Gurglesons
Registered User
I don't see a discernible difference in that scenario. What has Gruden done exactly to earn that? I think they are both meh.
One is 24 and will return value if he produces.
I don't see a discernible difference in that scenario. What has Gruden done exactly to earn that? I think they are both meh.
A good coach would know how to dangle carrots in front of a 24 year old on a two-way deal to get him to play better.One is 24 and will return value if he produces.
How hard is this to understand?It is a pretty small issue that really doesn't matter, and Acciari has been pretty good this year actually.
I just think that a good team should develop 4th liners from within rather than overpay for them in UFA. Your 4th line + extra forward should be less than $5 million total. Spend that money at positions more difficult to develop like top 6 or top 2 D pairings. If Gruden isn't cutting it you go to Poulin, then Pono, Katchouk, etc. until you find someone willing to do the work to stay in the NHL.
Once these lunch pail guys start having a family and making millions they kind of lose their effectiveness a bit.
How hard is it to understand not everyone agrees with that sentiment?How hard is this to understand?
How hard is this to understand?
100% agree with this. Acciari has been good for the role he's asked to do. PPL here just wanna hate on him because he's not a curtain jerker in the AHL. If we had to be mindful of every penny to fill out a roster that is playoff bound and needed to add a piece where by that extra small bit of cap space might matter, sure, THAT would make sense.It is a pretty small issue that really doesn't matter, and Acciari has been pretty good this year actually.