Will the 4 Nations tournament have any sway in terms of HOF candidacy?

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

SnowblindNYR

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 16, 2011
56,777
36,685
Brooklyn, NY
If it becomes a mainstay, I feel like Olympic medals make a difference. But to me it's kind of a made up tournament that is just replacing the All Star game. So being selected to the team I guess should count. But does winning count? Does the MVP count? No one ever cared who won the All Star Game and who the MVP was. And these aren't the Olympics that are over 100 years old and there are a lot more competitors than the 4 that we see in the 4 Nationals tournament.
 
unclebuckno.gif
 
It helps how people perceive Brady and Marner, but if they get in, their other accomplishments will have dwarfed this tournament
 
The 4 nation thing is only possibly because Russia is banned, as soon as Russia is back, there will never be 4 nation tournament as it means dropping Finland or Sweden
 
It was a one time thing, so no.

It only replaced the ASG this year. NHL is bringing it back next year and the year after, until the 2028 World Cup.

Really? I thought it would replace the ASG until they decided to change it. So why did they decide on it randomly this year?

The 4 nation thing is only possibly because Russia is banned, as soon as Russia is back, there will never be 4 nation tournament as it means dropping Finland or Sweden

Can't they just make it a 6 nation tournament with Czechia included?
 
HHOF already seems to mostly go by NHL accomplishments and to a lesser extent Olympics. Most anything else internationally like WC, WJHC, leagues outside the NHL, etc. are for all purposes ignored. 4 Nations will be as well. Summit Series was far more impactful internationally and I don’t think anyone really made or broke their candidacy based on it.
 
NOPE!
If it becomes a mainstay, I feel like Olympic medals make a difference. But to me it's kind of a made up tournament that is just replacing the All Star game. So being selected to the team I guess should count. But does winning count? Does the MVP count? No one ever cared who won the All Star Game and who the MVP was. And these aren't the Olympics that are over 100 years old and there are a lot more competitors than the 4 that we see in the 4 Nationals tournament.
 
An exhibition tournament? It has about as much legitimacy as a preseason game.

I felt this way too but with the reaction from the players winning it made me wonder if it'll be seen more like world championship than an exhibition tournament. People were comparing McDavid's goal to Crosby's in 2010 for crying out loud.

Edit: In the end if it was a one time thing my answer is clear. I thought this would be a yearly thing replacing the All Star game.
 
Really? I thought it would replace the ASG until they decided to change it. So why did they decide on it randomly this year?
I thought it was just a precursor to this:


They just didn't have all the logistics worked out yet (w/ Russia and all other countries not being completely nhl rosters) so they started small to get the ball rolling before Olympics.

I guess i never specifically read that anywhere, I just assumed? Idk
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR
They haven’t put Paul Henderson in for the 1972 Summit Series..although they put Tretiak in for losing it..and the 1980 Olympics
 
Wasn't Tretiak a legit legend of Soviet hockey? Was Paul Henderson ever that?

Tretiak could be argued to be the greatest goaltender of his generation. Paul Henderson was a role player who scored a goal at a key moment, which doesn't get you into the Hall of Fame. I doubt Justin Williams gets in either, for that matter.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad