westernhome
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2011
- 3,219
- 0
This is what kills me.
There's not normally retaliation if your enforcer loses a fair fight. Do I expect the next time Boston and Buffalo square off that it will be a more physical game? Yeah, I do, and I think most Bruin fans would take that kind of game and the Bruins win that type of game against Buffalo more often than not.
Scott and Thornton talked before the game about this match. Size disparity aside, it was a bout between two enforcers and Thorts lost. Was it dirty? Was there a penalty? Scott went with the Bruins' best fighter and knocked him out fairly. We don't often see other people challenging Thornton, Lucic, or McQuaid after they knock out the top guy from the other team.
The Bruins were supposed to retaliate because.....why?
Yeah, it serves to satiate some bloodthirst, but that's it, and it's far from being a wise strategy.
you missed the point, this wasn't about the fight itself, it is about Scott gesturing at the entire Bruins bench after, and Scott roughing up Seidenberg after, etc... that is the concerning thing