Salary-wise, Tavares should really be the one making that Nylander pairing work, but he has so many limitations to his game right now it isn't even funny. The $11 million all-star captain and center shouldn't be the product of a focused and engaged Nylander, he should be the one leading the charge and dragging Nylander up. But we've settled on such lowered expectations even suggesting that seems unrealistic.
hard to lead a guy who looks like he'd rather be anywhere else half the time, what would JT have to do different that Willie would get excited enough to do the things that he's getting paid for, you know score goals, back check, win pucks along the boards and in corners, go and jam in the blue paint 6'1" 210 he's built to do those things, he has
almost as much individual skill as Marner has, yet he sometimes seems less effective than Simmonds, less skilled than Kerfoot and not possessing much more footspeed than JT, but yet is one of the fastest Leafs, who happens to have skills coming out of his ying yang.
Neither MM, MB or AM is the single catalyst on L1, they take turns, sometimes it's all AM, sometime it's all MM and MB always has his motor going and when it's all 3 it's a powerful and intoxicating brew
JT isn't holding Will back, Kerf and/or Mikheyev aren't holding Will back. A pronounced absence of will more often than not holds Will back, it's been with him since his early days in Marlieville, successive coaches have seen fit to bench him from time to time when he seemed unable to be motivated or to motivate himself. Eventually he wakes up and starts "given 'er" as they say. If he was on 85% of the time he is easily a player who flirts with a PPG and maybe +.
His last ten is 4G 3A which is pretty good for most any top 6 guy, whereas JT is 0G 7A still OK, both those players are better than that however and both those players have to produce better, play with a lot more intensity and keep the puck out of their own end and on the other side of the redline.
Nobody at this level should need their hand held, which in a way you were describing!