Will Adam’s Be Fired ??

In your scenario he would get 12 years. In all reality, there is nothing I could say to make you look through the other lens and that's fine, I was the same way with Botterill.
Its not a scenario. Where were you the last 5 years? Adams literally said he has a 4 year plan to make the playoffs....

How many years has it been?

Adams is garbage and had no plan. He lied to us but I guess some people got fooled.
 
He's been remarkably inflexible. His goaltending plan for five years has been hopium.
I was hinting more towards Adams was doing a rebuild and that the first 1-3 years this team shouldn't have expected playoffs.

My timeline once Sam and Jack went was:

20/21 - bottom barrel
21/22 - bottom barrel
22/23 - bottom 8
23/24 - bottom 12
24/25 - either Wild Card 2 or just out of the playoffs.

Rebuilds are an ugly phase that rarely work. I am not the biggest fan of Adams but I can see what he is trying to do and the constraints previous regimes and he have put on this team with their decisions. Just because we don't want them to exist doesn't mean they don't exist and there isn't, most likely, a person who comes in and the Aura around the team goes away.
 
Its not a scenario. Where were you the last 5 years? Adams literally said he has a 4 year plan to make the playoffs....

How many years has it been?

Adams is garbage and had no plan. He lied to us but I guess some people got fooled.
You literally gave a scenario and compared it to your work scenario and based on the work scenario parameters it would give Adams 12 years ...

I also don't ever remember hearing anything about 4 years but I'll take your word for it. The thing is, just because someone says something, it doesn't always mean it's going to be to that exact spec.

Again, nothing i say is going to change your perspective of this, so we can just agree to disagree.
 
You literally gave a scenario and compared it to your work scenario and based on the work scenario parameters it would give Adams 12 years ...

I also don't ever remember hearing anything about 4 years but I'll take your word for it. The thing is, just because someone says something, it doesn't always mean it's going to be to that exact spec.

Again, nothing i say is going to change your perspective of this, so we can just agree to disagree.
You are literally arguing over a comment made in jest yet refuse to hold Adams responsible.

So you want to argue with me over a comment but give Adams a free pass on his comments.

Bizarre to say the least you will argue with me and try to hold me accountable but not Adams.
 
I was hinting more towards Adams was doing a rebuild and that the first 1-3 years this team shouldn't have expected playoffs.

My timeline once Sam and Jack went was:

20/21 - bottom barrel
21/22 - bottom barrel
22/23 - bottom 8
23/24 - bottom 12
24/25 - either Wild Card 2 or just out of the playoffs.

Rebuilds are an ugly phase that rarely work. I am not the biggest fan of Adams but I can see what he is trying to do and the constraints previous regimes and he have put on this team with their decisions. Just because we don't want them to exist doesn't mean they don't exist and there isn't, most likely, a person who comes in and the Aura around the team goes away.

They sat around and done nothing yet got close 2 years ago. His goaltending plan is hopium - there is no plan there. He has a couple of offensemen who can't defend their way out of their own zone and wants to pay a bunch of his own draft pick wingers who play the wrong way. I don't see a plan, I see someone sitting around and waiting... and waiting... and then doing the least amount possible to just do something.
 
I was hinting more towards Adams was doing a rebuild and that the first 1-3 years this team shouldn't have expected playoffs.

My timeline once Sam and Jack went was:

20/21 - bottom barrel
21/22 - bottom barrel
22/23 - bottom 8
23/24 - bottom 12
24/25 - either Wild Card 2 or just out of the playoffs.

Rebuilds are an ugly phase that rarely work. I am not the biggest fan of Adams but I can see what he is trying to do and the constraints previous regimes and he have put on this team with their decisions. Just because we don't want them to exist doesn't mean they don't exist and there isn't, most likely, a person who comes in and the Aura around the team goes away.
20/21 when he comes on board he mainly listens to what the coach wants.

The summer after is when the rebuild starts

21/22 (12/13)
22/23 (13/14)
23/24 (14/15)

The and make playoffs

24/25 (15/16)
 
You are literally arguing over a comment made in jest yet refuse to hold Adams responsible.

So you want to argue with me over a comment but give Adams a free pass on his comments.

