Kennerback
Registered User
- Jun 2, 2021
- 5,233
- 8,492
In the savannah, you have predator and prey. Both have different survival and success strategies. If he’d be an animal Cooley would have the prey eyes on the side of the head like a hare, a squirrel or a gazelle. They survive by speed and smarts. If Slaf was an animal he’d have predator eyes like a lion or a bear. They survive by brute strength, power and killer instinct.This roster needs a Slaf more than a Cooley. I don't think there is going to be massive value difference between these two so the position of need (big winger who can play physical in the trenches) was a good pick.
Take Slaf out and insert Cooley and you have a very soft top 6. Nice on paper but you loose in the playoffs. We need Slaf to be a physical force freeing up space for Suzuki and Caufield. And when I say physical force, it doesn't have to be a monster type, he just needs to be strong along the walls and in front of the net. Wins more puck battles than he looses and that long stick/reach is an asset on the forecheck and closing gaps
The top preys like Gretzky, Kariya and Sakic can be NHL greats. Because their key tools are smarts and speed they can have success very quickly. Cooley is in the NHL because of his speed. He’s at the very top of the NHL speed chart with Newhook, another less skilled prey. If Cooley’d have Tkachuk’s speed he’d be a career minor leaguer.
PowerForward/Predators’ key tool is brute force. Athletes at the very earliest start getting an effective amount of it at 21 years old as trial and testing in other brute force sports like American Football have shown. Preys can get their peak seasons at 20, 21, and predators have them at 25+. Sundin, Neely and Getzlaf then become immovable forces.
Last edited: