Anyone else think a Richards for Spezza deal can be possible? If there really is truth to what Dreger says about Richards?
EDIT: Assuming the Sens do retain a bit of Spezza's contract..
Third consecutive year reaching the 3rd round since acquiring Richards, who was the best C for the Kings a year ago. His line has had some strong shifts, like getting the Kings going in Game 2. You guys need to chill and let this season play out. He'll be back next season, the team really values him as a leader, despite the salary and lack of production this season.
First on the agenda would be Kopi's new deal.
Anyone else think a Richards for Spezza deal can be possible? If there really is truth to what Dreger says about Richards?
EDIT: Assuming the Sens do retain a bit of Spezza's contract..
How awesome would be be if Brad Ricahrds were bought out, then signed a league minimum deal with us and then he has even more of a bounce back than Gaborik did
#itwouldfeelgoodman
The GM quoted in the article said it best, "LA has some tough decisions to make" , and maybe you are right, they will keep Richards for the life of the contract, but then that means the tough decision is losing some of the guys listed above.
How awesome would be be if Brad Ricahrds were bought out, then signed a league minimum deal with us and then he has even more of a bounce back than Gaborik did
#itwouldfeelgoodman
That's the kind of thinking I like. Let's not forget Nash.
I think the Rangers are only allowed one more buy out because they bought out Redden. At least that is what I heard on the NHL radio station (Sirius).
Only thing better would be to bring back Brad Richardson and put them all on a line so we could listen to Bob's head implode trying to call the game.
#puckedinthehead
Just because you keep repeating this over and over doesn't make it true. You keep claiming that the Kings are going to lose players. And I find it laughable that you throw Stoll into the discussion. You really care if he leaves as a UFA?
Hughson cannot be brought up without mentioningIt's bad enough having to listen to Hughson call both Richards' by their last names, we don't need the added confusion of 2 Richards' and a Richardson!
Hughson cannot be brought up without mentioning
well this thread made almost 400 posts before i decided to make my opinion known in it. If the team was going to buyout or move Richards why would they have played him in all the critical mins. The last min of pps or the last min of games. Teams looking to get rid of someone simply don't play them in the most crucial time in a game. Mike is a integral part of this cup winning team I question anyone thinking other wise. Now if going forward Mike decides he doesn't want to put the work in to get back his increased role and asks to go elsewhere I would suggest a likely landing spot would be Winnipeg where I've read in a different thread he may want to go to. His g/f wife is doctor in resident one of the Winnipeg hospitals He is from Kenora (like a couple hours away) He would get the most meanful role he likely wants mentoring young players while having a life with his wife/g/f I think Dean would try and get him to a place he wants to be. Richards has earned this imo.
All quite true and possible, but wouldn't one think that his agent has been quietly working the phones to gauge interest in the event Richards does get bought out? We'll know if that's true because, if he is bought out in the next 2 weeks, I wouldn't be surprised if there's an announced signing with a new team within 24 hours after. Will LA take the chance of buying him out and perhaps have him come back to bite them in the ass in the near future? Unless, of course, he is washed up in which case, he knows it and LA knows it. That scenario I don't believe, given his play-off performance and, as King stated above, the way Sutter used him. However, his new role with the Kings is somewhat diminished with the emergence of Carter and the bringing in of Gaborik. Time will tell.