Bizarre to say the least you will argue with me and try to hold me accountable but not Adams.
I'm not arguing your point, more showing the flaw in the logic your were trying to directly compare it to.

I also noted that I don't ever recall Adams saying he had a 4 year plan. I did a quick Google search and couldn't find it either. I'm sure you have it bookmarked somewhere, so feel free to cite it.

I am also not saying Adams is a good or great GM. I am saying when he took on this mess, it was in shambles. I am sure he thought he could fix it in 4 years but there are maybe 3 or 4 GM's out there that could have fixed it and been in the playoffs in 4 or less years. If they fired him tomorrow, I would be fine with it but the reality is Regier burning it down, Murray trying to fast track a rebuild and Botterill having no f***ing clue how to be a GM all put this team into a deep void for Adams to try and be a Phoenix when he is more of a Penguin
 
They sat around and done nothing yet got close 2 years ago. His goaltending plan is hopium - there is no plan there. He has a couple of offensemen who can't defend their way out of their own zone and wants to pay a bunch of his own draft pick wingers who play the wrong way. I don't see a plan, I see someone sitting around and waiting... and waiting... and then doing the least amount possible to just do something.
He hasn't done nothing since getting close a few years ago. I genuinely believe he has been trying to go the trade route to improve the team, players just instantly have Buffalo on their no trade list or they might be FA's in a year and wouldn't talk extension. I think of last off-season when there were apparently packages accepted for Ehlers and Necas. Ehlers said he wasn't signing an extension with anyone and Necas flat out said, no.

The goaltending plan really blew up when Ullmark bailed. We are still feeling that today. There was no plan if Ullmark left which really makes me think Ullmark led them on, who knows but I remember something along the lines of 5 years 25 million being his give me and I'll sign and then he was down to us and Boston and took less money to leave.

Then it pivoted to youth because goaltending is incredibly hard to come by with a contract that isn't an anchor. UPL showed ok, then stumbled and Levi came in fresh and looked good and then UPL took over while Devon floundered. Comrie was bad. He then properly put Devon down for good, a bit late, this year.

Tldr - I believe he is trying, solid rumors out there indicate it but him banking on Ullmark really set his plan back awhile.
 
I'm not arguing your point, more showing the flaw in the logic your were trying to directly compare it to.

I also noted that I don't ever recall Adams saying he had a 4 year plan. I did a quick Google search and couldn't find it either. I'm sure you have it bookmarked somewhere, so feel free to cite it.

I am also not saying Adams is a good or great GM. I am saying when he took on this mess, it was in shambles. I am sure he thought he could fix it in 4 years but there are maybe 3 or 4 GM's out there that could have fixed it and been in the playoffs in 4 or less years. If they fired him tomorrow, I would be fine with it but the reality is Regier burning it down, Murray trying to fast track a rebuild and Botterill having no f***ing clue how to be a GM all put this team into a deep void for Adams to try and be a Phoenix when he is more of a Penguin
Flaw in my logic? That adams said it would take 4 years to make the playoffs and we are now gonna go to year 6 and you give him a free pass.

But Adams isn't flawed? lol.

There was no flaws in Adams plans but there was a flaw in my logic? lol.

He thought he could fix it in 4 years but now 5 years! Wait maybe 6 years! Why not 7?

He took it when it was in shambles? And its still in shambles. We were third last in the league two weeks ago thats called shambles.

Kevyn Adams is about to own the record for most seasons for a GM and missing the playoffs but its not his fault cause the team was in shambles but now its not.

Adams is trash and he is a complete failure.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: oldgoalie
First, he's not going anywhere because Adams is Pegula. Second, Ruff has a two year contract so he will still be here next year, so what would be the point? No good GM would come into this situation while Ruff is still here anyways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nikolajs Sillers
It's definitely going to be another run-it-back season next year. HC and GM still have at least a year on each contract...youth getting into prime...faith in the locker room...yada yada after bs after talking points. Same shit, different year. The only real difference is that the team will have a whole year under Ruff's system and probably won't be farking terrible. So, probably finish ahead of Boston and maybe Detroit. Playoffs though??? Not even the most naive posters on this board are THAT stupid anymore. Team's a joke and the laughs are going to keep coming.
 
