheyev had gotten a full season (let's ignore the injury for this example) at that spot. He might add 20 more points, and become millions more expensive against the cap. By using Nylander there, we get the most out of his $7M while making our depth and support pieces cheaper.
This is how we should have used him even last season. Who cares about who deserves what? The only thing that matters is what's best for the team, and we let having him earn it overshadow that.