I don't like living in the past, but who, with hindsight, would have still wanted to trade for Patrick Laine?

47 GP 20G 13A 33P 14:29TOI/G 5GWG
He wouldn't have gotten hurt when he did.
Possible duplicate of Tage. But should have helped the power play.

15 PPG 19 PPP

If the answer is yes... just another example of cheapness/stupidity by Pegula/Adams.
 
Screenshot 2025-04-07 074916.jpg
 
I don't like living in the past, but who, with hindsight, would have still wanted to trade for Patrick Laine?

47 GP 20G 13A 33P 14:29TOI/G 5GWG
He wouldn't have gotten hurt when he did.
Possible duplicate of Tage. But should have helped the power play.

15 PPG 19 PPP

If the answer is yes... just another example of cheapness/stupidity by Pegula/Adams.
What does this mean?
 
Last edited:
Yeah i was trying to figure out how long his extension was but I don’t think there’s a definitive answer. I would think its 3 years and its been 2 since he signed it. So i tgink he comes back but Pegula lets the contract run out
 
Should he be? Absolutely. In a league where 1/2 the teams make the playoffs, a 5 year drought, especially when you start with two productive 1st line forwards and a blossoming franchise d-man to build off of, is unacceptable by any standard.

Will he be? Time will tell. I do think his seat is warmer than people think. The "early renewal" offer given to fans may have been a quick way to take the temperature of the fan base. He should have been gone in December after the press conference when he rattled off every excuse as to why none of this was his fault. I think it'll likely be a financial decision rather than a competence decision, sadly. The cheapest way to get the fanbase re-engaged might be to replace Adams, similar to last year where they made the nostalgia play at coach with Ruff rather than do a real coaching search.
 
I can live with that, what are the numbers in parenthesis?
Parallel to the first rebuild

12/13 vetscstarted to be moved out first picks
13/14 finishing most of it and changed GMs
14/15 tank for mcdavid
15/16 moves Nader to improve club.

The big difference was from prior yrs drafts. In the first rebuild they moved out what they had in U25 youth. Thus time they had more youth_ layers than before

Pominville, VanEK, and Miller were the big trades. This team had more vets yo sell off for high picks

EIchel, Reinhart, risto were comparative moves
 
Last edited:
I don’t think he can be fired. I think our best hope is that he gets “promoted” similar to Matt Ellis as a face saving gesture. He could get promoted to president of something or another, and removed from hockey decisions if Pegula doesn’t like the results he’s seeing. I doubt he’s canned outright.
 
He hasn't done nothing since getting close a few years ago. I genuinely believe he has been trying to go the trade route to improve the team, players just instantly have Buffalo on their no trade list or they might be FA's in a year and wouldn't talk extension. I think of last off-season when there were apparently packages accepted for Ehlers and Necas. Ehlers said he wasn't signing an extension with anyone and Necas flat out said, no.

I feel he made an effort on trades but
1. He lost the trade
2. He was not giving up the significant overpayment asked.
3. The player refused to talk contract/ sign



The goaltending plan really blew up when Ullmark bailed. We are still feeling that today. There was no plan if Ullmark left which really makes me think Ullmark led them on, who knows but I remember something along the lines of 5 years 25 million being his give me and I'll sign and then he was down to us and Boston and took less money to leave.

I agree. I think the plan was keeping Ullmark
Then it pivoted to youth because goaltending is incredibly hard to come by with a contract that isn't an anchor. UPL showed ok, then stumbled and Levi came in fresh and looked good and then UPL took over while Devon floundered. Comrie was bad. He then properly put Devon down for good, a bit late, this year.

I think he still had a long term plan at goalie in mind. Ullmark would be short term

Ullmark walked in 21
Buffalo had UPL who was coming off injury, Portillo-- at Michigan who played very little as back up in his freshman yr, , and then at draft acquired Levi.

Flaw in my logic? That adams said it would take 4 years to make the playoffs and we are now gonna go to year 6 and you give him a free pass.

But Adams isn't flawed? lol.

There was no flaws in Adams plans but there was a flaw in my logic? lol.

He thought he could fix it in 4 years but now 5 years! Wait maybe 6 years! Why not 7?

21/22, 22/23, 23/24 were rebuilding yrs.
24/25 start to compete.
He took it when it was in shambles? And its still in shambles. We were third last in the league two weeks ago thats called shambles.

Kevyn Adams is about to own the record for most seasons for a GM and missing the playoffs but its not his fault cause the team was in shambles but now its not.

Adams is trash and he is a complete failure.
Look back at teans out of the playoffs .
 
I thought it was time for this thread to begin , if there already is a thread on this I apologize .

But there is less than 10 games left in the season , Kevyn Adam’s has had 5 drafts , 3 coaches , 5 full offseason’s, he has overseen a full rebuild , traded a few stars ie ( Jack Eichel and Sam Reinhart ) who have both gone on to win the Stanley Cup.

And finally the team has taken a gigantic step back this season and we are in the draft lottery after Lindy Ruff was brought back to revitalize the franchise and that plan had failed miserably

Enough is Enough and I will get the ball rolling . I think Terry Pegula fires Adam’s the moment the season ends , I see no way and no how Adam’s gets a 6th season to run the franchise.
0% chance.
 
I'm not arguing your point, more showing the flaw in the logic your were trying to directly compare it to.

I also noted that I don't ever recall Adams saying he had a 4 year plan. I did a quick Google search and couldn't find it either. I'm sure you have it bookmarked somewhere, so feel free to cite it.

I am also not saying Adams is a good or great GM. I am saying when he took on this mess, it was in shambles. I am sure he thought he could fix it in 4 years but there are maybe 3 or 4 GM's out there that could have fixed it and been in the playoffs in 4 or less years. If they fired him tomorrow, I would be fine with it but the reality is Regier burning it down, Murray trying to fast track a rebuild and Botterill having no f***ing clue how to be a GM all put this team into a deep void for Adams to try and be a Phoenix when he is more of a Penguin
This team was not in shambles when Adams took over, but he quickly made sure that it was through his own actions.

He hasn't done nothing since getting close a few years ago. I genuinely believe he has been trying to go the trade route to improve the team, players just instantly have Buffalo on their no trade list or they might be FA's in a year and wouldn't talk extension. I think of last off-season when there were apparently packages accepted for Ehlers and Necas. Ehlers said he wasn't signing an extension with anyone and Necas flat out said, no.

The goaltending plan really blew up when Ullmark bailed. We are still feeling that today. There was no plan if Ullmark left which really makes me think Ullmark led them on, who knows but I remember something along the lines of 5 years 25 million being his give me and I'll sign and then he was down to us and Boston and took less money to leave.

Then it pivoted to youth because goaltending is incredibly hard to come by with a contract that isn't an anchor. UPL showed ok, then stumbled and Levi came in fresh and looked good and then UPL took over while Devon floundered. Comrie was bad. He then properly put Devon down for good, a bit late, this year.

Tldr - I believe he is trying, solid rumors out there indicate it but him banking on Ullmark really set his plan back awhile.
Whose fault is it Ullmark bailed? It's Adams who low balled Ullmark in the summer of 2020, leading to Ullmark filing for arbitration, and then settling on a cheap 1 year deal which walked him to UFA.

Can you imagine how insulting the initial offer Adams made to Ullmark must have been for this to be the contract they settled on to avoid arbitration?
1744037868463.png



In Adams defense, it does reek of an internal budget that he low-balled both Ullmark and Reinhart right after Terry's "effective, efficient, economic" comments. But if you believe Adams, he has never had an internal budget.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doug Prishpreed
I feel he made an effort on trades but
1. He lost the trade
2. He was not giving up the significant overpayment asked.
3. The player refused to talk contract/ sign





I agree. I think the plan was keeping Ullmark


I think he still had a long term plan at goalie in mind. Ullmark would be short term

Ullmark walked in 21
Buffalo had UPL who was coming off injury, Portillo-- at Michigan who played very little as back up in his freshman yr, , and then at draft acquired Levi.



21/22, 22/23, 23/24 were rebuilding yrs.
24/25 start to compete.

Look back at teans out of the playoffs .
That was his 4 year plan.

Compete = missing the playoffs by February the last two seasons.
 

Ad

Ad